(a) EFFECTIVE DATE
This AD is effective January 21, 2014.
(b) AFFECTED ADS
This AD revises AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July 21,
1998), which superseded AD 95-26-18, Amendment 39-9476 (61 FR 623,
January 9, 1996.)
(c) APPLICABILITY
This AD applies to the following Maule Aerospace Technology, Inc.
airplanes, all serial numbers, identified in figure 1 of paragraph (c)
of this AD, that are:
(1) Equipped with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) Maule Aerospace
Technology, Inc. rear wing lift struts, part number (P/N) 2079E (or
FAA-approved equivalent part numbers), and/or front wing lift struts,
P/N 2080E (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers), excluding
airplanes equipped with four Maule sealed lift struts, P/N 2200E and
P/N 2201E, which are identified by two raised weld spots on the upper
end of the strut just below the serial number plate. Removal of the
upper cuff is needed to locate the weld spots; and
(2) certificated in any category.
FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD - APPLICABILITY
__________________________________________________________________________
MODELS
__________________________________________________________________________
Bee Dee M-4 M-4 M-4C M-4S M-4T
M-4-180C M-4-180S M-4-180T M-4-210 M-4-210C
M-4-210S M-4-210T M-4-220 M-4-220C M-4-220S
M-4-220T M-5-180C M-5-200 M-5-210C M-5-210TC
M-5-220C M-5-235C M-6-180 M-6-235 M-7-235
M-7-235A M-7-235B M-7-235C MT-7-235 MX-7-160
MX-7-180 MX-7-180A MX-7-180B MX-7-235 MX-7-420
MXT-7-160 MXT-7-180 MXT-7-180A M-8-235
_________________________________________________________________________
(d) SUBJECT
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA)
of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) UNSAFE CONDITION
(1) The subject of this AD was originally prompted by reports of corrosion
damage found on the wing lift struts. We are revising AD 98-15-18,
Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July 21, 1998), because of reports
that the language in paragraph (b) had been misinterpreted and caused
confusion. Since we issued AD 98-15-18, we were informed by the
manufacturer that Model MXT-7-420 airplanes are no longer in
existence, are no longer type certificated, and should be removed from
the Applicability section. This AD removes Model MXT-7-420 airplanes
from the Applicability section and clarifies the intent of the
language in paragraph (b) of AD 98-15-18, which is being removed by
this AD.
(2) This AD clarifies the FAA's intention that if a sealed wing lift strut
assembly is installed as a replacement part, the repetitive inspection
requirement is terminated only if the seal is never improperly broken.
If the seal is improperly broken, then that wing lift strut becomes
subject to continued repetitive inspections. We did not intend to
promote drilling holes into or otherwise unsealing a sealed strut.
This AD retains all the actions required in AD 98-15-18 and does not
add any actions over that already required in AD 98-15-18. This AD
does not add any additional burden to the owners/operators of the
affected airplanes.
(3) We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion on the front
and rear wing lift struts, which could cause the wing lift strut to
fail. This failure could result in the wing separating from the
airplane.
(f) PARAGRAPH DESIGNATION CHANGES TO AD 98-15-18
Since AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July 21, 1998),
was issued, the AD format has been revised, and certain paragraphs
have been rearranged. As a result, the corresponding paragraph
identifiers have changed in this AD, as listed in the following table:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (F) OF THIS AD - REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
______________________________________________________________________
CORRESPONDING REQUIREMENT
REQUIREMENT IN AD 98-15-18 IN THIS AD
______________________________________________________________________
paragraph (a) paragraph (h)
paragraph (a)(1) paragraph (i)(1)
paragraph (a)(1)(i) paragraph (i)(1)(i)
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) paragraph (i)(1)(ii)
paragraph (a)(2) paragraph (i)(2)
paragraph (a)(2)(i) paragraph (i)(2)(i)
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) paragraph (i)(2)(ii)
paragraph (a)(3) paragraph (j)(1)
paragraph (a)(4) and (c) paragraph (j)(2)
paragraph (b) Removed
______________________________________________________________________
(g) COMPLIANCE
Unless already done (compliance with AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669
(63 FR 39018, July 21, 1998)), do the following actions within the
compliance times specified in paragraphs (h) through (j) of this AD,
including all subparagraphs. Properly unsealing and resealing a sealed
wing lift strut is still considered a terminating action for the
repetitive inspection requirements of this AD as long as all
appropriate regulations and issues are considered, such as static
strength, fatigue, material effects, immediate and long-term (internal
and external) corrosion protection, resealing methods, etc. Current
FAA regulations in 14 CFR 43.13(b) specify that maintenance performed
will result in the part's condition to be at least equal to its
original or properly altered condition. Any maintenance actions that
unseal a sealed wing lift strut should be coordinated with the Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) through the local airworthiness
authority (e.g., Flight Standards District Office). There are
provisions in paragraph (k) of this AD for approving such actions as
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC).
(h) REMOVE WING LIFT STRUTS
At whichever of the compliance times specified in paragraphs (h)(1),
(h)(2), or (h)(3) of this AD that occurs later, remove the wing lift
struts following the INSTRUCTIONS section in PART I of Maule Service
Bulletin (SB) No. 11, dated October 30, 1995. Before further flight
after the removal, do the actions in one of the following paragraphs
(i)(1), (i)(2), (j)(1), or (j)(2) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs.
(1) Upon accumulating 2 years time-in-service on an OEM Maule wing lift
strut, P/N 2079E and/or P/N 2080E;
(2) Within 3 calendar months after September 9, 1998 (the effective date
retained from AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July 21,
1998)); or
(3) Within 2 years after the last inspection done in accordance with AD
95-26-18, Amendment 39-9476 (61 FR 623, January 9, 1996) (which was
superseded by AD 98-15-18).
(i) INSPECT WING LIFT STRUTS
Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (h) of
this AD, inspect each wing lift strut following paragraph (i)(1) or
(i)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, or do the wing lift
strut replacement following one of the options in paragraph (j)(1) or
(j)(2) of this AD.
(1) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion and perceptible dents
following the INSTRUCTIONS section in PART I of Maule SB No. 11, dated
October 30, 1995.
(i) If no corrosion is visible and no perceptible dents are found on any
wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (i)(1) of
this AD, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each wing
lift strut following the INSTRUCTIONS section in PART I of Maule SB
No. 11, dated October 30, 1995. Repetitively thereafter inspect each
wing lift strut at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months
following the procedures in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD,
including all subparagraphs.
(ii) If corrosion or perceptible dents are found on any wing lift strut
during the inspection required in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD or
during any repetitive inspection required in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of
this AD, before further flight, replace the affected wing lift strut
with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph (j)(1) or
(j)(2) of this AD. Do the replacement following the procedures
specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.
(2) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion following the procedures in
the Appendix to this AD. This inspection must be done by a Level 2 or
Level 3 inspector certified using the guidelines established by the
American Society for Non-destructive Testing or the "Military Standard
for Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and Certification"
(MIL-STD-410E), which can be found on the Internet at http://aerospace
defense.thomasnet.com/Asset/ MIL-STD-410.pdf.
(i) If no corrosion is found on any wing lift strut during the inspection
required in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD and all requirements in the
Appendix to this AD are met, before further flight, apply corrosion
inhibitor to each wing lift strut following the INSTRUCTIONS section
in PART I of Maule SB No. 11, dated October 30, 1995. Repetitively
thereafter inspect each wing lift strut at intervals not to exceed 24
calendar months following the procedures in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2)
of this AD, including all subparagraphs.
(ii) If corrosion is found on any wing lift strut during the inspection
required in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD or during any repetitive
inspection required in paragraph (i)(2)(i) of this AD, or if any
requirement in the Appendix of this AD is not met, before further
flight after any inspection in which corrosion is found or the
Appendix requirements are not met, replace the affected wing lift
strut with one of the replacement options specified in paragraph
(j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD. Do the replacement following the
procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.
(j) WING LIFT STRUT REPLACEMENT OPTIONS
Before further flight after the removal required in paragraph (h) of
this AD, replace the wing lift struts following one of the options in
paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD, or inspect each wing lift strut
following paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs.
(1) Install OEM Maule P/N wing lift struts (or FAA-approved equivalent
part numbers) that have been inspected following the procedures in
either paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs, and are found to be airworthy. Do the installations
following the INSTRUCTIONS section in PART II of Maule SB No. 11,
dated October 30, 1995. Repetitively thereafter inspect the newly
installed wing lift struts at intervals not to exceed 24 calendar
months following the procedures in either paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2)
of this AD, including all subparagraphs.
(2) Install new Maule sealed wing lift struts, P/N 2200E or P/N 2201E, as
applicable (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers) following the
INSTRUCTIONS section in PART II of Maule SB No. 11, dated October 30,
1995. Installing one of these new sealed wing lift strut assemblies
terminates the repetitive inspection requirements in paragraphs (i)(1)
or (i)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, for that wing lift
strut assembly.
(k) ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE (AMOCS)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to
the attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal in-
spector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(3) AMOCs approved for AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July
21, 1998) and AD 95-26-18, Amendment 39-9476 (61 FR 623, January 9,
1996) are approved as AMOCs for this AD.
(l) RELATED INFORMATION
For more information about this AD, contact Gregory K. Noles,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College
Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email
gregory.noles@faa.gov.
(m) MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on January 26,
1996 (61 FR 623, January 9, 1996).
(i) Maule Service Bulletin No. 11, dated October 30, 1995.
(ii) Reserved.
(4) For Maule Aerospace Technology, Inc. service information identified in
this AD, contact Maule Air, Inc., 2099 GA Hwy 133 South, Moultrie,
Georgia 31768; telephone: (229) 985-2045; fax: (229) 890-2402;
Internet: http://www.mauleairinc.com/pdf/servicebulletins/service_bull
etin_11_old.pdf.
(5) You may view this service information at Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
(6) You may view this service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call
202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
APPENDIX TO AD 98-15-18 R1
PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF MAULE WING LIFT
STRUTS
EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS
1. A portable ultrasonic thickness gauge or flaw detector with echo-to-
echo digital thickness readout capable of reading to 0.001-inch and an
A-trace waveform display will be needed to do this inspection.
2. An ultrasonic probe with the following specifications will be needed to
do this inspection: 10 MHz (or higher), 0.283-inch (or smaller)
diameter dual element or delay line transducer designed for thickness
gauging. The transducer and ultrasonic system shall be capable of
accurately measuring the thickness of AISI 4340 steel down to 0.020
-inch. An accuracy of 0.002-inch throughout a 0.020-inch to 0.050-inch
thickness range while calibrating shall be the criteria for acceptance.
3. Either a precision machined step wedge made of 4340 steel (or similar
steel with equivalent sound velocity) or at least three shim samples of
same material will be needed to do this inspection. One thickness of
the step wedge or shim shall be less than or equal to 0.020-inch, one
shall be greater than or equal to 0.050-inch and at least one other
step or shim shall be between these two values.
4. Glycerin, light oil, or similar non-water based ultrasonic couplants
are recommended in the setup and inspection procedures. Water-based
couplants, containing appropriate corrosion inhibitors, may be
utilized, provided they are removed from both the reference standards
and the test item after the inspection procedure is completed and
adequate corrosion prevention steps are then taken to protect these
items.
NOTE: Couplant is defined as "a substance used between the face of the
transducer and test surface to improve transmission of ultrasonic energy
across the transducer/strut interface."
NOTE: If surface roughness due to paint loss or corrosion is present, the
surface should be sanded or polished smooth before testing to assure a
consistent and smooth surface for making contact with the transducer. Care
shall be taken to remove a minimal amount of structural material. Paint
repairs may be necessary after the inspection to prevent further corrosion
damage from occurring. Removal of surface irregularities will enhance the
accuracy of the inspection technique.
INSTRUMENT SETUP
1. Set up the ultrasonic equipment for thickness measurements as specified
in the instrument's user's manual. Because of the variety of equipment
available to perform ultrasonic thickness measurements, some
modification to this general setup procedure may be necessary. However,
the tolerance requirement of step 13 and the record keeping requirement
of step 14, must be satisfied.
2. If battery power will be employed, check to see that the battery has
been properly charged. The testing will take approximately two hours.
Screen brightness and contrast should be set to match environmental
conditions.
3. Verify that the instrument is set for the type of transducer being
used, i.e. single or dual element, and that the frequency setting is
compatible with the transducer.
4. If a removable delay line is used, remove it and place a drop of coup-
lant between the transducer face and the delay line to assure good
transmission of ultrasonic energy. Reassemble the delay line transducer
and continue.
5. Program a velocity of 0.231-inch/microsecond into the ultrasonic unit
unless an alternative instrument calibration procedure is used to set
the sound velocity.
6. Obtain a step wedge or steel shims per item 3 of the Equipment Require-
ments. Place the probe on the thickest sample using couplant. Rotate
the transducer slightly back and forth to "ring" the transducer to the
sample. Adjust the delay and range settings to arrive at an A-trace
signal display with the first backwall echo from the steel near the
left side of the screen and the second backwall echo near the right of
the screen. Note that when a single element transducer is used, the
initial pulse and the delay line/steel interface will be off of the
screen to the left. Adjust the gain to place the amplitude of the first
backwall signal at approximately 80% screen height on the A-trace.
7. "Ring" the transducer on the thinnest step or shim using couplant.
Select positive half-wave rectified, negative half-wave rectified, or
filtered signal display to obtain the cleanest signal. Adjust the pulse
voltage, pulse width, and damping to obtain the best signal resolution.
These settings can vary from one transducer to another and are also
user dependent.
8. Enable the thickness gate, and adjust the gate so that it starts at the
first backwall echo and ends at the second backwall echo. (Measuring
between the first and second backwall echoes will produce a measurement
of the steel thickness that is not affected by the paint layer on the
strut). If instability of the gate trigger occurs, adjust the gain,
gate level, and/or damping to stabilize the thickness reading.
9. Check the digital display reading and if it does not agree with the
known thickness of the thinnest thickness, follow your instrument's
calibration recommendations to produce the correct thickness reading.
When a single element transducer is used this will usually involve
adjusting the fine delay setting.
10. Place the transducer on the thickest step of shim using couplant. Ad-
just the thickness gate width so that the gate is triggered by the
second backwall reflection of the thick section. If the digital
display does not agree with the thickest thickness, follow your
instruments calibration recommendations to produce the correct
thickness reading. A slight adjustment in the velocity may be
necessary to get both the thinnest and the thickest reading correct.
Document the changed velocity value.
11. Place couplant on an area of the lift strut which is thought to be
free of corrosion and "ring" the transducer to surface. Minor
adjustments to the signal and gate settings may be required to account
for coupling improvements resulting from the paint layer. The
thickness gate level should be set just high enough so as not to be
triggered by irrelevant signal noise. An area on the upper surface of
the lift strut above the inspection area would be a good location to
complete this step and should produce a thickness reading between
0.034-inch and 0.041-inch.
12. Repeat steps 8, 9, 10, and 11 until both thick and thin shim measure-
ments are within tolerance and the lift strut measurement is
reasonable and steady.
13. Verify that the thickness value shown in the digital display is within
0.002-inch of the correct value for each of the three or more steps of
the setup wedge or shims. Make no further adjustments to the
instrument settings.
14. Record the ultrasonic versus actual thickness of all wedge steps or
steel shims available as a record of setup.
INSPECTION PROCEDURE
1. Clean the lower 18 inches of the wing lift struts using a cleaner that
will remove all dirt and grease. Dirt and grease will adversely affect
the accuracy of the inspection technique. Light sanding or polishing
may also be required to reduce surface roughness as noted in the
Equipment Requirements section.
2. Using a flexible ruler, draw a 1/4-inch grid on the surface of the
first 11 inches from the lower end of the strut as shown in Maule Air,
Inc. Service Bulletin No. 11, dated October 30, 1995, as applicable.
This can be done using a soft (2) pencil and should be done on both
faces of the strut. As an alternative to drawing a complete grid, make
two rows of marks spaced every 1/4 inch across the width of the strut.
One row of marks should be about 11 inches from the lower end of the
strut, and the second row should be several inches away where the strut
starts to narrow. Lay the flexible ruler between respective tick marks
of the two rows and use tape or a rubber band to keep the ruler in
place. See Figure 1.
3. Apply a generous amount of couplant inside each of the square areas or
along the edge of the ruler. Re-application of couplant may be
necessary.
4. Place the transducer inside the first square area of the drawn grid or
at the first 1/4-inch mark on the ruler and "ring" the transducer to
the strut. When using a dual element transducer, be very careful to
record the thickness value with the axis of the transducer elements
perpendicular to any curvature in the strut. If this is not done, loss
of signal or inaccurate readings can result.
5. Take readings inside each square on the grid or at 1/4-inch increments
along the ruler and record the results. When taking a thickness
reading, rotate the transducer slightly back and forth and experiment
with the angle of contact to produce the lowest thickness reading
possible. Pay close attention to the A-scan display to assure that the
thickness gate is triggering off of maximized backwall echoes.
NOTE: A reading shall not exceed .041 inch. If a reading exceeds .041
inch, repeat steps 13 and 14 of the Instrument Setup section before
proceeding further.
6. If the A-trace is unsteady or the thickness reading is clearly wrong,
adjust the signal gain and/or gate setting to obtain reasonable and
steady readings. If any instrument setting is adjusted, repeat steps 13
and 14 of the Instrument Setup section before proceeding further.
7. In areas where obstructions are present, take a data point as close to
the correct area as possible.
NOTE: The strut wall contains a fabrication bead at approximately 40% of
the strut chord. The bead may interfere with accurate measurements in that
specific location.
8. A measurement of 0.024 inch or less shall require replacement of the
strut prior to further flight.
9. If at any time during testing an area is encountered where a valid
thickness measurement cannot be obtained due to a loss of signal
strength or quality, the area shall be considered suspect. These areas
may have a remaining wall thickness of less than 0.020-inch, which is
below the range of this setup, or they may have small areas of
localized corrosion or pitting present. The latter case will result in
a reduction in signal strength due to the sound being scattered from
the rough surface and may result in a signal that includes echoes from
the pits as well as the backwall. The suspect area(s) shall be tested
with a Maule "Fabric Tester" as specified in Maule Air, Inc. Service
Bulletin No. 11, dated October 30, 1995.
10. Record the lift strut inspection in the aircraft log book.
ILLUSTRATION (Figure 1)
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 22, 2013. Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory "Keith" Noles, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404)
474-5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are revising Airworthiness Directive (AD) 98-15-18
that
applies to certain Maule Aerospace Technology, Inc. Models M-4, M-5, M-
6, M-7, MT-7, MX-7, MXT-7, and M-8 airplanes that are equipped with
rear wing lift struts, part number (P/N) 2079E, and/or front wing lift
struts, P/N 2080E. AD 98-15-18 required repetitively inspecting certain
wing lift struts for internal corrosion and replacing of any wing lift
strut where corrosion was found. Since we issued AD 98-15-18, we were
informed by the manufacturer that Model MXT-7-420 airplanes are no
longer in existence, are no longer type certificated, and should be
removed from the Applicability section. We were also informed that
paragraph (b) in AD 98-15-18 had been misinterpreted and caused
confusion. This AD removes Model MXT-7-420 airplanes from the
Applicability section and clarifies the intent of the language in
paragraph (b) of AD 98-15-18. This AD also retains all other
requirements of AD 98-15-18. We are issuing this AD to correct the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 21, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 26,
1996 (61 FR 623, January 9, 1996).
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Maule
Air, Inc., 2099 GA Hwy 133 South, Moultrie, Georgia 31768; telephone:
(229) 985-2045; fax: (229) 890-2402; Internet: http://www.mauleairinc.com/pdf/servicebulletins/service_bulletin_11_old.
pdf. You may review copies of the referenced service information at
the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.
gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-
2013-0725; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory ``Keith'' Noles, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, 1701 Columbia
Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404) 474-5551; fax: (404)
474-5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to revise AD 98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July
21, 1998), (``AD 98-15-18''). AD 98-15-18 was also reissued with a
correction on September 18, 1998 (63 FR 51520, September 28, 1998). AD
98-15-18 applied to the specified products. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on August 13, 2013 (78 FR 49207). The NPRM proposed to
retain all requirements of AD 98-15-18, remove Model MXT-7-420
airplanes from the Applicability section, and clarify our intent of
required actions if the seal on a sealed wing lift strut is ever
improperly broken.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (78 FR 49207, August 13,
2013) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 49207, August 13, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 49207, August 13, 2013).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 1,196 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD. However,
the only difference in the costs presented below and the costs
associated with AD 98-15-18 is the change in the labor rate from $65
per hour to $85 per hour.
Estimated Costs
Action
|
Labor cost
|
Parts cost
|
Cost per
product
|
Cost on
U.S.
operators
|
Inspection of the wing lift struts. |
11 x $85 per hour = $935 per
inspection
cycle. |
$40 |
$975 per inspection
cycle.
|
$1,166,100 per inspection
cycle. |
We estimate the following costs to
do any necessary replacements
that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of airplanes that might need these
replacements:
On-Condition Costs
Action
|
Labor cost
per wing lift strut
|
Parts cost
per wing lift strut
|
Cost per
product per
wing lift strut
|
Replacement of the wing lift
strut |
5 work-hours x $85 per hour =
$425 |
$500
|
$925
|
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
98-15-18, Amendment 39-10669 (63 FR 39018, July 21, 1998), and adding
the following new AD:
|