DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2022-0600; Project Identifier AD-2021-01160-R]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell Textron Inc., Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that would have applied to all Bell Textron Inc., Model 204B, 205A,
205A-1, 205B, and 210 helicopters. This AD was prompted by an accident
and incidents involving failure of the tail boom attachment structure.
This action revises the NPRM by changing the proposed required actions
and adding a special flight permit limitation. The FAA is proposing
this airworthiness directive (AD) to address the unsafe condition on
these products. Since these actions would impose an additional burden
over those in the NPRM, the agency is requesting comments on this
SNPRM.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this SNPRM by June 24, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0600; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, this SNPRM,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For Bell material, contact Bell Textron Inc., P.O. Box
482, Fort Worth, TX 76101; phone (450) 437-2862 or (800) 363-8023; fax
(450) 433-0272; email productsupport@bellflight.com; website:
bellflight.com/support/contact-support.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Office
of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
Other Related Service Information: For other service information
identified in this SNPRM, contact Bell Textron Inc., P.O. Box 482, Fort
Worth, TX 76101; phone (450) 437-2862 or (800) 363-8023; fax (450) 433-
0272; email productsupport@bellflight.com; website: bellflight.com/support/contact-support.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Perrin, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1801 S Airport Road, Wichita, KS 67209; phone: (562)
627-5362; email: Michael.j.perrin@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2022-0600;
Project Identifier AD-2021-01160-R" at the beginning of your comments.
The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may again revise this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this SNPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this SNPRM contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this SNPRM, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as "PROPIN." The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this SNPRM. Submissions containing CBI should
be sent to Michael Perrin, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1801 S
Airport Road, Wichita, KS 67209; phone: (562) 627-5362; email:
Michael.j.perrin@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2021-15-14, Amendment 39-21661 (86 FR 39942, July
26, 2021) (AD 2021-15-14) for various restricted category helicopters.
AD 2021-15-14 was prompted by an accident involving a Model UH-1B
helicopter and two forced landings involving Model UH-1H and UH-1F
helicopters, due to tail boom attachment structure failures. Each of
the three events involved a failure of the upper left-hand (LH) tail
boom attachment fitting, which is the most heavily loaded at the four
tail boom attach points. The FAA issued AD 2021-15-14 to address
fatigue cracking of tail boom attachment fittings, cap angles,
longerons, and bolts.
Due to their similarity to the Model UH-1B, UH-1H, and UH-1F
helicopters, the FAA determined that Bell Textron Inc., Model 204B,
205A, 205A-1, 205B, and 210 helicopters are also affected by the same
unsafe condition and issued an NPRM to propose the same actions as
those required in AD 2021-15-14. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on June 7, 2022 (87 FR 34587) to amend 14 CFR part 39, and
would have applied to Bell Textron Inc., Model 204B, 205A, 205A-1,
205B, and 210 helicopters. The NPRM proposed to require revising the
helicopter's existing rotorcraft flight manual (RFM) to incorporate
pre-flight checks; removing excess paint and sealant, and cleaning
certain parts; and repetitive inspections of structural components that
attach the tail boom to the fuselage. Depending on the inspection
results, the NPRM proposed to require repairing or replacing
components, or re-bonding the structure.
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the FAA has determined changes to
the proposed required actions are necessary, primarily based on
comments received from several commenters and additional review. The
FAA has also determined to require a special flight permit limitation
as proposed in this SNPRM.
Comments
The FAA received comments from four commenters. The following
discussion presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response.
Requests To Withdraw the NPRM
Request: Delta Helicopters Ltd. (DHL) and Remote Helicopters Ltd.
(RHL) stated that because Bell service information and established
maintenance programs already provide the needed requirements to address
the unsafe condition, the proposed AD is not necessary. Additionally,
an individual commenter stated the proposed requirements will not
prevent a sudden failure and stated that daily nut and bolt
inspections, replacement of bolts and nuts at scheduled intervals, and
maintaining proper torque would be just as effective as the
requirements proposed in the NPRM.
DHL stated that although damage does occur, sudden failures will
not occur unless the helicopter is being operated outside of its
capabilities and not being inspected properly as already prescribed by
Bell in related alert service bulletins (ASBs). RHL stated that the
proposed requirements in the NPRM are not necessary because properly
accomplishing the service information from Bell and operating the
helicopter within the appropriate parameters are sufficient. The FAA
infers that these commenters are requesting that the FAA withdraw the
NPRM.
FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. While an operator may incorporate
into its maintenance program the inspections in the manufacturer's
service bulletins referenced by the commenters, not all operators are
required to do so. In order for these inspections to become mandatory,
and to correct the unsafe conditions identified in the NPRM, the FAA
must issue an AD.
Request: DHL, RHL, and one individual commenter each stated that
the restricted category helicopters and the Bell Textron Inc., Model
204 and 205 helicopters have significant dissimilarities. DHL stated
that the comparison between restricted category and Bell Textron Inc.,
Model 204B and 205A-1 helicopters is not accurate, and the Model 205
structure has more in common with the structure of a Model 212
helicopter.
RHL stated that the tail boom inspection for the Model UH-1
helicopter is more difficult because of lack of access to the
inspection areas. Accordingly, RHL stated that lack of access to the
inspection areas is not a problem for Bell Textron Inc., Model 205
helicopters, and because of this, the inspection areas for these
helicopters are inspected on a regular basis.
Additionally, one individual commenter stated the structural design
of the tail boom and the fuselage attachment structure is different
when comparing Model UH helicopters to Bell Textron Inc., Model 205A,
205A-1, 205B, and 210 helicopters, and that these helicopters are more
robust than the Model UH helicopter. The individual commenter also
stated the failures mentioned in the NPRM occurred only on Model UH
helicopters used during heli-logging, and heavy lift activities, but
that commenter has never seen these failures during heavy lift
activities in the Bell Textron Inc., Model 205A-1 helicopter. Finally,
the individual commenter stated the proposed AD is unwarranted and
without basis to include the Bell Textron Inc., Model 205A, 205A-1,
205B, and 210 helicopters in the applicability as they are closer in
similarity to the Bell Textron Inc., Model 212 helicopter. The FAA
infers that these commenters are requesting that the FAA withdraw the NPRM.
FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. An examination of the structures
of both the Model UH-1 helicopters and the Bell Textron Inc., Model 204
and 205 helicopters indicated no significant differences between the
commercial and military model helicopters. Furthermore, there have been
reported tail boom attachment failures involving the Bell Textron Inc.,
Model 205 helicopter. Additionally, performing heavy lift operations
such as logging could accelerate failures in the tail boom attachment
region. The FAA expects that the number of tail boom attachment
failures will increase over time and will also include those aircraft
not involved in heavy lift operations.
Request for Changes to the Required Actions
Request: DHL commenter stated that stripping paint is not necessary
to detect damage during routine maintenance.
FAA Response: The FAA agrees and has revised this SNPRM accordingly.
Request: One individual commenter stated inspection requirements
are part of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness and should not
be included in a flight manual. The individual commenter stated a
mandatory inspection is a stand-alone inspection and is not related to
the operation of an aircraft, which is the main reason for a flight
manual. Furthermore, the commenter stated maintenance personnel
would not review or reference a flight manual for inspection requirements.
FAA Response: The FAA agrees and has revised this proposed AD
accordingly by removing the requirement of revising the rotorcraft
flight manual from the required actions.
Comment Regarding an Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) Request
Request: One individual commenter requested the ability to submit a
request for an AMOC for the tail boom sensor supplemental type
certificate.
FAA Response: The FAA agrees that operators may request approval of
an AMOC under the provisions of paragraph (j) of this SNPRM.
FAA's Determination
The FAA is proposing this AD after determining the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of
the same type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope
of the NPRM. As a result, it is necessary to reopen the comment period
to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on this
SNPRM.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Bell Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 210-21-15,
Revision A, dated February 23, 2022 (ASB 210-21-15, Rev A). This
service information specifies procedures for replacing the steel alloy
barrel nuts with nickel alloy barrel nuts, inspecting, and replacing
the tail boom attachment hardware, stabilizing the tail boom attachment
hardware torque, applying torque seals, and subsequently checking the
torque.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Bell ASB 205-21-118, Bell ASB 204B-21-75, and Bell
ASB 205B-21-72, each Revision A and dated February 23, 2022. This
service information specifies the same procedures as ASB 210-21-15, Rev A.
Proposed AD Requirements in This SNPRM
This proposed AD would require for Bell Textron Inc., Model 204B
helicopters, with the tailboom assembly removed, removing the upper
left-hand (LH) bolt from service and inspecting the bolt's associated
attachment hardware, and depending on the inspection results, removing
the associated nut from service. This proposed AD would also require
visually inspecting each bulkhead, bolt hole, attachment fitting, the
three other nuts, the upper right-hand bolt, and two lower bolts,
including the bolt shank and head radii. Depending on inspection
results, this proposed AD would require repairing or replacing an
affected bulkhead or affected fitting, removing certain part-numbered
nuts, removing any affected nut and its associated bolt from service,
and removing any affected bolt from service.
This proposed AD would require for Bell Textron Inc., Model 205A,
205A-1, and 205B helicopters, with the tail boom assembly removed,
removing the upper LH bolt from service, and inspecting its associated
barrel nut and retainer, and depending on the inspection results,
removing barrel nut and retainer from service. This proposed AD would
also require visually inspecting each bulkhead, bolt hole, attachment
fitting, the three other barrel nuts, associated retainers, the upper
right-hand bolt, and two lower bolts, including the bolt shank and head
radii. Depending on inspection results, this proposed AD would require
repairing or replacing an affected bulkhead or affected fitting,
removing certain part-numbered barrel nuts and retainers, removing any
affected barrel nuts and its associated bolt from service, and removing
any affected bolt from service.
This proposed AD would require for Bell Textron Inc., Model 210
helicopters, with the tail boom supported, removing the upper LH steel
alloy barrel nut, retainer, and bolt from service. This proposed AD
would also require removing the countersunk washer and plain washers,
and replacing them with a new certain part-numbered nickel alloy barrel
nut, new retainer, new bolt, an airworthy countersunk washer, and
airworthy plain washers. This proposed AD would also require visually
inspecting the upper RH bolt and its associated hardware, and depending
on the inspection results, removing the upper RH bolt and barrel nut
from service. Additionally, this proposed AD would require visually
inspecting the two lower bolts and the associated barrel nuts, and
depending on the inspection results, removing any affected barrel nut
and its associated bolt from service, and removing any affected bolt
from service.
Additionally, this proposed AD would require for all applicable
helicopters, after the initial inspections have been completed,
applying a coating of grease to each bolt shank only, installing the
applicable hardware, and torquing each bolt by using the torque value
information identified in this proposed AD or identified in ASB 210-21-
15, Rev A as applicable.
Thereafter, for all applicable helicopters, this proposed AD would
require inspecting the torque applied on each bolt to determine if the
torque has stabilized and, depending on the results, replacing and
inspecting certain tail boom attachment point hardware and repeating
the torque inspections, or applying torque stripes.
Lastly, this proposed AD would prohibit installing certain part-
numbered steel alloy nuts on any Model 204B helicopters; and would
prohibit installing certain part-numbered steel alloy barrel nuts on
any Model 205A, 205A-1, 205B, and 210 helicopters.
Differences Between This SNPRM and the Service Information
The service information specifies checking torque, whereas this
proposed AD would require inspecting torque because that action must be
accomplished by persons authorized under 14 CFR 43.3.
When stabilizing the tail boom attachment hardware torque, the
service information does not specify what to do if the torque on a tail
boom attachment bolt is below the minimum allowable torque limit,
whereas this proposed AD would require replacing and inspecting certain
tail boom attachment point hardware, stabilizing the torque of the
replaced hardware set, and applying torque stripes.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 62 (five Model
204B helicopters, fifty-three Model 205A, 205A-1, and 205B helicopters,
and four Model 210 helicopters) of U.S. registry. Labor costs are
estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on these numbers, the FAA
estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed AD.
For the initial requirements for Model 204B helicopters, inspecting
or replacing up to four bolts (which includes applying a coating of
grease), inspecting each bulkhead, inspecting each fitting and bolt
hole, inspecting and stabilizing the torque, and applying torque
stripes would take up to approximately 8.5 work-hours for an estimated
labor cost of up to $723. The parts cost for an upper LH bolt would be
approximately $196 and the parts cost for the other bolts would be
approximately $89 per bolt. The parts cost for four new nuts would be
approximately $680. The parts cost to apply torque stripes would be a
nominal amount. The estimated cost for these actions would be up to
approximately $1,866 per helicopter and $9,330 for the U.S. fleet.
For the initial requirements for Model 205A, 205A-1, and 205B
helicopters, replacing the four steel alloy barrel nuts with new nickel
alloy barrel nuts, inspecting or replacing up to four bolts (which
includes applying a coating of grease), inspecting each bulkhead,
inspecting and stabilizing the torque, and applying torque stripes
would take up to approximately 8.5 work-hours for an estimated labor
cost of up to $723. The parts cost for the four new nickel alloy barrel
nuts (including retainers) would be approximately $680. The parts cost
for an upper LH bolt would be approximately $196 and the parts cost for
the other bolts would be approximately $89 per bolt. The parts cost to
apply torque stripes would be a nominal amount. The estimated cost for
these actions would be up to approximately $1,866 per helicopter and
$98,898 for the U.S. fleet.
For the intital requirements for Model 210 helicopters, replacing
the four steel alloy barrel nuts with new nickel alloy barrel nuts,
inspecting or replacing up to four bolts (which includes applying a
coating of grease), inspecting and stabilizing the torque, and applying
torque stripes would take up to approximately 8.5 work-hours for an
estimated labor cost of up to $723. The parts cost for the four new
nickel alloy barrel nuts (including retainers) would be approximately
$680. The parts cost for an upper LH bolt would be approximately $196
and the parts cost for the other bolts would be approximately $89 per
bolt. The parts cost to apply torque stripes would be a nominal amount.
The estimated cost for these actions would be up to approximately
$1,866 per helicopter and $7,464 for the U.S. fleet.
For all applicable helicopters, inspecting the torque applied on
each bolt would take approximately 1 work-hour for an estimated cost of
$85 per helicopter and $5,270 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle.
For all applicable helicopters, replacing an upper LH bolt,
stabilizing the torque, and applying a torque stripe would take up to
approximately 5 work-hours. The parts cost for an upper LH bolt would
be approximately $196 and the parts cost to apply a torque stripe would
be a nominal amount. The estimated cost for these actions would be up
to approximately $621 per helicopter and $38,502 for the U.S. fleet,
per replacement cycle. Inspecting one of the other bolts, stabilizing
the torque, and applying a torque stripe would take up to approximately
3.5 work-hours for an estimated cost of $298 per other bolt and $18,476
for the U.S. fleet per other bolt per inspection cycle. If required,
replacing a bolt following that inspection would take a minimal amount
of additional time and the parts cost would be approximately $89.
If required as a result of failing any torque inspection required
by this proposed AD, visually inspecting a nut or a barrel nut,
replacing a bolt, stabilizing the torque, and applying a torque stripe
would take up to approximately 5.5 work-hours per failed hardware set.
The parts cost for an upper LH bolt would be approximately $196 and the
parts cost for the other bolts would be approximately $89 per bolt. The
parts cost to apply a torque stripe would be a nominal amount. The
estimated cost for these actions would be $664 (upper LH bolt) or $557
(other bolts), per failed hardware set. If required, replacing a nut
following that inspection would take a minimal amount of additional
time and the parts cost for a nut would be approximately $89 per nut,
and if required, replacing a barrel nut following that inspection would
take a minimal amount of additional time and the parts cost for a
barrel nut (including retainer) would be approximately $173 per barrel nut.
The corrective action that may be needed as a result of the
bulkhead inspection could vary significantly from helicopter to
helicopter. The FAA has no data to determine the costs to accomplish
the corrective action or the number of helicopters that may require
corrective action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
|