preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
2019-22-11 DE HAVILLAND AIRCRAFT OF CANADA LIMITED (TYPE CERTIFICATE PREVIOUSLY HELD BY BOMBARDIER, INC.):
Amendment 39-19790; Docket No. FAA-2019-0479; Product Identifier 2019-NM-020-AD.

(a) EFFECTIVE DATE

    This AD is effective January 9, 2020.

(b) AFFECTED ADS

    This AD replaces AD 2009-09-02, Amendment 39-15888 (74 FR 18121, April
    21, 2009) ("AD 2009-09-02").

(c) APPLICABILITY

    This  AD  applies  to  De Havilland  Aircraft of Canada Limited  (Type
    Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400, -401
    and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 4001,
    4003, and subsequent,  equipped  with  main landing gear (MLG) forward
    stabilizer brace part number (P/N) 46401-7.

(d) SUBJECT

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Main landing gear.

(e) REASON

    This AD was prompted  by reports of failures  of the aft hinge  of the
    MLG forward stabilizer brace due to fatigue cracks. The FAA is issuing
    this AD to address failure of the stabilizer brace, which could result
    in the collapse of the MLG.

(f) COMPLIANCE

    Comply  with this  AD within  the compliance  times specified,  unless
    already done.

(g) RETAINED INSPECTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WITH REVISED SERVICE INFOR-
    MATION AND REMOVED REPORTING REQUIREMENT

    This paragraph restates  the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD 2009-
    09-02, with new service information and removed reporting requirement.
    Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) At  the  applicable  time  specified  in  one  of paragraphs (g)(1)(i)
    through  (iv)  of  this AD:  Perform  non-destructive  inspections for
    damage of the MLG forward stabilizer brace assemblies P/N 46401-7,  in
    accordance with Bombardier Repair  Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1,  dated
    March  10,  2009,  and  Goodrich  Service  Concession  Request 026-09,
    Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or Bombardier Repair Drawing  8/4-32
    -099, Issue  4, dated  September 4,  2018, and  UTC Aerospace  Systems
    Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29,  2018.
    Repeat  the inspection  thereafter at  intervals not  to exceed  2,000
    flight cycles.  As of  the effective  date of  this AD, use Bombardier
    Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 4,  dated September 4, 2018, and  UTC
    Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated
    August 29, 2018, for the actions required by this paragraph.

(i) For airplanes with MLG forward stabilizer braces that have accumulated
    12,000  or  more  total flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the effective
    date of AD 2009-09-02):  Inspect within 50 flight cycles  after May 6,
    2009.

(ii) For  airplanes  with MLG forward stabilizer braces  that have accumu-
     lated 9,000  or more total flight cycles  but fewer than 12,000 total
     flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-09-02)
     Inspect before the accumulation  of  12,050  total flight cycles,  or
     within 500 flight cycles after May 6, 2009, whichever occurs earlier.

(iii) For airplanes  with MLG forward stabilizer braces  that have accumu-
      lated 4,500  or more total flight cycles  but fewer than 9,000 total
      flight cycles  as of May 6, 2009  (the effective date of AD 2009-09-
      02):  Inspect before  the accumulation of 9,500 total flight cycles,
      or  within 1,500 flight cycles after May 6, 2009,  whichever  occurs
      earlier.

(iv) For  airplanes  with MLG forward stabilizer braces  that have accumu-
     lated fewer than 4,500 total flight cycles  as  of  May 6, 2009  (the
     effective date of AD 2009-09-02):  Inspect before the accumulation of
     6,000 total flight cycles.

(2) If any damage is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g)
    (1) of this AD,  before  further flight,  do all applicable corrective
    actions in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
    Revision B,  dated  March 10, 2009;  or  UTC Aerospace Systems Service
    Concession Request 026-09,  Revision H,  dated August 29, 2018; except
    as  provided  by  paragraphs (g)(3) through (6) of this AD.  As of the
    effective date of this AD use UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
    Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions re-
    quired by this paragraph.

(3) For airplanes on which step 24. of Goodrich Service Concession Request
    026-09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009, has been done:  Within 1,200
    flight cycles after May 6, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-09-02),
    rework the MLG forward stabilizer brace,  and  except for airplanes on
    which the rework has been done,  within 600 flight cycles after May 6,
    2009,  do a detailed visual inspection  for  damage  of the stabilizer
    brace apex lugs in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request
    026-09,  Revision B,  dated March 10, 2009;  or  UTC Aerospace Systems
    Service Concession Request 026-09,  Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.
    If any damage is found,  repair  before  further flight  in accordance
    with Section C of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision
    B, dated March 10, 2009; or Section C of UTC Aerospace Systems Service
    Concession Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. As of the
    effective date of this AD use UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
    Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions re-
    quired by this paragraph.

(4) At  the  applicable  time  specified  in  one of paragraphs  (g)(4)(i)
    through (iii)  of  this  AD,  replace  the  forward  stabilizer  brace
    assembly,  in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-
    09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or UTC Aerospace Systems Service
    Concession Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. As of the
    effective date of this AD,  use  UTC Aerospace Systems Service Conces-
    sion Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions
    required by this paragraph.

(i) For airplanes  on which cracking is found during  any  inspection  re-
    quired by this AD,  and  the  cracking exceeds  the limit specified in
    paragraph (g)(4)(i)(A) or (B) of this AD, as applicable:  Replace  the
    assembly before further flight.

(A) For cracking  found  before the effective date of this AD:  The  limit
    specified in Section C  of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
    Revision B, dated March 10, 2009.

(B) For cracking  found on  or  after  the effective date of this AD:  The
    limit specified  in  Section C  or  Section D of UTC Aerospace Systems
    Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.

(ii) For airplanes on which any cracking is found  after the rework speci-
     fied  in  Section C  of  Goodrich  Service Concession Request 026-09,
     Revision B, dated March 10, 2009 or specified in Section C or Section
     D of UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09 Revision
     H, dated August 29, 2018: Replace the assembly before further flight.

(iii) For airplanes on which no cracking is found  after the rework speci-
      fied  in  Section C  of  Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
      Revision B,  dated  March 10, 2009;  or  specified  in  Section C or
      Section D of UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09
      Revision H, dated August 29, 2018: Replace the assembly within 2,700
      flight cycles after doing the rework.

(5) If foreign object damage is found during  any  inspection  required by
    this  AD,  or if damage is found  to a forward stabilizer brace lug or
    stop bracket retention hole apex bushing,  before further flight,  re-
    pair using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA;
    or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA);  or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA
    Design Approval Organization (DAO); or De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
    Limited's TCCA DAO.  If approved by the DAO, the approval must include
    the DAO-authorized signature.

(6) If any crack is found during the visual inspection  under 10X magnifi-
    cation,  repair  before  further  flight,  in accordance with Goodrich
    Service Concession Request 026-09,  Revision B,  dated March 10, 2009;
    or UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H
    dated August 29, 2018.  As of the effective date of this AD,  use  UTC
    Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated
    August 29, 2018, for the actions required by this paragraph.

(7) Before the accumulation of 6,000 total  flight cycles  on the MLG for-
    ward stabilizer braces, or within  600 flight hours after May  6, 2009
    (the effective date  of AD 2009-09-02),  whichever occurs later:  Do a
    detailed visual inspection for cracking of both MLG forward stabilizer
    braces  and  do  all  applicable  liquid  penetrant  inspections   for
    cracking, in accordance with Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 338,
    dated February 23, 2009. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
    not to exceed 600  flight hours. If any  cracking is found during  any
    inspection required by this paragraph, repair before further flight in
    accordance with Bombardier Repair  Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1,  dated
    March  10,  2009,  and  Goodrich  Service  Concession  Request 026-09,
    Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or Bombardier Repair Drawing  8/4-32
    -099, Issue  4, dated  September 4,  2018, and  UTC Aerospace  Systems
    Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29,  2018.
    As of  the effective  date of  this AD,  use Bombardier Repair Drawing
    8/4-32-099,  Issue  4,  dated September  4,  2018,  and UTC  Aerospace
    Systems Service  Concession Request  026-09, Revision  H, dated August
    29, 2018, to repair cracking  found during any inspection required  by
    this paragraph.

(h) NEW REQUIREMENT OF THIS AD: INSTALLATION OF ELBOW RESTRICTOR

    Within 2,000 flight hours or 12 months,  whichever occurs first,  from
    the  effective date  of this AD:  Install  an  elbow  restrictor,  P/N
    46610-1, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., "Procedure," of the Accom-
    plishment  Instructions  of   Bombardier  Service  Bulletin  84-32-69,
    Revision C, dated January 20, 2011.

(i) TERMINATING ACTIONS

(1) Installation of an elbow restrictor  as required  by  paragraph (h) of
    this AD terminates  the repetitive inspection  requirements  of  para-
    graphs (g)(1) and (7) of this AD.

(2) Installation of an elbow restrictor  as required  by  paragraph (h) of
    this AD  terminates the replacement  of  the  forward stabilizer brace
    assembly requirement of paragraph (g)(4)(iii) of this AD.

(j) NEW REQUIREMENT OF THIS AD:  REVISED REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS OF THE MLG
    FORWARD STABILIZER BRACE

(1) Within 2,000 flight cycles  after the installation specified  in para-
    graph (h) of this AD,  or  within 12 months  after the effective date,
    whichever occurs later,  do the non-destructive inspection, in accord-
    ance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 4 dated September
    4, 2018,  and UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09,
    Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. Thereafter, repeat the non-destruc-
    tive inspection at the times specified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.

(2) Repeat the non-destructive inspection  required in paragraph (j)(1) of
    this AD at the applicable intervals  specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i)
    through (iii) of this AD.

(i) For forward stabilizer braces, P/N 46401-7,  that have not had any re-
    quired rework done,  as specified in Goodrich or UTC Aerospace Systems
    Service  Concession  Request  026-09,  Section C or D,  and  have  had
    Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69  or  Bombardier  Service Bulletin
    84-32-76 incorporated:  Do the non-destructive inspection at intervals
    not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles.

(ii) For forward stabilizer braces P/N 46401-7, that have been reworked in
     accordance with Goodrich or  UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
     Request 026-09,  Section D,  and have had Bombardier Service Bulletin
     84-32-69 or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 incorporated: Do the
     non-destructive inspection  at  intervals  not to exceed 6,000 flight
     cycles.

(iii) For forward stabilizer braces, P/N 46401-7,  that have been reworked
      in accordance  with Goodrich  or  UTC Aerospace Systems Service Con-
      cession Request 026-09,  Section C,  and have had Bombardier Service
      Bulletin 84-32-69  or  Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 incorpo-
      rated:  Do the non-destructive inspection at intervals not to exceed
      3,000 flight cycles.

(k) ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE FOR PARAGRAPH (H) OF THIS AD

    Replacing the standard elbow fitting  at the retract port  of the lock
    actuator with a new custom elbow fitting in accordance  with paragraph
    3.B.,  "Procedure,"  of the Accomplishment Instructions  of Bombardier
    Service Bulletin 84-32-76,  Revision B,  dated August 1, 2018,  is  an
    acceptable method of compliance for the installation required by para-
    graph (h) of this AD.

(l) CREDIT FOR PREVIOUS ACTIONS

(1) This paragraph provides credit  for actions required  by paragraph (h)
    of this AD,  if those actions were performed before the effective date
    of this AD  using the service information  in one of paragraphs (l)(1)
    (i) through (iii) of this AD.

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69, dated June 30, 2009.

(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69,  Revision A,  dated  August 19,
     2009.

(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69 Revision B, dated September 17,
      2009.

(2) This paragraph provides credit for actions specified  in paragraph (j)
    of this AD,  if those actions were performed before the effective date
    of this AD  using the service information  in one of paragraphs (l)(2)
    (i) through (iii) of this AD.

(i) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099,  Issue 1,  dated March 10, 2009,
    and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09 Revision B, dated March
    10, 2009.

(ii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 2,  dated April 20, 2009,
     and  Goodrich  Service Concession Request 026-09,  Revision C,  dated
     April 17, 2009.

(iii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 3, dated December 3, 2009
      and  Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,  Revision D,  dated
      November 27, 2009.

(3) This paragraph provides credit for actions performed  using the method
    of compliance specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, if those  actions
    were performed before the effective date of this AD using the  service
    information in paragraph (l)(3)(i) or (ii) of this AD.

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76, dated May 20, 2010.

(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 Revision A, dated June 19, 2014.

(m) OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs):  The Manager,  New York ACO
    Branch,  FAA,  has  the authority  to approve  AMOCs for  this AD,  if
    requested using the  procedures found in  14 CFR 39.19.  In accordance
    with 14 CFR  39.19, send your  request to your  principal inspector or
    local Flight  Standards District  Office, as  appropriate. If  sending
    information directly to the manager of the certification office,  send
    it to ATTN: Program  Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,  FAA, New
    York ACO Branch. AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD  2009
    -09-02 are  approved as  AMOCs for  the corresponding  requirements in
    paragraph (g) of this AD.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer:  For any requirement in this AD to obtain
    corrective  actions   from  a   manufacturer,  the   action  must   be
    accomplished using  a method  approved by  the Manager,  New York  ACO
    Branch, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA DAO; or De  Havilland
    Aircraft of  Canada Limited's  TCCA DAO.  If approved  by the DAO, the
    approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(n) RELATED INFORMATION

(1) Refer   to   Mandatory  Continuing  Airworthiness  Information  (MCAI)
    Canadian AD CF-2009-11R2, dated May 31, 2018, for related information.
    This MCAI may be found in the AD docket  on  the  internet at https://
    www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
    0479.

(2) For more information about this AD,  contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace
    Engineer,  Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section,  FAA, New York ACO
    Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;  telephone
    516-228-7330; fax 516-794-5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.

(3) Service information  identified in this AD that is not incorporated by
    reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (o)(5)
    and (6) of this AD.

(o) MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

(1) The Director of the Federal Register  approved  the  incorporation  by
    reference (IBR) of  the service information  listed in this  paragraph
    under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use  this service information as applicable to do the actions
    required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.

(3) The following service information was approved  for IBR  on January 9,
    2020.

(i) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018.

(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69,  Revision C,  dated January 20,
     2011.

(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76,  Revision B,  dated  August 1,
      2018.

(iv) UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09,  Revision H,
     dated August 29, 2018.

(4) The following service information was approved  for IBR on May 6, 2009
    (75 FR 18121, April 21, 2009).

(i) Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 338, dated February 23, 2009. The
    issue date is specified on only the first page of this document.

(ii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1,  dated March 10, 2009.
     The issue date is specified on only the first page of this document.

(iii) Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision B,  dated March
      10, 2009.  Pages 1 through 8 of  this  document  are  identified  as
      Revision B,  dated March 5, 2009;  pages 9 through 22 are identified
      as Revision B, dated March 10, 2009.

(5) For service information identified  in this AD,  contact  De Havilland
    Aircraft of Canada Limited,  Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
    Boulevard,  Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;  telephone 416-375-4000;
    fax   416-375-4539;   email  thd@dehavilland.com;   internet  https://
    dehavilland.com.

(6) You may view this service information at the FAA,  Transport Standards
    Branch,  2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.  For information on the
    availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.

(7) You  may  view  this  service  information  that  is  incorporated  by
    reference at the National Archives and Records Administration  (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material  at  NARA,  email
    fedreg.legal@nara.gov,  or  go  to:  https://www.archives.gov/federal-
    register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Issued in Des Moines, Washington,  on November 7, 2019.  Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,  Air-
frame and Mechanical Systems Section,  FAA,  New  York  ACO  Branch,  1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7330; fax
516-794-5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
PREAMBLE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0479; Product Identifier 2019-NM-020-AD; Amendment
39-19790; AD 2019-22-11]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2009-09-
02, which applied to certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes. AD 2009-09-02 required repetitive inspections for damage of
certain main landing gear (MLG) forward stabilizer brace assemblies,
repetitive inspections for cracking of both MLG forward stabilizer
braces, liquid penetrant inspections for cracking, and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD retains the existing actions and also
requires installation of an elbow restrictor. This AD was prompted by
reports of failures of the aft hinge of the MLG forward stabilizer
brace due to fatigue cracks. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 9, 2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 9,
2020.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of May 6,
2009 (74 FR 18121, April 21, 2009).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, Q-Series Technical
Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone 416-375-4000; fax 416-375-4539; email thd@dehavilland.com;
internet https://dehavilland.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0479.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.
gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0479; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7330;
fax 516-794-5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2009-11R2, dated May
31, 2018 (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0479.
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2009-09-02, Amendment 39-15888 (74 FR
18121, April 21, 2009) (``AD 2009-09-02''). AD 2009-09-02 applied to
certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on July 12, 2019 (84 FR 33185). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of failures of the aft hinge of the MLG forward
stabilizer brace due to fatigue cracks. The NPRM proposed to continue
to require inspections for damage (including excessive wear, corrosion,
foreign object damage, and cracking) of certain MLG forward stabilizer
brace assemblies and applicable corrective actions; and repetitive
inspections for cracking of both MLG forward stabilizer braces,
applicable liquid penetrant inspections for cracking, and corrective
actions if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to require installation of
an elbow restrictor. The FAA is issuing this AD to address failure of
the stabilizer brace, which could result in the collapse of the MLG.
See the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA) stated its
support for the NPRM.

Request To Exclude Certain Service Information Procedures

Horizon Air requested that paragraphs (h) and (k) of the proposed
AD refer specifically to paragraph 3.B., ``Procedure,'' in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the referenced service information
rather than ``the Accomplishment Instructions.'' Horizon Air stated
that the ``Job-Set Up'' and ``Close Out'' procedures in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information do
not directly correct the unsafe condition.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's request for the reason provided
above. The FAA has revised paragraphs (h) and (k) of this AD to require
accomplishment of paragraph 3.B., ``Procedure,'' of the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service information.

Explanation of Additional Change Made to This Final Rule

The FAA has revised this final rule to identify the legal name of
the manufacturer, De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, as published
in the most recent type certificate data sheet for the affected
airplane model.

Conclusion

The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51


Bombardier has issued the following service information.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69, Revision C, dated
January 20, 2011, which describes procedures for replacing the standard
elbow fitting with a new restrictor elbow fitting.
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76, Revision B, dated
August 1, 2018, which describes procedures for replacing the standard
elbow fitting with a new restrictor elbow fitting and introduction of a
new configuration stabilizer brace assembly.
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 4, dated
September 4, 2018, which describes, among other actions, procedures for
inspections for cracking of the apex lug stop on the MLG forward
stabilizer brace assembly.
UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, which describes, among other
actions, procedures for inspections for excessive wear of the apex pins
on the MLG forward stabilizer brace assembly.
This AD also requires the following service information, which the
Director of the Federal Register approved for incorporation by
reference as of May 6, 2009 (75 FR 18121, April 21, 2009).
Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 338, dated February
23, 2009.
Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1, dated March
10, 2009.
Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision B,
dated March 10, 2009.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

The FAA estimates that this AD affects 54 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

Estimated Costs for Required Actions

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
Retained actions from AD 2009-09-02 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $680 $0 $680 $36,720
New actions 19 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,615 10,867 12,482 674,028

The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable it to
provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this
AD.
According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs
in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

The FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39


Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]


2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009-09-02, Amendment 39-15888 (74 FR 18121, April 21, 2009), and
adding the following new AD: