| preamble attached >>> |
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
|
| 2019-22-11 |
DE HAVILLAND AIRCRAFT OF CANADA LIMITED (TYPE CERTIFICATE
PREVIOUSLY HELD BY BOMBARDIER, INC.): Amendment 39-19790; Docket No. FAA-2019-0479; Product Identifier 2019-NM-020-AD. |
(a) EFFECTIVE DATE
This AD is effective January 9, 2020.
(b) AFFECTED ADS
This AD replaces AD 2009-09-02, Amendment 39-15888 (74 FR 18121, April
21, 2009) ("AD 2009-09-02").
(c) APPLICABILITY
This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400, -401
and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 4001,
4003, and subsequent, equipped with main landing gear (MLG) forward
stabilizer brace part number (P/N) 46401-7.
(d) SUBJECT
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Main landing gear.
(e) REASON
This AD was prompted by reports of failures of the aft hinge of the
MLG forward stabilizer brace due to fatigue cracks. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address failure of the stabilizer brace, which could result
in the collapse of the MLG.
(f) COMPLIANCE
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless
already done.
(g) RETAINED INSPECTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS WITH REVISED SERVICE INFOR-
MATION AND REMOVED REPORTING REQUIREMENT
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD 2009-
09-02, with new service information and removed reporting requirement.
Unless already done, do the following actions:
(1) At the applicable time specified in one of paragraphs (g)(1)(i)
through (iv) of this AD: Perform non-destructive inspections for
damage of the MLG forward stabilizer brace assemblies P/N 46401-7, in
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1, dated
March 10, 2009, and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32
-099, Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018, and UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,000
flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, use Bombardier
Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018, and UTC
Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated
August 29, 2018, for the actions required by this paragraph.
(i) For airplanes with MLG forward stabilizer braces that have accumulated
12,000 or more total flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the effective
date of AD 2009-09-02): Inspect within 50 flight cycles after May 6,
2009.
(ii) For airplanes with MLG forward stabilizer braces that have accumu-
lated 9,000 or more total flight cycles but fewer than 12,000 total
flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-09-02)
Inspect before the accumulation of 12,050 total flight cycles, or
within 500 flight cycles after May 6, 2009, whichever occurs earlier.
(iii) For airplanes with MLG forward stabilizer braces that have accumu-
lated 4,500 or more total flight cycles but fewer than 9,000 total
flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-09-
02): Inspect before the accumulation of 9,500 total flight cycles,
or within 1,500 flight cycles after May 6, 2009, whichever occurs
earlier.
(iv) For airplanes with MLG forward stabilizer braces that have accumu-
lated fewer than 4,500 total flight cycles as of May 6, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2009-09-02): Inspect before the accumulation of
6,000 total flight cycles.
(2) If any damage is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g)
(1) of this AD, before further flight, do all applicable corrective
actions in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or UTC Aerospace Systems Service
Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018; except
as provided by paragraphs (g)(3) through (6) of this AD. As of the
effective date of this AD use UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions re-
quired by this paragraph.
(3) For airplanes on which step 24. of Goodrich Service Concession Request
026-09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009, has been done: Within 1,200
flight cycles after May 6, 2009 (the effective date of AD 2009-09-02),
rework the MLG forward stabilizer brace, and except for airplanes on
which the rework has been done, within 600 flight cycles after May 6,
2009, do a detailed visual inspection for damage of the stabilizer
brace apex lugs in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request
026-09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.
If any damage is found, repair before further flight in accordance
with Section C of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision
B, dated March 10, 2009; or Section C of UTC Aerospace Systems Service
Concession Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. As of the
effective date of this AD use UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions re-
quired by this paragraph.
(4) At the applicable time specified in one of paragraphs (g)(4)(i)
through (iii) of this AD, replace the forward stabilizer brace
assembly, in accordance with Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-
09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or UTC Aerospace Systems Service
Concession Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. As of the
effective date of this AD, use UTC Aerospace Systems Service Conces-
sion Request 026-09 Revision H, dated August 29, 2018, for the actions
required by this paragraph.
(i) For airplanes on which cracking is found during any inspection re-
quired by this AD, and the cracking exceeds the limit specified in
paragraph (g)(4)(i)(A) or (B) of this AD, as applicable: Replace the
assembly before further flight.
(A) For cracking found before the effective date of this AD: The limit
specified in Section C of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009.
(B) For cracking found on or after the effective date of this AD: The
limit specified in Section C or Section D of UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.
(ii) For airplanes on which any cracking is found after the rework speci-
fied in Section C of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009 or specified in Section C or Section
D of UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09 Revision
H, dated August 29, 2018: Replace the assembly before further flight.
(iii) For airplanes on which no cracking is found after the rework speci-
fied in Section C of Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or specified in Section C or
Section D of UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09
Revision H, dated August 29, 2018: Replace the assembly within 2,700
flight cycles after doing the rework.
(5) If foreign object damage is found during any inspection required by
this AD, or if damage is found to a forward stabilizer brace lug or
stop bracket retention hole apex bushing, before further flight, re-
pair using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA;
or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA
Design Approval Organization (DAO); or De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited's TCCA DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval must include
the DAO-authorized signature.
(6) If any crack is found during the visual inspection under 10X magnifi-
cation, repair before further flight, in accordance with Goodrich
Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision B, dated March 10, 2009;
or UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H
dated August 29, 2018. As of the effective date of this AD, use UTC
Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated
August 29, 2018, for the actions required by this paragraph.
(7) Before the accumulation of 6,000 total flight cycles on the MLG for-
ward stabilizer braces, or within 600 flight hours after May 6, 2009
(the effective date of AD 2009-09-02), whichever occurs later: Do a
detailed visual inspection for cracking of both MLG forward stabilizer
braces and do all applicable liquid penetrant inspections for
cracking, in accordance with Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 338,
dated February 23, 2009. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 600 flight hours. If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this paragraph, repair before further flight in
accordance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1, dated
March 10, 2009, and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision B, dated March 10, 2009; or Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32
-099, Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018, and UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August 29, 2018.
As of the effective date of this AD, use Bombardier Repair Drawing
8/4-32-099, Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018, and UTC Aerospace
Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H, dated August
29, 2018, to repair cracking found during any inspection required by
this paragraph.
(h) NEW REQUIREMENT OF THIS AD: INSTALLATION OF ELBOW RESTRICTOR
Within 2,000 flight hours or 12 months, whichever occurs first, from
the effective date of this AD: Install an elbow restrictor, P/N
46610-1, in accordance with paragraph 3.B., "Procedure," of the Accom-
plishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69,
Revision C, dated January 20, 2011.
(i) TERMINATING ACTIONS
(1) Installation of an elbow restrictor as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD terminates the repetitive inspection requirements of para-
graphs (g)(1) and (7) of this AD.
(2) Installation of an elbow restrictor as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD terminates the replacement of the forward stabilizer brace
assembly requirement of paragraph (g)(4)(iii) of this AD.
(j) NEW REQUIREMENT OF THIS AD: REVISED REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS OF THE MLG
FORWARD STABILIZER BRACE
(1) Within 2,000 flight cycles after the installation specified in para-
graph (h) of this AD, or within 12 months after the effective date,
whichever occurs later, do the non-destructive inspection, in accord-
ance with Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 4 dated September
4, 2018, and UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09,
Revision H, dated August 29, 2018. Thereafter, repeat the non-destruc-
tive inspection at the times specified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
(2) Repeat the non-destructive inspection required in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD at the applicable intervals specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i)
through (iii) of this AD.
(i) For forward stabilizer braces, P/N 46401-7, that have not had any re-
quired rework done, as specified in Goodrich or UTC Aerospace Systems
Service Concession Request 026-09, Section C or D, and have had
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69 or Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-32-76 incorporated: Do the non-destructive inspection at intervals
not to exceed 6,000 flight cycles.
(ii) For forward stabilizer braces P/N 46401-7, that have been reworked in
accordance with Goodrich or UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession
Request 026-09, Section D, and have had Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-32-69 or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 incorporated: Do the
non-destructive inspection at intervals not to exceed 6,000 flight
cycles.
(iii) For forward stabilizer braces, P/N 46401-7, that have been reworked
in accordance with Goodrich or UTC Aerospace Systems Service Con-
cession Request 026-09, Section C, and have had Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-32-69 or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 incorpo-
rated: Do the non-destructive inspection at intervals not to exceed
3,000 flight cycles.
(k) ACCEPTABLE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE FOR PARAGRAPH (H) OF THIS AD
Replacing the standard elbow fitting at the retract port of the lock
actuator with a new custom elbow fitting in accordance with paragraph
3.B., "Procedure," of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-76, Revision B, dated August 1, 2018, is an
acceptable method of compliance for the installation required by para-
graph (h) of this AD.
(l) CREDIT FOR PREVIOUS ACTIONS
(1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (h)
of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date
of this AD using the service information in one of paragraphs (l)(1)
(i) through (iii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69, dated June 30, 2009.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69, Revision A, dated August 19,
2009.
(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69 Revision B, dated September 17,
2009.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for actions specified in paragraph (j)
of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date
of this AD using the service information in one of paragraphs (l)(2)
(i) through (iii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1, dated March 10, 2009,
and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09 Revision B, dated March
10, 2009.
(ii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 2, dated April 20, 2009,
and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision C, dated
April 17, 2009.
(iii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 3, dated December 3, 2009
and Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision D, dated
November 27, 2009.
(3) This paragraph provides credit for actions performed using the method
of compliance specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, if those actions
were performed before the effective date of this AD using the service
information in paragraph (l)(3)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76, dated May 20, 2010.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76 Revision A, dated June 19, 2014.
(m) OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance
with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or
local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the certification office, send
it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch. AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2009
-09-02 are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA DAO; or De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited's TCCA DAO. If approved by the DAO, the
approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(n) RELATED INFORMATION
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Canadian AD CF-2009-11R2, dated May 31, 2018, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0479.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516-228-7330; fax 516-794-5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
(3) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by
reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (o)(5)
and (6) of this AD.
(o) MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions
required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on January 9,
2020.
(i) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099 Issue 4, dated September 4, 2018.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-69, Revision C, dated January 20,
2011.
(iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-76, Revision B, dated August 1,
2018.
(iv) UTC Aerospace Systems Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision H,
dated August 29, 2018.
(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on May 6, 2009
(75 FR 18121, April 21, 2009).
(i) Bombardier Q400 All Operator Message 338, dated February 23, 2009. The
issue date is specified on only the first page of this document.
(ii) Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-099, Issue 1, dated March 10, 2009.
The issue date is specified on only the first page of this document.
(iii) Goodrich Service Concession Request 026-09, Revision B, dated March
10, 2009. Pages 1 through 8 of this document are identified as
Revision B, dated March 5, 2009; pages 9 through 22 are identified
as Revision B, dated March 10, 2009.
(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited, Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000;
fax 416-375-4539; email thd@dehavilland.com; internet https://
dehavilland.com.
(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on November 7, 2019. Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer, Air-
frame and Mechanical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7330; fax
516-794-5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
| PREAMBLE |
|
|
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The FAA has received no definitive
data that would enable it to |