preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD BOMBARDIER, INC.: Docket No. FAA-2018-0635; Product Identifier 2017-NM-183-AD.
(a) COMMENTS DUE DATE

    We must receive comments by September 6, 2018.

(b) AFFECTED ADS

    None.

(c) APPLICABILITY

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc, Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201,
    -202, -301, -311, and -315 airplanes,  certificated  in  any category,
    serial numbers 003 through 540 inclusive,  on which Bombardier Service
    Bulletin 8-74-02, dated March 3, 2000 or Revision A, dated January 27,
    2014;  has been accomplished concurrently with or after accomplishment
    of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-76-35 or 8-76-24.

(d) SUBJECT

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 74, Ignition; 76, Eng-
    ine Controls.

(e) REASON

    This AD was prompted  by a report that  a certain modification to  the
    auto relight system is incompatible with a certain beta lockout system
    modification and could  result in de-activation  of the auto  ignition
    feature  of  the No.  2  engine. We  are  issuing this  AD  to prevent
    unintentional de-activation of the auto ignition feature of the No.  2
    engine when the beta lockout  system is activated, which could  result
    in an uncommanded in-flight shutdown of the No. 2 engine.

(f) COMPLIANCE

    Comply  with this  AD within  the compliance  times specified,  unless
    already done.

(g) INSPECTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

    Within 6000 flight hours or  36 months, whichever occurs first,  after
    the effective date of this AD, inspect and, as applicable, rectify the
    auto   ignition   system  in   accordance   with  the   Accomplishment
    Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-74-07,  dated  April 13,
    2016.

(h) CREDIT FOR PREVIOUS ACTIONS

    This paragraph provides credit for rectification required by paragraph
    (g) of this AD, if  those actions were performed before  the effective
    date of this AD  using Bombardier In-Service Modification IS8Q7400001,
    Revision C, dated November 27, 2015.

(i) OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs):  The Manager,  New York ACO
    Branch,  FAA,  has  the authority  to approve  AMOCs for  this AD,  if
    requested using the  procedures found in  14 CFR 39.19.  In accordance
    with 14 CFR  39.19, send your  request to your  principal inspector or
    local Flight  Standards District  Office, as  appropriate. If  sending
    information directly to the manager of the certification office,  send
    it to ATTN: Program  Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,  FAA, New
    York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart  Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY  11590;
    telephone 516-228-7300;  fax 516-794-5531.  Before using  any approved
    AMOC,  notify  your  appropriate  principal  inspector,  or  lacking a
    principal  inspector,  the  manager  of  the  local  flight  standards
    district office/certificate holding district office.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer:  For any requirement in this AD to obtain
    corrective  actions   from  a   manufacturer,  the   action  must   be
    accomplished using  a method  approved by  the Manager,  New York  ACO
    Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier,
    Inc.'s TCCA  Design Approval  Organization (DAO).  If approved  by the
    DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) RELATED INFORMATION

(1) Refer   to   Mandatory  Continuing  Airworthiness  Information  (MCAI)
    Canadian AD CF-2017-21R1 dated June 28, 2017, for related information.
    This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.
    regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0635

(2) For more information about this AD,  contact Anthony Flores, Aerospace
    Engineer,  Propulsion  and  Program  Management  Section,  Chicago ACO
    Branch, Room 107, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; tele-
    phone 847-294-7140; fax 847-294-7834.

(3) For information about AMOCs, contact Joe Catanzaro, Aerospace Engineer
    Propulsion Section,  FAA,  New York  ACO Branch,  1600 Stewart Avenue,
    Suite 410,  Westbury, NY 11590;  telephone 516-228-7366;  fax 516-794-
    5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.

(4) For  service information identified  in this AD,  contact  Bombardier,
    Inc.,  Q-Series Technical Help Desk,  123 Garratt Boulevard,  Toronto,
    Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000;  fax 416-375-4539; e-
    mail thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;  internet http://www.bombardier.
    com.  You  may  view this  service information  at the  FAA, Transport
    Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St, Des Moines, WA. For information
    on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.

Issued  in  Des Moines, Washington,  on  July 13, 2018.  Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director,  System Oversight Division,  Aircraft Certification Serv-
ice.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 6, 2018.
PREAMBLE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0635; Product Identifier 2017-NM-183-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-102, -103, and -106 airplanes;
Model DHC-8-200 series airplanes; and Model DHC-8-300 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report that a certain modification
to the auto relight system is incompatible with a certain beta lockout
system modification and could result in de-activation of the auto
ignition feature of the No. 2 engine. This proposed AD would require an
inspection of the auto ignition system and applicable rectification. We
are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 6, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-4000; fax 416-375-
4539; email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; internet http://www.
bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St, Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.
gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0635;
or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Flores, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Program Management Section, Chicago ACO Branch, Room
107, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; telephone 847-294-
7140; fax 847-294-7834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2018-0635;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-183-AD" at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.

Discussion

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2017-21R1, dated June
28, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or "the MCAI"), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-102, -103, and -106
airplanes; Model DHC-8-200 series airplanes; and Model DHC-8-300 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:

During the incorporation of the Auto Relight modification per
Bombardier SB [Service Bulletin] 8-74-02 on an aeroplane with a Beta
Lockout System (BLS) installed, it was noticed that if SB 8-74-02 is
incorporated in conjunction with, or after the incorporation of BLS
SB 8-76-35 ([Canadian] AD CF-2013-15) or SB 8-76-24 (FAA AD 2000-02-
13 [Amendment 39-11531 (65 FR 4095, January 26, 2000)]), the #2
engine auto ignition function of the beta lockout system will not be
available when the beta lockout system is activated. This condition,
if not corrected, may result in a #2 engine uncommanded in-flight
shut down.

To preclude any future occurrence of the noted deficiency,
Bombardier has issued SB 8-74-02 Revision B to highlight its
incompatibility with post SB 8-76-35 or 8-76-24 BLS compliant
aeroplanes. In addition, Bombardier issued a new SB, 8-74-06 for
Auto Relight System modification that can be incorporated in
conjunction with or on those aeroplanes that were previously modified
per SB 8-76-35 or 8-76-24.

To address this potentially unsafe condition, Bombardier has
also issued SB 8-74-07 to inspect and rectify the system wiring on
affected aeroplanes.

The original version of this [Canadian] AD was issued to mandate
compliance with the SB 8-74-07 requirements.

Revision 1 of this [Canadian] AD is issued to clarify the
Applicability section and correct a typographic error in the SB
number referenced in the Corrective Action section of the original
[Canadian] AD.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.
regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0635.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

Bombardier, Inc., has issued Service Bulletin 8-74-07, dated April
13, 2016. The service information describes an inspection to determine
correct operation of the auto ignition system for airplanes on which a
beta lockout system was installed, and rectification to re-activate a
previously disabled auto ignition system that will address inadvertent
de-activation of the auto ignition feature. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this proposed AD affects 185 airplanes of U.S. registry.

We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

Estimated Costs

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
Inspection 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 None $85 $15,725

We estimate the following costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on the results of the proposed
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need this action:

On-Condition Costs

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
Rectification 3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255 $6 $261

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs," describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
"Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order
12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and

4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):