preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
2017-10-01 DASSAULT AVIATION: Amendment 39-18875; Docket No. FAA-2016-9303; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-093-AD.
(a) EFFECTIVE DATE

    This AD is effective June 13, 2017.

(b) AFFECTED ADS

    None.

(c) APPLICABILITY

    This AD applies to the Dassault Aviation airplanes  specified in para-
    graphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category, all
    manufacturer serial numbers.

(1) Model  FAN JET FALCON and FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G air-
    planes.

(2) Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5 airplanes.

(d) SUBJECT

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) REASON

    This AD was prompted by a determination that inspections  for discrep-
    ancies of the fuselage bulkhead at frame (FR) 33 are necessary. We are
    issuing this AD  to detect and  correct discrepancies of  the fuselage
    bulkhead; such  discrepancies could  result in  the deterioration  and
    subsequent  failure  of  the bulkhead,  which  could  result in  rapid
    decompression of the airplane and consequent injury to occupants.

(f) COMPLIANCE

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,  unless al-
    ready done.

(g) REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS

    Before exceeding 5,000 total flight  cycles since first flight of  the
    airplane, or within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this
    AD, whichever occurs later: Do a detailed inspection for discrepancies
    of the  fuselage bulkhead  at FR  33 using  a method  approved by  the
    Manager,   International    Branch,   ANM-116,    Transport   Airplane
    Directorate, FAA; or  the European Aviation  Safety Agency (EASA);  or
    Dassault  Aviation's  EASA  Design  Organization  Approval  (DOA).  If
    approved  by the  DOA, the  approval must  include the  DOA-authorized
    signature. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
    5,000 flight cycles.

(h) REPAIR

    If  any  discrepancy  is  found  during  any  inspection  required  by
    paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, repair using a method
    approved  by  the Manager,  International  Branch, ANM-116,  Transport
    Airplane Directorate, FAA;  or the EASA;  or Dassault Aviation's  EASA
    DOA.  If  approved by  the  DOA, the  approval  must include  the  DOA
    -authorized  signature.  Repair of  an  airplane as  required  by this
    paragraph does  not constitute  terminating action  for the repetitive
    actions  required  by  paragraph  (g)  of  this  AD,  unless specified
    otherwise in the repair instructions.

(i) OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs):  The Manager, International
    Branch,  ANM-116,  Transport   Airplane  Directorate,  FAA,   has  the
    authority  to  approve  AMOCs  for this  AD,  if  requested  using the
    procedures found  in 14  CFR 39.19.  In accordance  with 14 CFR 39.19,
    send  your  request  to  your  principal  inspector  or  local  Flight
    Standards  District  Office, as  appropriate.  If sending  information
    directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom  Rodriguez,
    Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport  Airplane
    Directorate,  FAA,  1601  Lind  Avenue  SW.,  Renton,  WA  98057-3356;
    telephone: 425-227-1137; fax: 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed
    to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before  using any approved  AMOC,
    notify your  appropriate principal  inspector, or  lacking a principal
    inspector,  the  manager  of  the  local  flight  standards   district
    office/certificate holding district office.

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer:  For any requirement in this AD to obtain
    corrective  actions   from  a   manufacturer,  the   action  must   be
    accomplished using  a method  approved by  the Manager,  International
    Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA;  or
    Dassault Aviation's  EASA DOA.  If approved  by the  DOA, the approval
    must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(j) RELATED INFORMATION

    Refer  to  Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)  EASA
    Airworthiness Directive 2016-0096, dated May 19, 2016, for related in-
    formation.  This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at
    http://www.regulations.gov  by searching for  and  locating Docket No.
    FAA-2016-9303.

(k) MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

    None.

Issued  in  Renton, Washington,  on May 1, 2017.  Michael Kaszycki, Acting
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, Inter-
national Branch,  ANM-116,  Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;  telephone: 425-227-1137; fax: 425-227-
1149.
PREAMBLE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9303; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-093-AD;
Amendment 39-18875; AD 2017-10-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON airplanes; all Model FAN JET
FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; and all Model MYSTERE-FALCON
20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
determination that inspections for discrepancies of the fuselage
bulkhead are necessary. This AD requires repetitive inspections for
discrepancies of the fuselage bulkhead, and repair if
necessary. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES:

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.
gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9303; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-1137;
fax: 425-227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Dassault Aviation Model
FAN JET FALCON airplanes; all Model FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F,
and G airplanes; and all Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and
20-F5 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on November
1, 2016 (81 FR 75757) (``the NPRM'').
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2016-0096, dated May 19, 2016 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Dassault Aviation
Model FAN JET FALCON airplanes; all Model FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D,
E, F, and G airplanes; and all Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-
E5, and 20-F5 airplanes. The MCAI states:

A detailed inspection (DET) of the fuselage bulkhead at frame
(FR) 33 is established through a subset of inspection/check
maintenance procedure referenced in the applicable aircraft
maintenance manual (AMM), task 53-10-0-6 ``MAIN FRAME--INSPECTION/
CHECK'', with periodicity established in Chapter 5-10, at every C-
Check. Failure to accomplish this DET could lead to deterioration of
the affected structure.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
bulkhead failure, possibly resulting in a rapid depressurization of
the aeroplane and consequent injury to occupants.
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive DET of the bulkhead at FR33 [for discrepancies, such as
buckling, deformations, cracks, loose countersinks, scratches,
dents, and corrosion], and depending on findings, repair of the
affected structure.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9303.

Comments

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comment received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to the single commenter.

Request To Reduce Compliance Time


The commenter, Mark Reiner, asked that the compliance time for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of the proposed AD be
reduced from 5,000 to 2,500 flight cycles. The commenter reasoned that
since so many airplanes are flying around the world and accumulating
numerous flight cycles, the chances of problems occurring on an
airplane are greatly increased.
We do not agree with the commenter's request. In developing an
appropriate compliance time for this action, we considered not only the
degree of urgency associated with addressing the subject unsafe
condition, but the manufacturer's recommendation for an appropriate
compliance time, and the practical aspect of accomplishing the
inspections within an interval of time that corresponds to the typical
scheduled maintenance for the majority of affected operators. Further,
we determined that the compliance time recommended by the manufacturer
and EASA, and the time required for the rulemaking process provide an
acceptable level of safety. Therefore, we have not changed this AD in
this regard.

Conclusion

We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 133 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it takes about 8 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $90,440, or $680 per product.
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):