preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD VARIOUS AIRCRAFT: Docket No. FAA-2014-1083; Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-036-AD.
(a) COMMENTS DUE DATE

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by February 17, 2015.

(b) AFFECTED ADS

    This AD supersedes  AD 99-01-05 R1,  Amendment 39-17688 (78  FR 79599,
    December 31,  2013) "AD  99-01-05 R1".  AD 99-26-19  R1, Amendment  39
    -17681 (78 FR 76040, December  16, 2013), also relates to  the subject
    of this AD.

(c) APPLICABILITY

    This AD applies to the  following airplanes identified in Table  1 and
    Table 2 to paragraph (c) of this AD, that are equipped with wing  lift
    struts, including airplanes  commonly known as  a "Clipped Wing  Cub,"
    which  modify  the  airplane primarily  by  removing  approximately 40
    inches of the  inboard portion of  each wing; and  are certificated in
    any category.

(1) Based on  optional engine installations  some airplanes may  have been
    re-identified or registered with another  model that is not listed  in
    the type certificate data sheet (TCDS). For instance, Piper Model  J3C
    -65 airplanes  are type  certificated on  Type Certificate  Data Sheet
    (TCDS) A-691 but may also  have been re-identified or registered  as a
    Model J3C-115, J3F-50, J3C-75,  J3C-75D, J3C-75S, J3L-75, J3C-85,  J3C
    -85S, J3C-90, J3F-90, J3F-90S, J3C-100, or J3-L4J airplane.

(2) The airplane model number on the affected airplane or its registry may
    or may not contain the dash (-),  e.g. J3 and J-3. This AD applies  to
    both variations.

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD--AIRPLANES PREVIOUSLY AFFECTED BY AD 99-01-05 R1
TYPE CERTIFICATE HOLDER
AIRCRAFT MODEL
SERIAL NO.
FS 2000 Corp L-14 All.
FS 2001 Corp J5A (Army L-4F), J5A-80, J5B (Army L-4G), J5C, AE-1, and HE-1 All.
FS 2002 Corporation PA-14 14-1 through 14-523.
FS 2003 Corporation PA-12 and PA-12S 12-1 through 12-4036.
LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA). PA-25, PA-25-235, and PA-25-260 25-1 through 25-8156024.
Piper Aircraft, Inc TG-8 (Army TG-8, Navy XLNP-1) All.
Piper Aircraft, Inc E-2 and F-2 All.
Piper Aircraft, Inc J3C-40, J3C-50, J3C-50S, J3C-65 (Army L-4, L-4B, L-4H, L-4J, Navy NE-1 and NE-2), J3C-65S, J3F-50, J3F-50S, J3F-60, J3F-60S, J3F-65 (Army L-4D), J3F-65S, J3L, J3L-S, J3L-65 (Army L-4C), and J3L-65S. All.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J4, J4A, J4A-S, and J4E (Army L-4E) 4-401 through 4-1649.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-11 and PA-11S 11-1 through 11-1678.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-15 15-1 through 15-388.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-16 and PA-16S 16-1 through 16-736.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-17 17-1 through 17-215.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-18, PA-18S, PA-18 ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA-18S ‘‘105’’ (Special), PA-18A, PA-18 ‘‘125’’ (Army L-21A), PA-18S ‘‘125’’, PA-18AS ‘‘125’’,PA-18 ‘‘135’’ (Army L-21B), PA-18A ‘‘135’’, PA-18S ‘‘135’’, PA-18AS ‘‘135’’, PA-18 ‘‘150’’, PA-18A ‘‘150’’, PA-18S ‘‘150’’, PA-18AS ‘‘150’’, PA-18A (Restricted), PA-18A ‘‘135’’ (Restricted), and PA-18A ‘‘150’’ (Restricted). 18-1 through 18-8309025, 18900 through 1809032, and 1809034 through 1809040.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-19 (Army L-18C), and PA-19S 18-1 through 18-7632 and 19-1, 19-2, and 19-3.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-20, PA-20S, PA-20 ‘‘115’’, PA-20S ‘‘115’’, PA-20 ‘‘135’’, and PA-20S ‘‘135’’ 20-1 through 20-1121.
Piper Aircraft, Inc PA-22, PA-22-108, PA-22-135, PA-22S-135, PA-22-150, PA-22S-150, PA-22-160, and PA-22S-160. 22-1 through 22-9848.
NOTE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD: There  is  a  serial  number   overlap
between the Piper PA-18 series  airplanes and the Piper Model  PA-19 (Army
L-18C) airplanes listed  in AD 99-01-05  R1 . Serial  numbers 18-1 through
18-7632 listed for  the PA-18 series  airplanes are also  now listed under
Model PA-19 (Army L-18C) and Model PA-19S.

TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD--AIRPLANES NEW TO THIS AD
TYPE CERTIFICATE HOLDER
AIRCRAFT MODEL
SERIAL NO.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J-3 1100 through 1200 and 1999 and up that were manufactured before October 15, 1939.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J3C-65 (Army L-4A). All.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J3P 2325, 2327, 2339, 2340, 2342, 2344, 2345, 2347, 2349, 2351, 2355 and up that were manufactured before January 10, 1942.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J4B 4-400 and up that were manufactured before December 11, 1942.
Piper Aircraft, Inc. J4F 4-828 and up.
(d) SUBJECT

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA)
    of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) UNSAFE CONDITION

(1) The subject of this AD was originally prompted by reports of corrosion
    damage  found  on  the  wing lift  struts.  AD  99-01-05  R1 is  being
    superseded to include certain Piper Aircraft, Inc. Models J-3,  J3C-65
    (Army  L4A),  J3P,  J4B, and  J4F  airplanes  that were  inadvertently
    omitted  from the  applicability, paragraph  (c), of  AD 99-01-05  and
    subsequently AD 99-01-05  R1. Also, there  is a serial  number overlap
    between Piper Model  PA-18s listed in  AD 99-01-05 R1  and Piper Model
    PA-19 (Army L-18C). Certain serial numbers listed for Model PA-18s are
    also listed under Model PA-19 (Army L-18C).

(2) AD 99-01-05  R1 was issued  to clarify the  FAA's intention that  if a
    sealed wing lift  strut assembly is  installed as a  replacement part,
    the repetitive inspection requirement  is terminated only if  the seal
    is never  improperly broken.  If the  seal is  improperly broken, then
    that  wing  lift  strut   becomes  subject  to  continued   repetitive
    inspections.  We did  not intend  to promote  drilling  holes  into or
    otherwise unsealing a  sealed strut. This  AD retains all  the actions
    currently required in AD 99-01-05 R1. There are no new requirements in
    this AD  except for  the addition  of certain  model airplanes  to the
    Applicability section of this AD.

(3) We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion and cracking on
    the front and rear wing lift  struts and forks, which could cause  the
    wing  lift  strut to  fail.  This failure  could  result in  the  wing
    separating from the airplane.

(f) COMPLIANCE

    Unless already done (compliance with AD 99-01-05 R1 and AD 93-  10-06,
    Amendment 39-8586 (58 FR 29965, May 25, 1993) "AD 93-010- 06"), do the
    following actions within the compliance times specified in  paragraphs
    (g)  through (m)  of this  AD, including  all subparagraphs.  Properly
    unsealing and resealing a sealed wing lift strut is still considered a
    terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of  this
    AD as long as all  appropriate regulations and issues are  considered,
    such  as static  strength, fatigue,  material effects,  immediate  and
    long-term  (internal  and  external)  corrosion  protection, resealing
    methods, etc. Current FAA regulations in 14 CFR 43.13(b) specify  that
    maintenance performed  will result  in the  part's condition  to be at
    least  equal  to  its  original  or  properly  altered  condition. Any
    maintenance actions  that unseal  a sealed  wing lift  strut should be
    coordinated  with  the  Atlanta  Aircraft  Certification  Office (ACO)
    through  the  local airworthiness  authority  (e.g., Flight  Standards
    District Office). There are provisions in paragraph (o) of this AD for
    approving such actions as an alternative method of  compliance (AMOC).

(g) REMOVE WING LIFT STRUTS

(1) For  all airplanes  previously affected  by AD  99-01-05 R1:  Within 1
    calendar month  after February  8, 1999  (the effective  date retained
    from AD 99-01-05, Amendment 39-10972 (63 FR 72132, December 31,  1998)
    "AD 99-01-05"), or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection
    done in accordance with AD 93-10-06 (which was superseded by AD  99-01
    -05), whichever occurs  later, remove the  wing lift struts  following
    Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin (Piper MSB)  No.
    528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10,
    1989, as applicable. Before further  flight after the removal, do  the
    actions in  one of  the following  paragraphs (h)(1),  (h)(2), (i)(1),
    (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD  99-01
    -05 R1): Within 1 calendar month  after the effective date of this  AD
    or  within  24  calendar  months after  the  last  inspection  done in
    accordance with AD  93-10-06 (which was  superseded  by AD  99-01-05),
    whichever occurs later,  remove the wing  lift struts following  Piper
    Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin (Piper MSB) No.  528D,
    dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989,
    as applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions
    in one of the following paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), (i)(1), (i)(2),  or
    (i)(3) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(h) INSPECT WING LIFT STRUTS

    For all airplanes listed in  this AD: Before further flight  after the
    removal required in paragraph (g)  of this AD, inspect each  wing lift
    strut following paragraph (h)(1) or  (h)(2) of this AD, including  all
    subparagraphs, or do the wing lift strut replacement following one  of
    the options in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD.

(1) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion and perceptible dents foll-
    owing Piper MSB  No. 528D, dated  October 19, 1990,  or Piper MSB  No.
    910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable.

(i) If no corrosion is visible  and no perceptible dents are found  on any
    wing lift strut during the inspection required in paragraph (h)(1)  of
    this AD, before further flight, apply corrosion inhibitor to each wing
    lift strut following  Piper MSB No.  528D, dated October  19, 1990, or
    Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989, as applicable.

    Repetitively thereafter inspect each wing lift strut at intervals  not
    to exceed  24 calendar  months following  the procedures  in paragraph
    (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(ii) If corrosion or  perceptible dents are found  on any wing lift  strut
     during the  inspection required  in paragraph  (h)(1) of  this AD  or
     during any repetitive inspection  required in paragraph (h)(1)(i)  of
     this AD, before further flight, replace the affected wing lift  strut
     with one of  the replacement options  specified in paragraph  (i)(1),
     (i)(2),  or  (i)(3) of  this  AD. Do  the  replacement following  the
     procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(2) Inspect each wing lift strut for corrosion following the procedures in
    the Appendix to this AD. This inspection must be done by a Level 2  or
    Level 3 inspector  certified using the  guidelines established by  the
    American Society for Non-destructive Testing or the "Military Standard
    for Nondestructive Testing Personnel Qualification and  Certification"
    (MIL-STD-410E),   which   can   be   found   on   the   Internet    at
    http://aerospacedefense.thomasnet.com/Asset/MIL-STD-410.pdf.

(i) If no corrosion is found on any wing lift strut during the  inspection
    required in paragraph  (h)(2) of this  AD and all  requirements in the
    Appendix to this  AD are met,  before further flight,  apply corrosion
    inhibitor to each wing lift strut following Piper MSB No. 528D,  dated
    October 19, 1990, or  Piper MSB No. 910A,  dated October 10, 1989,  as
    applicable. Repetitively  thereafter inspect  each wing  lift strut at
    intervals not to exceed 24 calendar months following the procedures in
    paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(ii) If corrosion is  found on any wing  lift strut during the  inspection
     required in  paragraph (h)(2)  of this  AD or  during any  repetitive
     inspection required  in paragraph  (h)(2)(i) of  this AD,  or if  any
     requirement in  the Appendix  of this  AD is  not met, before further
     flight  after  any inspection  in  which corrosion  is  found or  the
     Appendix requirements  are not  met, replace  the affected  wing lift
     strut  with one  of the  replacement options  specified in  paragraph
     (i)(1), (i)(2), or  (i)(3) of this  AD. Do the  replacement following
     the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(i) WING LIFT STRUT REPLACEMENT OPTIONS

    Before further flight after the  removal required in paragraph (g)  of
    this AD, replace the wing lift struts following one of the options  in
    paragraph  (i)(1),  (i)(2),  or  (i)(3)  of  this  AD,  including  all
    subparagraphs, or  inspect each  wing lift  strut following  paragraph
    (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.

(1) Install original  equipment manufacturer (OEM)  part number wing  lift
    struts  (or  FAA-approved  equivalent  part  numbers)  that  have been
    inspected  following  the  procedures in  either  paragraph  (h)(1) or
    (h)(2) of this  AD, including all  subparagraphs, and are  found to be
    airworthy. Do the  installations following Piper  MSB No. 528D,  dated
    October 19, 1990, or  Piper MSB No. 910A,  dated October 10, 1989,  as
    applicable. Repetitively thereafter  inspect the newly  installed wing
    lift struts at  intervals not to  exceed 24 calendar  months following
    the  procedures  in either  paragraph  (h)(1) or  (h)(2)  of this  AD,
    including all subparagraphs.

(2) Install new sealed wing  lift strut assemblies (or  FAA-approved equi-
    valent part  numbers) (these  sealed wing  lift strut  assemblies also
    include the wing lift strut forks) following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated
    October 19, 1990, and Piper MSB  No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989,  as
    applicable.  Installing  one  of  these  new  sealed  wing  lift strut
    assemblies  terminates  the  repetitive  inspection  requirements   in
    paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD, and the wing lift strut  fork
    removal, inspection, and replacement requirement in paragraphs (j) and
    (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs, for that wing lift  strut
    assembly.

(3) Install F. Atlee Dodge  wing lift strut assemblies following  F. Atlee
    Dodge Aircraft Services, Inc. Installation Instructions No. 3233-I for
    Modified Piper  Wing Lift  Struts Supplemental  Type Certificate (STC)
    SA4635NM, dated February 1, 1991, which  can be found  on the Internet
    at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/E726
    AAA2831BD20085256CC2000E3DB7?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa4635nm. Repetit-
    ively  thereafter  inspect the  newly  installed wing  lift  struts at
    intervals not to exceed 60 calendar months following the procedures in
    paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(j) REMOVE WING LIFT STRUT FORKS

(1) For all  airplanes previously affected  by AD 99-01-05  R1, except for
    Model PA-25, PA-25-235, and  PA-25-260 airplanes: Within the  next 100
    hours time-in-service (TIS) after February 8, 1999 (the effective date
    retained from  AD 99-01-05)  or within  500 hours  TIS after  the last
    inspection done in accordance  with AD 93-10-06 (which  was superseded
    by AD 99-01-05),  whichever occurs later,  remove the wing  lift strut
    forks (unless already replaced in accordance with paragraph (i)(2)  of
    this AD). Do the removal  following Piper MSB No. 528D,  dated October
    19,  1990,  or  Piper  MSB  No.  910A,  dated  October  10,  1989,  as
    applicable. Before further flight after the removal, do the actions in
    one of the following paragraphs (k)  or (l) of this AD, including  all
    subparagraphs.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD 99-01-
    05 R1): Within the next 100 hours TIS after the effective date of this
    AD  or  within  500  hours  TIS  after  the  last  inspection  done in
    accordance with  AD 93-10-06  (which was  superseded by  AD 99-01-05),
    whichever  occurs  later, remove  the  wing lift  strut  forks (unless
    already replaced in accordance with  paragraph (i)(2) of this AD).  Do
    the removal following Piper MSB  No. 528D, dated October 19,  1990, or
    Piper MSB  No. 910A,  dated October  10, 1989,  as applicable.  Before
    further  flight  after the  removal,  do the  actions  in one  of  the
    following  paragraphs   (k)  or   (l)  of   this  AD,   including  all
    subparagraphs.

(k) INSPECT AND REPLACE WING LIFT STRUT FORKS

    For all airplanes affected by this AD: Before further flight after the
    removal required in  paragraph (j) of  this AD, inspect  the wing lift
    strut  forks  following  paragraph  (k)  of  this  AD,  including  all
    subparagraphs, or do  the wing lift  strut fork replacement  following
    one of the options in  paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3), or  (l)(4) of
    this  AD, including  all subparagraphs.  Inspect the  wing lift  strut
    forks for  cracks using  magnetic particle  procedures, such  as those
    contained in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 43.13-1B, Chapter 5, which can
    be found on  the Internet  http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
    Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/99c827db9baac81b86256b4500596c4e/$FIL
    E/Chapter%2005.pdf. Repetitively thereafter  inspect at intervals  not
    to  exceed  500  hours  TIS  until  the  replacement  time requirement
    specified in paragraph (k)(2) or (k)(3) of this AD is reached provided
    no cracks are found.

(1) If cracks are found during any inspection required in paragraph (k) of
    this  AD or  during any  repetitive inspection  required in  paragraph
    (k)(2)  or  (k)(3) of  this  AD, before  further  flight, replace  the
    affected wing  lift strut  fork with  one of  the replacement  options
    specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2),  (l)(3), or (l)(4) of this  AD,
    including  all  subparagraphs.   Do  the  replacement   following  the
    procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.

(2) If no cracks are found during the initial inspection required in para-
    graph  (k) of  this AD  and the  airplane is  currently equipped  with
    floats  or  has been  equipped  with floats  at  any time  during  the
    previous  2,000  hours  TIS  since  the  wing  lift  strut  forks were
    installed, at or before accumulating 1,000 hours TIS on the wing  lift
    strut  forks,  replace the  wing  lift strut  forks  with one  of  the
    replacement options specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3),  or
    (l)(4) of  this AD,  including all  subparagraphs. Do  the replacement
    following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.
    Repetitively thereafter  inspect the  newly installed  wing lift strut
    forks  at  intervals  not  to  exceed  500  hours  TIS  following  the
    procedures  specified  in  paragraph (k)  of  this  AD, including  all
    subparagraphs.

(3) If no cracks are found during the initial inspection required in para-
    graph (k) of  this AD and  the airplane has  never been equipped  with
    floats during the previous 2,000  hours TIS since the wing  lift strut
    forks were installed, at or before accumulating 2,000 hours TIS on the
    wing lift strut forks, replace the  wing lift strut forks with one  of
    the replacement options specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2), (l)(3),
    or (l)(4) of this AD, including all subparagraphs. Do the  replacement
    following the procedures specified in those paragraphs, as applicable.
    Repetitively thereafter  inspect the  newly installed  wing lift strut
    forks  at  intervals  not  to  exceed  500  hours  TIS  following  the
    procedures  specified  in  paragraph (k)  of  this  AD, including  all
    subparagraphs.

(l) WING LIFT STRUT FORK REPLACEMENT OPTIONS

    Before further flight after the  removal required in paragraph (j)  of
    this  AD, replace  the wing  lift strut  forks  following  one of  the
    options in  paragraph (l)(1),  (l)(2), (l)(3),  or (l)(4)  of this AD,
    including  all subparagraphs,  or inspect  the wing  lift strut  forks
    following paragraph (k) of this AD, including all subparagraphs.

(1) Install new  OEM part number  wing lift strut  forks of the  same part
    numbers of the existing part (or FAA-approved equivalent part numbers)
    that  were manufactured  with rolled  threads. Wing  lift strut  forks
    manufactured with  machine (cut)  threads are  not to  be used. Do the
    installations following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or
    Piper  MSB  No.   910A,  dated  October   10,  1989,  as   applicable.
    Repetitively thereafter inspect and  replace the newly installed  wing
    lift strut forks  at intervals not  to exceed 500  hours TIS following
    the procedures specified  in paragraph (k)  of this AD,  including all
    subparagraphs.

(2) Install new sealed wing lift strut  assemblies  (or FAA-approved equi-
    valent part  numbers) (these  sealed wing  lift strut  assemblies also
    include the wing lift strut forks) following Piper MSB No. 528D, dated
    October 19, 1990, and Piper MSB  No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989,  as
    applicable. This installation may  have already been done  through the
    option specified  in paragraph  (i)(2) of  this AD.  Installing one of
    these new sealed wing lift strut assemblies terminates the  repetitive
    inspection requirements in  paragraphs (h)(1) and  (h)(2) of this  AD,
    and  the wing  lift strut  fork removal,  inspection, and  replacement
    requirements  in paragraphs  (j) and  (k) of  this AD,  including  all
    subparagraphs, for that wing lift strut assembly.

(3) For the airplanes specified  below, install Jensen Aircraft wing  lift
    strut fork assemblies specified below in the applicable STC  following
    Jensen  Aircraft  Installation Instructions  for  Modified Lift  Strut
    Fitting.  Installing  one of  these  wing lift  strut  fork assemblies
    terminates the repetitive inspection  requirement of this AD  only for
    that wing lift strut fork.  Repetitively inspect each wing lift  strut
    as specified in paragraph (h)(1)  or (h)(2) of this AD,  including all
    subparagraphs.

(i) For  Models PA-12  and PA-12S  airplanes: STC SA1583NM, which  can  be
    found on the  Internet at  http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
    Library/rgstc.nsf/0/2E708575849845B285256CC1008213CA?OpenDocument&High
    light=sa1583nm;

(ii) For Model PA-14 airplanes: STC SA1584NM, which  can  be found  on the
     Internet    at    http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
     rgstc.nsf/0/39872B814471737685256CC1008213D0?OpenDocument&Highlight=s
     a1584nm;

(iii) For Models PA-16 and PA-16S  airplanes: STC SA1590NM, which  can  be
      found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_
      Library/rgstc.nsf/0/B28C4162E30D941F85256CC1008213F6?OpenDocument&Hi
      ghlight=sa1590nm;

(iv) For Models  PA-18, PA-18S, PA-18 "105" (Special), PA-18S "105" (Spec-
     ial), PA-18A, PA-18 "125" (Army L-21A), PA-18S "125", PA-18AS  "125",
     PA-18 "135" (Army L-21B), PA-18A "135", PA-18S "135", PA-18AS  "135",
     PA-18  "150",  PA-18A  "150",  PA-18S  "150",  PA-18AS  "150", PA-18A
     (Restricted),   PA-18A   "135"   (Restricted),   and   PA-18A   "150"
     (Restricted )  airplanes:  STC SA1585NM,  which  can   be   found  on
     the Internet  at  http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
     rgstc.nsf/0/A2BE010FB1CA61A285256CC1008213D6?OpenDocument&Highlight=s
     a1585nm;

(v) For Models PA-20, PA-20S, PA-20 "115", PA-20S "115", PA-20 "135",  and
    PA-20S "135" airplanes: STC SA1586NM, which can be found on the Inter-
    net at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgstc.nsf/0/
    873CC69D42C87CF585256CC1008213DC?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa1586nm;  and

(vi) For Model PA-22  airplanes: STC SA1587NM, which  can be found on  the
     Internet    at    http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
     rgstc.nsf/0/B051D04CCC0BED7E85256CC1008213E0?OpenDocument&Highlight=s
     a1587nm.

(4) Install F. Atlee Dodge  wing lift strut assemblies following  F. Atlee
    Dodge Installation  Instructions No.  3233-I for  Modified Piper  Wing
    Lift Struts (STC SA4635NM), dated February 1, 1991, which can be found
    on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
    rgstc.nsf/0/E726AAA2831BD20085256CC2000E3DB7?OpenDocument&Highlight=sa
    4635nm.

    This installation may have  already been done in  accordance paragraph
    (i)(3)  of  this  AD.  Installing  these  wing  lift  strut assemblies
    terminates the repetitive inspection  requirements of this AD  for the
    wing lift strut fork only.  Repetitively inspect the wing lift  struts
    as specified in paragraph (h)(1)  or (h)(2) of this AD,  including all
    subparagraphs.

(m) INSTALL PLACARD

(1) For  all airplanes  previously affected  by AD  99-01-05 R1:  Within 1
    calendar month  after February  8, 1999  (the effective  date retained
    from  AD  99-01-05),  or  within 24  calendar  months  after  the last
    inspection required by AD 93-10-06  (which was superseded by AD  99-01
    -05),  whichever occurs  later, and  before further  flight after  any
    replacement of a wing lift strut assembly required by this AD, do  one
    of the following actions in paragraph (m)(1)(i) or (m)(1)(ii) of  this
    AD.  The  "NO  STEP"  markings  required  by  paragraph  (m)(1)(i)  or
    (m)(1)(ii)  of  this AD  must  remain in  place  for the  life  of the
    airplane.

(i) Install "NO STEP" decal, Piper (P/N) 80944-02, on each wing lift strut
    approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way
    that the letters can be  read when entering and exiting  the airplane;
    or

(ii) Paint the words "NO STEP"  approximately 6 inches from the bottom  of
     the  wing lift  strut in  a way  that the  letters can  be read  when
     entering and exiting  the airplane. Use  a minimum of  1-inch letters
     using a color that contrasts with the color of the airplane.

(2) For all airplanes new to this AD (not previously affected by AD  99-01
    -05 R1): Within 1 calendar month after the effective date of this  AD,
    or within 24 calendar months after the last inspection required by  AD
    93-10-06  (which  was  superseded by  AD  99-01-05),  whichever occurs
    later, and before further flight after any replacement of a wing  lift
    strut assembly required by this AD, do one of the following actions in
    paragraph (m)(2)(i) or (m)(2)(ii) of  this AD. The "NO STEP"  markings
    required by paragraph (m)(2)(i) or  (m)(2)(ii) of this AD must  remain
    in place for the life of the airplane.

(i) Install "NO STEP" decal, Piper (P/N) 80944-02, on each wing lift strut
    approximately 6 inches from the bottom of the wing lift strut in a way
    that the letters can be  read when entering and exiting  the airplane;
    or

(ii) Paint the words "NO STEP"  approximately 6 inches from the bottom  of
     the  wing lift  strut in  a way  that the  letters can  be read  when
     entering and exiting  the airplane. Use  a minimum of  1-inch letters
     using a color that contrasts with the color of the airplane

(n) ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE (AMOCS)

(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs  for
    this  AD  related  to Piper  Aircraft,  Inc.  airplanes; the  Manager,
    Seattle  ACO, FAA  has the  authority to  approve  AMOCs  for this  AD
    related to FS  2000 Corp, FS  2001 Corp, FS  2002 Corporation, and  FS
    2003 Corporation  airplanes; and  the Manager,  Standards Office, FAA,
    has  the authority  to approve  AMOCs for  this  AD  related to  LAVIA
    ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) airplanes, if requested using the  procedures
    found in  14 CFR  39.19. In  accordance with  14 CFR  39.19, send your
    request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
    Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager
    of  the  ACO, send  it  to the  attention  of the  appropriate  person
    identified in paragraph (o) of this AD.

(2) Before  using  any approved  AMOC, notify  your appropriate  principal
    inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the  local
    flight standards district office/certificate holding  district office.

(3) AMOCs approved  for AD 93-10-06,  Amendment 39-8586 (58  FR 29965, May
    25, 1993), AD 99-01-05, Amendment 39-10972 (63 FR 72132, December  31,
    1998), and AD 99-01-05 R1,  Amendment 39-17688 (78 FR 79599,  December
    31, 2013) are approved as AMOCs for this AD.

(o) RELATED INFORMATION

(1) For  more information  about this  AD related  to Piper Aircraft, Inc.
    airplanes, contact:  Gregory "Keith"  Noles, Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,
    Atlanta ACO, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone:
    (404) 474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.

(2) For more information  about this AD related  to FS 2000 Corp,  FS 2001
    Corp, FS 2002 Corporation, and FS 2003 Corporation airplanes, contact:
    Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer,  FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601  Lind Avenue
    SW., Renton, Washington 98057;  phone: (425) 917-6405; fax:  (245) 917
    -6590; email: jeff.morfitt@faa.gov.

(3) For  more information  about this  AD related  to LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A.
    (LAVIASA) airplanes, contact: S.M. Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
    Small  Airplane  Directorate,  901  Locust,  Room  301,  Kansas  City,
    Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4145; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
    sarjapur.nagarajan@faa.gov.

(4) For service information identified in this AD, contact Piper Aircraft,
    Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach, Florida  32960;
    telephone:  (772)  567-4361; Internet:  www.piper.com.  Copies of  the
    instructions  to the  F. Atlee  Dodge STC  and  information  about the
    Jensen Aircraft  STCs may  be obtained  from F.  Atlee Dodge, Aircraft
    Services, LLC., 6672 Wes Way, Anchorage, Alaska 99518-0409,  Internet:
    www.fadodge.com. You may view  this referenced service information  at
    the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
    64106. For  information on  the availability  of this  material at the
    FAA, call (816) 329-4148.

APPENDIX TO DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-1083

PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR  ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF PIPER  WING LIFT
STRUTS

EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS

1. A  portable ultrasonic thickness gauge  or flaw  detector with echo-to-
   echo digital thickness readout capable of reading  to 0.001-inch and an
   A-trace waveform display will be needed to do this inspection.

2. An ultrasonic probe with the following specifications will be needed to
   accomplish this inspection: 10 MHz (or higher), 0.283-inch (or smaller)
   diameter dual element or  delay line transducer designed  for thickness
   gauging.  The  transducer and  ultrasonic  system shall  be  capable of
   accurately measuring  the thickness  of AISI  4340 steel  down to 0.020
   -inch. An accuracy of +/-  0.002-inch throughout a 0.020-inch to  0.050
   -inch  thickness  range while  calibrating  shall be  the  criteria for
   acceptance.

3. Either a precision machined step  wedge made of 4340 steel (or  similar
   steel with equivalent sound velocity) or at least three shim samples of
   same  material  will  be  needed  to  accomplish  this  inspection. One
   thickness of  the step  wedge or  shim shall  be less  than or equal to
   0.020-inch, one shall  be greater than  or equal to  0.050-inch, and at
   least one other step or shim shall be between these two values.

4. Glycerin, light  oil, or similar  non-water based ultrasonic  couplants
   are recommended  in the  setup and  inspection procedures.  Water-based
   couplants,  containing   appropriate  corrosion   inhibitors,  may   be
   utilized, provided they are  removed from both the  reference standards
   and  the test  item after  the inspection  procedure is  completed  and
   adequate corrosion  prevention steps  are then  taken to  protect these
   items.

NOTE: Couplant is  defined as "a  substance used between  the face of  the
transducer and test surface  to improve transmission of  ultrasonic energy
across the transducer/strut interface."

NOTE: If surface roughness due to paint loss or corrosion is present,  the
surface should  be sanded  or polished  smooth before  testing to assure a
consistent and smooth surface for making contact with the transducer. Care
shall be taken  to remove a  minimal amount of  structural material. Paint
repairs may be necessary after the inspection to prevent further corrosion
damage from occurring. Removal of surface irregularities will  enhance the
accuracy of the inspection technique.

INSTRUMENT SETUP

1. Set up the ultrasonic equipment for thickness measurements as specified
   in the instrument's user's manual. Because of the variety of  equipment
   available   to   perform   ultrasonic   thickness   measurements,  some
   modification to this general setup procedure may be necessary. However,
   the tolerance requirement of step 13 and the record keeping requirement
   of step 14, must be satisfied.

2. If battery power  will be employed, check  to see that the  battery has
   been properly charged. The  testing will take approximately  two hours.
   Screen brightness  and contrast  should be  set to  match environmental
   conditions.

3. Verify  that the  instrument is  set for  the type  of transducer being
   used, i.e. single  or dual element,  and that the  frequency setting is
   compatible with the transducer.

4. If  a removable  delay line  is used,  remove it  and place  a drop  of
   couplant between the transducer face and the delay line to assure  good
   transmission of ultrasonic energy. Reassemble the delay line transducer
   and continue.

5. Program a velocity  of 0.231-inch/microsecond into the  ultrasonic unit
   unless an alternative instrument  calibration procedure is used  to set
   the sound velocity.

6. Obtain  a step  wedge  or steel  shims  per item  3  of  the  Equipment
   Requirements. Place the  probe on the  thickest sample using  couplant.
   Rotate the transducer slightly back and forth to "ring" the  transducer
   to the sample. Adjust  the delay and range  settings to arrive at  an A
   -trace signal display with the first backwall echo from the steel  near
   the left side of the screen and the second backwall echo near the right
   of the screen. Note that when a single element transducer is used,  the
   initial pulse  and the  delay line/steel  interface will  be off of the
   screen to the left. Adjust the gain to place the amplitude of the first
   backwall signal at approximately 80% screen height on the A-trace.

7. "Ring"  the transducer  on the  thinnest step  or shim  using couplant.
   Select positive half-wave  rectified, negative half-wave  rectified, or
   filtered signal display to obtain the cleanest signal. Adjust the pulse
   voltage, pulse width, and damping to obtain the best signal resolution.
   These settings  can vary  from one  transducer to  another and are also
   user dependent.

8. Enable the thickness gate, and adjust the gate so that it starts at the
   first backwall echo  and ends at  the second backwall  echo. (Measuring
   between the first and second backwall echoes will produce a measurement
   of the steel thickness that is  not affected by the paint layer  on the
   strut). If  instability of  the gate  trigger occurs,  adjust the gain,
   gate level, and/or damping to stabilize the thickness reading.

9. Check the  digital display reading  and if it  does not agree  with the
   known thickness  of the  thinnest thickness,  follow your  instrument's
   calibration recommendations to  produce the correct  thickness reading.
   When a  single element  transducer is  used this  will usually  involve
   adjusting the fine delay setting.

10. Place  the transducer  on the  thickest step  of shim  using couplant.
    Adjust the thickness gate width so  that the gate is triggered by  the
    second  backwall  reflection  of the  thick  section.  If the  digital
    display  does  not  agree with  the  thickest  thickness, follow  your
    instrument's  calibration  recommendations  to  produce  the   correct
    thickness  reading.  A  slight  adjustment  in  the  velocity  may  be
    necessary to get both the  thinnest and the thickest reading  correct.
    Document the changed velocity value.

11. Place couplant  on an area  of the lift  strut which is  thought to be
    free  of  corrosion  and  "ring"  the  transducer  to  surface.  Minor
    adjustments to the signal and gate settings may be required to account
    for  coupling  improvements  resulting  from  the  paint  layer.   The
    thickness gate level should  be set just high  enough so as not  to be
    triggered by irrelevant signal noise. An area on the upper surface  of
    the lift strut above the inspection  area would be a good location  to
    complete  this step  and should  produce a  thickness reading  between
    0.034-inch and 0.041-inch.

12. Repeat steps 8, 9, 10, and 11 until both thick and  thin shim measure-
    ments  are  within  tolerance  and  the  lift  strut  measurement   is
    reasonable and steady.

13. Verify that the thickness value shown in the digital display is within
    +/- 0.002-inch  of the  correct value  for each  of the  three or more
    steps of the setup wedge or shims. Make no further adjustments to  the
    instrument settings.

14. Record the  ultrasonic versus actual  thickness of all  wedge steps or
    steel shims available as a record of setup.

INSPECTION PROCEDURE

1. Clean the lower 18 inches of the wing lift struts using a cleaner  that
   will remove all dirt and grease. Dirt and grease will adversely  affect
   the accuracy of  the inspection technique.  Light sanding or  polishing
   may  also be  required to  reduce  surface  roughness as  noted in  the
   Equipment Requirements section.

2. Using a flexible  ruler, draw a \1/4\-inch  grid on the surface  of the
   first 11 inches from the lower end  of the strut as shown in Piper  MSB
   No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated  October
   10, 1989, as applicable. This can be done using a soft (#2) pencil  and
   should be done on both faces of the strut. As an alternative to drawing
   a complete grid, make two rows of marks spaced every \1/4\-inch  across
   the width of the strut. One row of marks should be about 11 inches from
   the lower end of the strut, and the second row should be several inches
   away where the strut starts  to narrow. Lay the flexible  ruler between
   respective tick marks of the two rows and use tape or a rubber band  to
   keep the ruler in place. See Figure 1.

3. Apply a generous amount of couplant inside each of the square areas  or
   along  the  edge  of  the  ruler.  Re-application  of  couplant  may be
   necessary.

4. Place the transducer inside the first square area of the drawn grid  or
   at the first \1/4\-inch mark on the ruler and "ring" the transducer  to
   the strut.  When using  a dual  element transducer,  be very careful to
   record the  thickness value  with the  axis of  the transducer elements
   perpendicular to any curvature in the strut. If this is not done,  loss
   of signal or inaccurate readings can result.

5. Take readings inside  each square  on the grid or  at \1/4\-inch incre-
   ments along the ruler and  record the results. When taking  a thickness
   reading, rotate the transducer  slightly back and forth  and experiment
   with  the angle  of contact  to produce  the lowest  thickness  reading
   possible. Pay close attention to the A-scan display to assure that  the
   thickness gate is triggering off of maximized backwall echoes.

NOTE: A reading shall  not exceed  .041 inch.  If a  reading  exceeds .041
-inch,  repeat steps  13 and  14 of  the Instrument  Setup section  before
proceeding further.

6. If the A-trace is unsteady  or the thickness reading is clearly  wrong,
   adjust the  signal gain  and/or gate  setting to  obtain reasonable and
   steady readings. If any instrument setting is adjusted, repeat steps 13
   and 14 of the Instrument Setup section before proceeding further.

7. In areas where obstructions are present, take a data point as close  to
   the correct area as possible.

NOTE: The strut wall contains  a fabrication bead at approximately  40% of
the strut chord. The bead may interfere with accurate measurements in that
specific location.

8. A measurement  of 0.024-inch or  less shall require  replacement of the
   strut prior to further flight.

9. If  at any  time during  testing an  area is  encountered where a valid
   thickness  measurement  cannot be  obtained  due to  a  loss of  signal
   strength or quality, the area shall be considered suspect. These  areas
   may have a remaining wall  thickness of less than 0.020-inch,  which is
   below  the  range  of this  setup,  or  they may  have  small  areas of
   localized corrosion or pitting present. The latter case will result  in
   a reduction in  signal strength due  to the sound  being scattered from
   the rough surface and may result in a signal that includes echoes  from
   the pits as well as the  backwall. The suspect area(s) shall be  tested
   with a Maule "Fabric Tester" as specified in Piper MSB No. 528D,  dated
   October 19, 1990, or Piper MSB No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989.

10. Record the lift strut inspection in the aircraft log book.

                    ILLUSTRATION (Figure 1)

Issued in  Kansas City,  Missouri, on  December 19,  2014. Earl  Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 17, 2015.
PREAMBLE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-1083; Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-036-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives;
Various Aircraft Equipped With Wing Lift Struts

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 99-01-05
R1, which applies to certain aircraft equipped with wing lift struts.
AD 99-01-05 R1 currently requires repetitively inspecting the wing lift
struts for corrosion; repetitively inspecting the wing lift strut forks
for cracks; replacing any corroded wing lift strut; replacing any
cracked wing lift strut fork; and repetitively replacing the wing lift
strut forks at a specified time for certain airplanes. Since we issued
AD 99-01-05 R1, we have determined that additional airplane models
should be added to the Applicability section. This proposed AD would
retain all requirements of the existing AD. We are proposing this AD to
correct the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 17, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Piper Aircraft, Inc., Customer Services, 2926 Piper Drive, Vero Beach,
Florida 32960; telephone: (772) 567-4361; Internet: www.piper.com.
Copies of the instructions to the F. Atlee Dodge supplemental type
certificate (STC) and information about the Jensen Aircraft STCs may be
obtained from F. Atlee Dodge, Aircraft Services, LLC., 6672 Wes Way,
Anchorage, Alaska 99518-0409, Internet: www.fadodge.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket


You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
1083; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For Piper Aircraft, Inc. airplanes, contact: Gregory "Keith"
Noles, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; phone: (404)
474-5551; fax: (404) 474-5606; email: gregory.noles@faa.gov.

For FS 2000 Corp, FS 2001 Corp, FS 2002 Corporation, and FS 2003
Corporation airplanes, contact: Jeff Morfitt, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057; phone:
(425) 917-6405; fax: (245) 917-6590; email: jeff.morfitt@faa.gov.

For LAVIA ARGENTINA S.A. (LAVIASA) airplanes, contact: S.M.
Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
4145; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: sarjapur.nagarajan@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited


We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2014-1083;
Directorate Identifier 2014-CE-036-AD" at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.

We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion


On November 22, 2013, we issued AD 99-01-05 R1, Amendment 39-17688
(78 FR 73997, December 10, 2013) and later issued on December 18, 2013
(78 FR 79599, December 31, 2013) as a correction, ("AD 99-01-05 R1"),
for certain aircraft equipped with wing lift struts. AD 99-01-05 R1
resulted from the need to clarify the intent that if a sealed wing lift
strut assembly is installed as a replacement part, the repetitive
inspection requirement is terminated only if the seal is never
improperly broken. If the seal is improperly broken, then that wing
lift strut becomes subject to continued repetitive inspections. We did
not intend to promote drilling holes into or otherwise unsealing a
sealed strut.

We issued AD 99-01-05 R1 to detect and correct corrosion and
cracking on the front and rear wing lift struts and forks, which could
cause the wing lift strut to fail. This failure could result in the
wing separating from the airplane.

Actions Since AD 99-01-05 R1 Was Issued


Since AD 99-01-05 R1 was issued, we have been informed that Piper
Aircraft, Inc. (Piper) Models J-3, J3C-65 (Army L-4A), J3P, J4B, and
J4F airplanes should be added to the Applicability section. We have
also been informed that there is a serial number overlap between Piper
Model PA-18s listed in AD 99-01-05 R1 and Piper Model PA-19 (Army L-
18C). Certain serial numbers listed for Model PA-18s should also be
listed under Model PA-19 (Army L-18C).

On December 22, 1998, we issued AD 99-01-05, Amendment 39-10972 (63
FR 72132, December 31, 1998), to supersede AD 93-10-06, Amendment 39-
8586 (58 FR 29965, May 25, 1993), which previously included Piper
Models J-3, J3P, J4B, and J4F airplanes in the Applicability section,
in order to clarify certain requirements of AD 93-10-06, eliminate the
lift strut fork repetitive inspection requirement for the Piper PA-25 series airplanes,
incorporate other airplane models omitted from the applicability, and
require installing a placard on the lift strut.

Relevant Service Information


We reviewed Piper Aircraft Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 528D, dated October 19, 1990, and Piper Aircraft Corporation
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 910A, dated October 10, 1989. The
service information describes procedures for wing lift strut assembly
inspection and replacement.

FAA's Determination


We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements


This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 99-01-05 R1.
This proposed AD would add airplanes to the Applicability section.

Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this AD affects 22,200 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD. However,
the only difference in the costs presented below and the costs
associated with AD 99-01-05 R1 is addition of 200 airplanes to the
applicability:

Estimated Costs

ACTION
LABOR COST
PARTS COST
COST PER PRODUCT
COST ON U.S. OPERATORS
Inspection of the wing lift struts and wing lift strut forks. 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $680 per inspection cycle. Not applicable $680 per inspection cycle. $15,096,000 per inspection cycle.
Installation placard 1 work-hour x $85 = $85. $30 $115 $2,553,000.

We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:

On-Condition Costs

ACTION
LABOR COST PER WING LIFT STRUT
PARTS COST PER WING LIFT STRUT
COST PER PRODUCT PER WING LIFT STRUT
Replacement of the wing lift strut and/or wing lift strutforks. 4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340.
$440
$780

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, "General
requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings


We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:

(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive
Order 12866,

(2) Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39


Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment


Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES


1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]


2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
99-01-05 R1, Amendment 39-17688 (78 FR 79599, December 31, 2013), and
adding the following new AD: