preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD THE BOEING COMPANY: Docket No. FAA-2010-0764; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-260-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by September 24, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This  AD  applies  to   The  Boeing  Company  Model  737-900ER  series
    airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert
    Service Bulletin 737-57A1308, Revision 1, dated October 1, 2009.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

UNSAFE CONDITION

(e) This AD results from reports of cracks emanating from  the  keyway  of
    the  fuel tank  access hole.  The Federal  Aviation Administration  is
    issuing  this AD  to detect  and  correct  such cracking,  which could
    result in the  loss of the  lower wing skin  load path and  consequent
    structural failure of the wing.

COMPLIANCE

(f) You are responsible  for  having  the  actions  required  by  this  AD
    performed within  the compliance  times specified,  unless the actions
    have already been done.

INSPECTION

(g) Before the accumulation of 7,500 total flight cycles,  or within 1,000
    flight cycles after  the effective date  of this AD,  whichever occurs
    later, do  a one-time  general visual  inspection for  a keyway in the
    fuel tank access door cutouts 531BB and 631BB, in accordance with  the
    Accomplishment  Instructions  of  Boeing  Alert  Service  Bulletin 737
    -57A1308, Revision 1, dated October 1, 2009 ("the service bulletin").

NOTE 1: For the  purposes of this AD,  a general visual inspection  is: "A
visual  examination  of an  interior  or exterior  area,  installation, or
assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of
inspection  is  made  from  within  touching  distance  unless   otherwise
specified.  A mirror  may be  necessary to  ensure visual  access  to  all
surfaces in the  inspection area. This  level of inspection  is made under
normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar  lighting,
flashlight, or  droplight and  may require  removal or  opening of  access
panels or  doors. Stands,  ladders, or  platforms may  be required to gain
proximity to the area being checked."

(1) If both access door cutouts do not have a keyway, no further action is
    required by this AD.

(2) If  any  access  door  has  a keyway, before the accumulation of 7,500
    total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective
    date of  this AD,  whichever occurs  later, do  a high  frequency eddy
    current (HFEC) inspection  for cracking of  the keyway, in  accordance
    with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.

(i) If no cracking is found during the  HFEC  inspection,  before  further
    flight, modify the profile of the keyway of the fuel tank access  door
    cutout,  in accordance  with the  Accomplishment Instructions  of  the
    service bulletin.

(ii) If any cracking is found and the  crack  is  0.030 inch  or  less  in
     length, before further flight  repair the keyway, in  accordance with
     the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.

(iii) If any cracking is found and the crack is greater than 0.030 inch in
      length,  before  further flight,  repair  the crack  using  a method
      approved in  accordance with  the procedures  specified in paragraph
      (h) of this AD

ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE (AMOCS)

(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,  has
       the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using  the
       procedures found in 14 CFR  39.19. Send information to ATTN:  Nancy
       Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA,  Seattle
       Aircraft  Certification  Office,  1601  Lind  Avenue  SW.,  Renton,
       Washington  98057-3356;  telephone (425)  917-6440;  fax (425)  917
       -6590.  Information  may  be  e-mailed  to:  9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC
       -Request@faa.gov.

(2) To request a different method of compliance or  a different compliance
    time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before  using
    any approved AMOC  on any airplane  to which the  AMOC applies, notify
    your  principal  maintenance  inspector  (PMI)  or  principal avionics
    inspector (PAI),  as appropriate,  or lacking  a principal  inspector,
    your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval  letter
    must specifically reference this AD.

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may  be  used  for
    any  repair  required by  this  AD if  it  is approved  by  the Boeing
    Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that
    has  been  authorized  by  the  Manager,  Seattle  ACO  to  make those
    findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the
    certification  basis   of  the   airplane,  and   the  approval   must
    specifically refer to this AD.

Issued in  Renton, Washington,  on July  30, 2010.  Ali Bahrami,  Manager,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 24, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0764; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-260-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; The Boeing Company Model 737-900ER
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  We  propose to  adopt  a new  airworthiness  directive (AD)  for
certain Model 737-900ER series  airplanes. This proposed AD  would require
doing a one-time general visual inspection  for a keyway in two fuel  tank
access door cutouts, and  related investigative and corrective  actions if
necessary. This proposed AD results from reports of cracks emanating  from
the keyway  of the  fuel tank  access hole.  We are  proposing this  AD to
detect and correct such  cracking, which could result  in the loss of  the
lower wing skin load path and consequent structural failure of the wing.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

For service  information identified  in this  proposed AD,  contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes,  Attention: Data  & Services  Management, P.  O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65,  Seattle,  Washington 98124-2207;  telephone 206-544-5000,
extension  1;  fax  206-766-5680;  e-mail  me.boecom@boeing.com;  Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.  You may  review copies  of the  referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601  Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton,  Washington. For information  on the availability  of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov;  or  in  person  at  the  Docket  Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket  contains this proposed  AD, the regulatory  evaluation, any
comments  received,  and other  information.  The street  address  for the
Docket  Office  (telephone  800-647-5527)  is  in  the  ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Marsh, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM-120S,  FAA, Seattle  Aircraft Certification  Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6440;  fax
(425) 917-6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed  under  the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2010-0764;   Directorate
Identifier  2009-NM-260-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

We have received  reports of cracks,  ranging from 0.02  to 0.380 inch  in
length emanating from the keyway of the fuel tank access hole on the  wing
lower skin between  wing rib numbers  8 and 9  on Model 777-200LR  and 777
-300ER series airplanes. The fuel tank access door at this location has  a
fuel measuring stick installed, and the keyway is used to ensure that  the
fuel measuring stick is oriented correctly when the fuel tank access  door
is installed. The crack is believed to be the result of fatigue due to the
position of  the keyway.  The lower  wing skins  on Model 737-900ER series
airplanes have fuel tank access holes with the same configuration as  that
of  the  affected  fuel  tank  access  holes  on  Model  777-300ER  series
airplanes. The  affected fuel  tank access  holes on  the Model  737-900ER
series airplanes are located between  ribs 4 and 5, between  wing stations
180 and  204.25. These  fuel tank  access holes  are for  fuel tank access
doors 531BB and 631BB. Although cracks  have not yet been reported on  any
Model  737-900ER  series   airplanes,  damage  tolerance   analysis  shows
potential for Model 737-900ER series  airplanes lower wing skins to  crack
at the noted locations. This condition, if not corrected, could result  in
the  loss of  the lower  wing skin  load path  and  consequent  structural
failure of the wing.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed  Boeing Alert Service  Bulletin 737-57A1308, Revision  1,
dated October  1, 2009.  The service  bulletin describes  procedures for a
general visual inspection for a keyway in the fuel tank access door cutout
on the  left and  right wings,  and related  investigative and  corrective
actions if necessary. The related investigative action is a high frequency
eddy current inspection for cracking of the keyway. The corrective actions
include changing the profile of the  keyway for the fuel tank access  door
cutout, repairing any  cracking of the  keyway of the  access door cutout,
and  contacting  Boeing  for certain  repair  instructions  and doing  the
repair.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD

We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same type design. This proposed AD  would
require accomplishing  the actions  specified in  the service  information
described previously,  except as  discussed under  "Difference Between the
Proposed AD and Service Bulletin."

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED AD AND SERVICE BULLETIN

Boeing Alert Service  Bulletin 737-57A1308, Revision  1, dated October  1,
2009, specifies  to contact  the manufacturer  for instructions  on how to
repair certain conditions,  but this proposed  AD would require  repairing
those conditions in one of the following ways:

Using a method that we approve; or

Using data  that meet  the certification  basis of  the airplane, and that
have  been  approved  by  the  Boeing  Commercial  Airplanes  Organization
Designation Authorization  (ODA), whom  we have  authorized to  make those
findings.

OTHER RELEVANT RULEMAKING

The lower  wing skins  on Model  777-200LR and  777-300ER series airplanes
have fuel tank access  holes with the same  configuration as those of  the
affected  fuel  tank  access  holes  on  the  Model  737-900ER  airplanes.
Therefore, Model 777-200LR and  777-300ER series airplanes may  be subject
to the identified unsafe condition. We are considering similar  rulemaking
related to the identified unsafe condition for certain Model 777-200LR and
777-300ER series airplanes.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate that  this proposed  AD would  affect 30  airplanes  of  U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take 3 work-hours per product  to
comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of this proposed AD  to the
U.S. operators to be $7,650, or $255 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: "Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking  under the authority described in  Subtitle
VII, Part  A, Subpart  III, Section  44701: "General  requirements." Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is  likely  to exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866,

2. Is not  a "significant  rule" under  the  DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the  Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

You  can  find  our  regulatory  evaluation  and  the  estimated  costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC.  39.13  [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: