preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD CENTRAIR: Docket No. FAA-2010-0735; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-030-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by September 7, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to CENTRAIR Models 101, 101A, 101P, and 101AP gliders,
    all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight Controls.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

Damages to  the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  of a non- reinforced
version have been  reported to Societe  Nouvelle (SN) Centrair.  This tube
had been reinforced in 1984  with a modification. Gliders produced  before
the  introduction  of  this  modification  have  not  been  systematically
retrofitted.

In case  of rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  breaking in  flight when
adjusting the rudder pedals position,  it might interfere with the  rudder
pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted rudder movement  and
consequently, to reduced control of the sailplane.

For the reason described above, this AD requires inspecting the rudder bar
locking adjustment tube and, if necessary, replacing it.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already  done, do  the  following  actions in  accordance  with
    Societe Nouvelle Centrair Service Bulletin No. 101-29, dated July  30,
    2009:

(1) Within the next 30 days  after the effective date of this  AD, inspect
    the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  to determine  if it has been
    reinforced and to determine if it has been damaged.

(2) If the results of the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of  this
    AD  show that  the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  has not  been
    reinforced and is not damaged, replace it with a reinforced rudder bar
    locking  adjustment  tube,  part  number  (P/N)  $Y186A,  at  the next
    scheduled maintenance event after the effective date of this AD but no
    later than 12 months after the effective date of this AD.

(3) If the results of the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of  this
    AD  show that  the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  has not  been
    reinforced but  is damaged,  replace it  with a  reinforced rudder bar
    locking adjustment tube, P/N $Y186A, before further flight.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows:
No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Off-
    ice, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
    using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to  ATTN:
    Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
    Locust, Room 301,  Kansas City, Missouri  64106; telephone: (816)  329
    -4130; fax:  (816) 329-4090.  Before using  any approved  AMOC on  any
    glider to which  the AMOC applies,  notify your appropriate  principal
    inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),  or
    lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement  in this  AD,
    under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2010-0099,
    dated May 26, 2010; and Societe Nouvelle Centrair Service Bulletin No.
    101-29, dated July 30, 2009, for related information.

Issued in  Kansas City,  Missouri, on  July 16,  2010. Kim Smith, Manager,
Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 7, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2010-0735;  Directorate  Identifier  2010-CE-030-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; CENTRAIR  Models  101,  101A,  101P,  and  101AP
Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of  Transportat-
ion (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Damages to  the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  of a  non-reinforced
version have been  reported to Societe  Nouvelle (SN) Centrair.  This tube
had been reinforced in 1984  with a modification. Gliders produced  before
the  introduction  of  this  modification  have  not  been  systematically
retrofitted.

In case  of rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  breaking in  flight when
adjusting the rudder pedals position,  it might interfere with the  rudder
pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted rudder movement  and
consequently, to reduced control of the sailplane.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 7, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov;  or  in  person  at  the  Docket  Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket  contains this proposed  AD, the regulatory  evaluation, any
comments  received,  and other  information.  The street  address  for the
Docket  Office (telephone  (800) 647-5527)  is in  the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg  Davison,  Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate,  901 Locust, Room  301, Kansas City,  Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4130; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed  under  the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2010-0735;   Directorate
Identifier  2010-CE-030-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The European Aviation Safety Agency  (EASA), which is the Technical  Agent
for the Member States  of the European Community,  has issued AD No.  2010
-0099, dated  May 26,  2010, (referred  to after  this as  "the MCAI"), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

Damages to  the rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  of a  non-reinforced
version have been  reported to Societe  Nouvelle (SN) Centrair.  This tube
had been reinforced in 1984  with a modification. Gliders produced  before
the  introduction  of  this  modification  have  not  been  systematically
retrofitted.

In case  of rudder  bar locking  adjustment tube  breaking in  flight when
adjusting the rudder pedals position,  it might interfere with the  rudder
pedals which could lead to rudder jam or a restricted rudder movement  and
consequently, to reduced control of the sailplane.

For the reason described above, this AD requires inspecting the rudder bar
locking adjustment tube and, if necessary, replacing it.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Societe Nouvelle Centrair  has issued Service  Bulletin No. 101-29,  dated
July  30, 2009.  The actions  described in  this  service  information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral  agreement with  this State  of Design  Authority, they have
notified us  of the  unsafe condition  described in  the MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all information and  determined the unsafe condition  exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a Note within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate  that  this  proposed AD  will  affect  52  products of  U.S.
registry.  We also  estimate that  it would  take  about  1 work-hour  per
product to  comply with  the basic  requirements of  this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.

Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD  on U.S.
operators to be $4,420 or $85 per product.

In addition, we estimate that  any necessary follow-on actions would  take
about 1 work-hour and  require parts costing $51,  for a cost of  $136 per
product. We have  no way of  determining the number  of products that  may
need these actions.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition  that  is likely  to exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and  responsib-
ilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the  DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: