preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY: Docket No. FAA-2010-0711; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-25-AD.
APPLICABILITY: Model R22, R22  Alpha, R22  Beta, and R22 Mariner  helicop-
ters, serial numbers  (S/N) 0002 through  3325, that have  more than 2,200
hours total time-in-service (TIS); and  Model R44 and R44 II  helicopters,
S/N  0001  through  1200,  that have  more  than  2,200  hours total  TIS,
certificated in any category.

COMPLIANCE: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To  prevent  the tail  rotor  (T/R) control  pedal  bearing block  support
(support) from breaking, which can bind the T/R control pedals,  resulting
in  a reduction  of yaw  control and  subsequent  loss  of control  of the
helicopter, accomplish the following:

(a) Within 100 hours TIS,  visually inspect each A359-1 (left)  and A359-2
    (right)  pedal support  for a  crack  by  referring to  the figure  in
    Robinson Helicopter Company  (Robinson) Service Bulletin  SB-97, dated
    February 22, 2008 (SB-97) for all Model R22 helicopters, and  Robinson
    Service Bulletin SB-63, dated February 22, 2008 (SB-63) for all  Model
    R44 helicopters.

(1) If you find a crack  in a support, before further flight,  replace the
    cracked support with an airworthy support that is at least  0.050-inch
    thick.

(2) For each uncracked support,  measure the thickness of the  support. If
    the  support is  less than  0.050-inch thick,  before further  flight,
    install a safety tab on the  support in accordance with steps 4  and 5
    of the Compliance Procedures section in SB-97 or SB-63, as appropriate
    for your model helicopter.

(b) At the next 2,200 hours TIS overhaul, replace any support that is less
    than 0.050-inch  thick, with  an airworthy  support that  is at  least
    0.050-inch thick.

(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different  compliance
    time for this AD, follow the  procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Contact  the
    Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, ATTN: Eric D.
    Schrieber, Aviation Safety  Engineer, 3960 Paramount  Blvd., Lakewood,
    California  90712,  telephone  (562)  627-5348,  fax  (562)   627-5210
    (regarding  Model  R22  helicopters); or  ATTN: Fred  Guerin, Aviation
    Safety  Engineer,  telephone   (562)  627-5232,  fax   (562)  627-5210
    (regarding  Model R44  helicopters) for  information about  previously
    approved alternative methods of compliance.

Issued in Fort Worth,  Texas, on July 6,  2010. Mark R. Schilling,  Acting
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0711; Directorate Identifier 2008-SW-25-AD] RIN  2120
-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Robinson  Helicopter  Company  (Robinson)  Model
R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner Helicopters, and Model R44,  and
R44 II Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This  document proposes  adopting a  new airworthiness  directive
(AD)  for  Robinson  Model  R22, R22  Alpha,  R22  Beta,  and R22  Mariner
helicopters, and Model  R44 and R44  II helicopters. The  AD would require
visually  inspecting each  tail rotor  (T/R) control  pedal bearing  block
support (support) for a crack,  measuring the thickness of each  uncracked
support, installing support safety tabs on certain supports, and replacing
supports of a certain thickness during overhaul. This proposal is prompted
by  two  reports of  Model  R22 helicopters  experiencing  broken supports
during flight, which resulted in  the T/R control pedals becoming  jammed.
The  actions specified  by the  proposed AD  are intended  to prevent  the
supports from breaking, which can  bind the T/R control pedals,  resulting
in  a reduction  of yaw  control and  subsequent loss  of  control  of the
helicopter.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the  following addresses to submit comments  on this
proposed AD:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

You may get  the service information  identified in this  proposed AD from
Robinson  Helicopter  Company, 2901  Airport  Drive, Torrance,  California
90505, telephone (310) 539-0508, fax (310) 539-5198.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric D. Schrieber, Aviation Safety Engin-
eer,  telephone (562)  627-5348, fax  (562) 627-5210,  regarding  Robinson
Model R22 helicopters, or Fred Guerin, Aviation Safety Engineer, telephone
(562)  627-5232,  fax  (562)   627-5210,  regarding  Robinson  Model   R44
helicopters,  at  the  FAA,  Los  Angeles  Aircraft  Certification Office,
Airframe Branch, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you  to submit any  written data, views,  or arguments regarding
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  the address  listed under  the
caption ADDRESSES. Include  the docket number  "FAA-2010-0711, Directorate
Identifier  2008-SW-25-AD"   at  the   beginning  of   your  comments.  We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by  the closing date  and may amend  the proposed AD  in
light of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also post a report  summarizing each substantive verbal contact  with
FAA  personnel  concerning  this  proposed  rulemaking.  Using  the search
function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any
of our dockets, including  the name of the  individual who sent or  signed
the comment. You  may review the  DOT's complete Privacy  Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).

EXAMINING THE DOCKET

You may examine  the docket that  contains the proposed  AD, any comments,
and other information in person at the Docket Operations office between  9
a.m.  and 5  p.m., Monday  through Friday,  except  Federal  holidays. The
Docket Operations  office (telephone  (800) 647-5527)  is located  in Room
W12-140 on the  ground floor of  the West Building  at the street  address
stated in  the ADDRESSES  section. Comments  will be  available in  the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

DISCUSSION

This  document proposes  adopting a  new AD  for Robinson  Model R22,  R22
Alpha, R22 Beta,  and R22 Mariner  helicopters, serial numbers  (S/N) 0002
through  3325, that  have  more  than 2,200  hours  total  time-in-service
(TIS); and Model R44 and R44  II helicopters, S/N 0001 through 1200,  that
have more than  2,200 hours total  TIS. The AD  would require, within  100
hours TIS, visually inspecting both A359-1 and A359-2 supports for a crack
and replacing any cracked or broken support before further flight, and  if
not cracked,  measuring the  thickness of  both supports  and if less than
0.050-inch thick, installing  support safety tabs,  and at the  next 2,200
hour TIS  overhaul, replacing  any support  that is  less than  0.050-inch
thick with a support that is  at least 0.050-inch thick. This proposal  is
prompted by  two reports  of Model  R22 helicopters  with more  than 7,000
hours  TIS,  with  supports  made  from  0.040-inch  thick  sheet   metal,
experiencing broken supports during flight,  which led to the T/R  control
pedals  becoming jammed,  resulting in  hard  landings  and damage  to the
helicopters. The  actions specified  by the  proposed AD  are intended  to
prevent the supports from breaking, which can bind the T/R control pedals,
resulting in a reduction of yaw control and subsequent loss of control  of
the helicopter.

We have reviewed  Robinson Helicopter Company  Service Bulletin SB-63  and
SB-97,  both  dated  February  22,  2008,  which  describe  procedures for
inspecting both supports for a crack, and if no crack is found,  measuring
each support  and installing  safety tabs  on supports  that are less than
0.050-inch thick, and at the next 2,200 hour TIS  overhaul, replacing cer-
tain supports.

This unsafe condition is likely  to exist or develop on  other helicopters
of the same type design. The actions would be required to be  accomplished
by  following  specified  portions  of  the  service  bulletins  described
previously.

This proposed  AD would  affect 4,524  helicopters of  U.S. registry,  and
proposed actions  would take  approximately 0.5  work hour  to inspect and
measure the supports. We estimate that 2,050 helicopters would require  an
additional  1 work  hour to  install both  safety  tabs;  6 work  hours to
replace both supports if cracked or  broken or before overhaul, or 3  work
hours to replace both supports as  part of a 2,200 hours TIS  overhaul, at
an average  labor rate  of $85  per work  hour. Required  parts would cost
approximately $20 per support if  replacement is required. Based on  these
figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators  would
be $1,101,830, assuming 1,538 (approximately 75% of the 2,050 helicopters)
have  both  supports  replaced   during  overhaul,  and  512   helicopters
(approximately 25% of the  2,050 helicopters) have both  supports replaced
before the next 2,200 hours TIS overhaul.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We  have  determined  that  this proposed  AD  would  not  have federalism
implications under Executive Order  13132. Additionally, this proposed  AD
would  not  have  a  substantial  direct  effect  on  the  States,  on the
relationship between  the national  Government and  the States,  or on the
distribution of  power and  responsibilities among  the various  levels of
government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a draft economic  evaluation of the estimated costs  to comply
with this proposed  AD. See the  AD docket to  examine the draft  economic
evaluation.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA  Administrator. Subtitle VII,  Aviation Programs, describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking  under the authority described in  Subtitle
VII, Part  A, Subpart  III, section  44701, "General  requirements." Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or devel-
op on products identified in this rulemaking action.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly,  pursuant   to  the   authority  delegated   to  me   by  the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend  part
39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. Section  39.13 is  amended by  adding a  new airworthiness directive to
   read as follows: