preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD.: Docket No. FAA-2010-0250; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-011-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by April 29, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to Model PC-7 airplanes, all serial numbers, certific-
    ated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53: Fuselage.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is prompted  due to  the discovery  of
corrosion at  the bonding  strap connections  on the  left and right lower
longerons between fuselage frames 1  and 1A. The possibility of  corrosion
is  increased because  of the  high  electrical  current flow  between the
tinned copper terminal lug of the bonding strap and the aluminum longeron.

Such a condition, if left uncorrected, could lead to  failure of the long-
eron and will prejudice the structural integrity of the aircraft.

In order to correct and control the situation, this AD requires a one time
inspection of the longeron structure and the terminal lugs of the  bonding
straps for signs of corrosion.

For left  and right  lower longerons  where corrosion  is found during the
inspection, the MCAI also requires repair of any longeron where  corrosion
is found.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) Within the next 120 days after the effective date of this AD,  perform
    a visual  inspection of  the forward  bonding points  and the terminal
    lugs on the left and  right lower longerons between fuselage  frames 1
    and 1A for signs of corrosion. Do the inspection following  paragraphs
    3.C.(1), (2),  and (3)  of PILATUS  PC-7 Service  Bulletin No. 53-007,
    dated January 5, 2010.

(2) If during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD,  any
    signs  of  corrosion  are  found,  prior  to  further  flight, perform
    corrective actions in accordance with the Accomplishment  Instructions
    in paragraph 3.D of PILATUS PC-7 SB No. 53-007, dated January 5, 2010.
    If the corrosion damage is out of limits, record the values and  apply
    to PILATUS  for a  repair scheme  at: PILATUS  AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer
    Service Manager, CH-6371 STANS, Switzerland; telephone: +41 (0) 41 619
    62 08; fax: +41 (0) 41 619 73 11.

NOTE 1: The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the  airwor-
thiness authority for Switzerland, will work with PILATUS in reviewing the
results  of the  initial  inspection  required by  this AD.  From this,  a
repetitive inspection requirement or other action may be established.  The
FAA will evaluate any such action and determine whether further rulemaking
is necessary.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or  service information as foll-
ows: No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Off-
    ice, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
    using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to  ATTN:
    Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
    Locust, Room 301,  Kansas City, Missouri  64106; telephone: (816)  329
    -4059; fax:  (816) 329-4090.  Before using  any approved  AMOC on  any
    airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate  principal
    inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),  or
    lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement  in this AD, un-
    der the provisions of the  Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.  3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer to  MCAI  FOCA  AD HB-2010-001,  dated  February  12, 2010;  and
    PILATUS PC-7 Service Bulletin No.  53-007, dated January 5, 2010,  for
    related information.

Issued in  Kansas City,  Missouri, on  March 4,  2010. Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting  Manager,  Small   Airplane  Directorate,  Aircraft   Certification
Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 29, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2010-0250;  Directorate  Identifier  2010-CE-011-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-7 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of  Transportat-
ion (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is prompted  due to  the discovery  of
corrosion at  the bonding  strap connections  on the  left and right lower
longerons between fuselage frames 1  and 1A. The possibility of  corrosion
is  increased because  of the  high  electrical  current flow  between the
tinned copper terminal lug of the bonding strap and the aluminum longeron.

Such  a condition,  if left  uncorrected, could  lead to  failure  of  the
longeron and will prejudice the structural integrity of the aircraft.

The proposed  AD would  require actions  that are  intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You may examine the AD docket on  the Internet at  http://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the  Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m.  and 5
p.m.,  Monday  through  Friday, except  Federal  holidays.  The AD  docket
contains  this  proposed  AD,  the  regulatory  evaluation,  any  comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket  Office
(telephone (800) 647-5527) is in  the ADDRESSES section. Comments will  be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug  Rudolph,  Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate,  901 Locust, Room  301, Kansas City,  Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed under   the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2010-0250;   Directorate
Identifier  2010-CE-011-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The  Federal  Office  of  Civil Aviation  (FOCA),  which  is  the aviation
authority for Switzerland, has issued FOCA AD HB-2010-001, dated  February
12, 2010  (referred to  after this  as "the  MCAI"), to  correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is prompted  due to  the discovery  of
corrosion at  the bonding  strap connections  on the  left and right lower
longerons between fuselage frames 1  and 1A. The possibility of  corrosion
is  increased because  of the  high  electrical  current flow  between the
tinned copper terminal lug of the bonding strap and the aluminum longeron.

Such  a condition,  if left  uncorrected, could  lead to  failure  of  the
longeron and will prejudice the  structural integrity of  the aircraft. In
order to correct and  control the situation, this  AD requires a one  time
inspection of the longeron structure and the terminal lugs of the  bonding
straps for signs of corrosion.

For left  and right  lower longerons  where corrosion  is found during the
inspection, the MCAI also requires repair of any longeron where  corrosion
is found. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in  the
AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. has issued PILATUS PC-7 Service Bulletin No. 53-007,
dated January 5, 2010. The  actions described in this service  information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral  agreement with  this State  of Design  Authority, they have
notified us  of the  unsafe condition  described in  the MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all information and  determined the unsafe condition  exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate  that  this  proposed AD  will  affect  10  products of  U.S.
registry. We  also estimate  that it  would take  about 4.5 work-hours per
product to  comply with  the basic  requirements of  this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.

Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD  on U.S.
operators to be $3,825, or $383 per product.

In addition, we estimate that  any necessary follow-on actions would  take
about 3 work-hours and require parts costing $500, for a cost of $755  per
product. We have  no way of  determining the number  of products that  may
need these actions.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the  FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition  that  is likely  to exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and  responsib-
ilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the  DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: