preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGIES OF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD: Docket No. FAA-2010-0235; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-010-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by April 23, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) This AD supersedes 97-11-12, Amendment 39-10041.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to Models  N22B, N22S, and N24A airplanes, all  serial
    numbers, certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

    The  results  of  full  scale fatigue  tests  being  conducted  by the
    manufacturer have shown the  need for inspection of  critical fastener
    holes in  the stub  wing upper  front spar  cap, near  the wing  strut
    attachment.

    Amendment 1 adopts the manufacturer's latest service bulletin. Its new
    inspection  method avoids  having  to  remove the  Huck bolts  and the
    potential to damage the holes.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions in accordance with Nomad
    Service Bulletin NMD-53-22, dated April 17, 2007:

(1) Within the  next 100 hours  time-in-service (TIS) after  the effective
    date of this AD or within the next 90 days after the effective date of
    this AD,  whichever occurs  first, install  an inspection  hole in the
    left-hand and right-hand stub wing bottom skin.

(2) Before further flight  after installing the inspection  holes required
    in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, initially inspect the stub wing  front
    spar cap for cracks.  Repetitively inspect thereafter every  600 hours
    TIS.

(3) If  any crack  is found  during any  inspection required  in paragraph
    (f)(2)  of this  AD, before  further flight  contact Customer  Support
    Manager,  Gippsland  Aeronautics  Pty  Ltd.,  P.O.  Box  881, MORWELL,
    Victoria, 3040,  Australia; phone:  +61 3  5172 1200;  fax: +61 3 5172
    1201;  e-mail:  support@gippsaero.com,  for  an  FAA-approved   repair
    scheme/modification  and incorporate  the repair  scheme/modification.
    Due to  FAA policy,  the repair  scheme/modification for  crack damage
    must  include an  immediate repair  of the  crack.  The  repair scheme
    cannot    be    by   repetitive    inspection    only.   The    repair
    scheme/modification may incorporate repetitive inspections in addition
    to the repetitive inspections required in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.
    Continued  operational  flight  with un-repaired  crack damage  is not
    permitted.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows:
The MCAI states to follow the service bulletin. The service bulletin  does
not specifically call out a corrective action if cracks are found. The FAA
is including specific instruction of corrective action in the AD.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods  of Compliance  (AMOCs):  The  Manager,  Standards
    Office,  FAA, has  the authority  to approve  AMOCs  for  this AD,  if
    requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information
    to  ATTN:  Doug  Rudolph,  Aerospace  Engineer,  FAA,  Small  Airplane
    Directorate,  901  Locust,  Room  301,  Kansas  City,  Missouri 64106;
    telephone:  (816)  329-4059;  fax: (816)  329-4090.  Before  using any
    approved AMOC on any airplane  to which the AMOC applies,  notify your
    appropriate  principal  inspector  (PI) in  the  FAA  Flight Standards
    District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements:  For any  reporting requirement  in  this  AD,
    under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer to MCAI  Civil  Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) AD  GAF-N22-52,
    Amendment 1, dated January 2010; and Nomad Service Bulletin NMD-53-22,
    dated April 17, 2007, for related information.

Issued in  Kansas City,  Missouri,  on  March 2, 2010. Sandra J. Campbell,
Acting  Manager,  Small   Airplane  Directorate,  Aircraft   Certification
Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 23, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0235; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-010-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; AeroSpace Technologies of Australia Pty
Ltd Models N22B, N22S, and N24A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above that would  supersede an existing AD. This  proposed
AD  results  from mandatory  continuing  airworthiness information  (MCAI)
originated by  an aviation  authority of  another country  to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the
unsafe  condition  as:  The  results of  full  scale  fatigue  tests being
conducted  by  the manufacturer  have  shown the  need  for inspection  of
critical fastener holes in  the stub wing upper  front spar cap, near  the
wing strut  attachment. The  proposed AD  would require  actions that  are
intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov;  or  in  person  at  the  Docket  Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket  contains this proposed  AD, the regulatory  evaluation, any
comments  received,  and other  information.  The street  address  for the
Docket  Office (telephone  (800) 647-5527)  is in  the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER  INFORMATION CONTACT:  Doug Rudolph,  Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate,  901 Locust, Room  301, Kansas City,  Missouri
64106;   telephone:   (816)  329-4059;   fax:   (816)  329-4090;   e-mail:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed  under  the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2010-0235;   Directorate
Identifier  2010-CE-010-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
regulations.gov, including any personal  information you provide. We  will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we  receive
about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

On July 11, 1997, we issued AD 97-11-12, Amendment 39-10041 (62 FR  28997,
May 29,  1997). That  AD required  actions intended  to address  an unsafe
condition on the products listed above.

Since we  issued AD  97-11-12, the  manufacturer has  revised the  service
information to simplify the visual inspection method.

The  Civil  Aviation  Safety  Authority  (CASA),  which  is  the  aviation
authority  for Australia,  has issued  AD GAF-N22-52,  Amendment 1,  dated
January 2010 (referred to after this as "the MCAI"), to correct an  unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

The  results  of  full  scale   fatigue  tests  being  conducted  by   the
manufacturer have shown the need for inspection of critical fastener holes
in the stub wing upper front spar cap, near the wing strut attachment.

Amendment 1  adopts the  manufacturer's latest  service bulletin.  Its new
inspection method avoids having to remove the Huck bolts and the potential
to damage the holes.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

AeroSpace  Technologies  of  Australia Limited  has  issued  Nomad Service
Bulletin NMD-53-22, dated  April 17, 2007.  The actions described  in this
service  information  are  intended   to  correct  the  unsafe   condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral  agreement with  this State  of Design  Authority, they have
notified us  of the  unsafe condition  described in  the MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all information and  determined the unsafe condition  exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate  that  this  proposed AD  will  affect  25  products of  U.S.
registry.  We also  estimate that  it would  take about  2 work-hours  per
product to  comply with  the basic  requirements of  this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.

Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD  on U.S.
operators to be $4,250, or $170 per product.

In addition, we estimate that  any necessary follow-on actions would  take
about 4 work-hours and require parts costing $2,500, for a cost of  $2,840
per product. We have no way of determining the number of products that may
need these actions.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is likely  to  exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not  a "significant  rule"  under  the DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the  Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC.  39.13  [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-10041 (62 FR 28997,
May 29, 1997), and adding the following new AD: