preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD BOMBARDIER, INC: Docket No. FAA-2010-0223; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-105-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by April 29, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to the Bombardier, Inc. airplanes  identified in para-
    graphs (c)(1),  (c)(2), and  (c)(3) of  this AD,  certificated in  any
    category.

(1) Model CL-600-2B19  (Regional Jet Series  100 & 440)  airplanes, serial
    numbers 7003 through 8089 inclusive;

(2) Model  CL-600-2C10 (Regional  Jet Series  700, 701  & 702)  airplanes,
    serial numbers 10003 through 10265 inclusive; and

(3) Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) and CL-600-2D24  (Regional
    Jet Series 900) airplanes, serial numbers  15001 through 15173 inclus-
    ive.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52: Doors.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

Several cases of  corrosion in lower  structural members of  the passenger
door have been  reported. It was  subsequently determined that  a drainage
ramp (constructed from resin) had deteriorated with time and was retaining
moisture. The ramp, therefore,  requires removal, both to  prevent further
corrosion and  to allow  full access  to the  door structure during future
scheduled inspections. Corrosion  left undetected could  eventually affect
the structural integrity of the door and surrounding structure.

The required actions include a general visual inspection for corrosion and
damage of the lower  inner section of the  door, repair if necessary,  and
application of corrosion inhibitor compound.

COMPLIANCE

(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD perfor-
    med within  the compliance  times specified,  unless the  actions have
    already been done.

ACTIONS

(g) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours, or within  5,000
    flight hours  after the  effective date  of this  AD, whichever occurs
    later,  do the  actions specified  in paragraphs  (g)(1), (g)(2),  and
    (g)(3) of this AD.

(1) Remove the lower passenger  door ramp, in accordance  with the applic-
    able Bombardier modification summary  package specified in Table  1 of
    this AD.

(2) Do a general visual inspection for any damage and corrosion behind the
    drainage  ramp in  the lower  portion of  the passenger  door. If  any
    damage  or  corrosion  is  found,  before  further  flight  repair  in
    accordance with a  method approved by  the Manager, New  York Aircraft
    Certification Office, FAA; or  Transport Canada Civil Aviation  (TCCA)
    (or its delegated agent).

(3) Remove  the lower  passenger door  ramp and  apply corrosion inhibitor
    compound, in  accordance with  the applicable  Bombardier modification
    summary package specified  in Table 1  of this AD.  Applying corrosion
    inhibitor compound  is a  terminating action  for the  requirements of
    this AD.

                          TABLE 1--SERVICE INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    APPLICABLE           BOMBARDIER
    AIRPLANES        SERVICE INFORMATION       REVISION       DATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Model CL-600-2B19
airplanes.......    Bombardier Modification    A1......  April 24, 2009.
                    Summary Package
                    IS601R52110030.
Model CL-600-2C10,
CL-600-2D15,
and CL-600-2D24     Bombardier Modification    A1......  April 24, 2009.
airplanes.          Summary Package
                    IS67052110074.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4) Inspections and modifications  accomplished before the effective  date
    of  this  AD  according  to  Bombardier  Modification  Summary Package
    IS601R52110030,  Revision A,  dated  July  5, 2006;  or IS67052110074,
    Revision  A,  dated  July  5,  2006;  as  applicable;  are  considered
    acceptable  for  compliance  with  the  corresponding  inspection   or
    modification specified in this AD.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 1: This  AD differs  from  the  MCAI and/or  service  information  as
follows:

The MCAI  does not  require an  inspection or  application of  a corrosion
inhibitor compound. This AD requires both actions.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The  Manager, New York Air-
    craft Certification Office (ACO),  ANE-170, FAA, has the  authority to
    approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found  in
    14 CFR 39.19.  Send information to  ATTN: Program Manager,  Continuing
    Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
    Westbury, New York,  11590; telephone 516-228-7300;  fax 516-794-5531.
    Before  using any  approved AMOC  on any  airplane to  which the  AMOC
    applies,  notify  your   principal  maintenance  inspector   (PMI)  or
    principal  avionics  inspector  (PAI), as  appropriate,  or  lacking a
    principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.  The
    AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement  in this  AD,
    under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(i) Refer to MCAI  Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-23,  dated May
    19, 2009, and the  Bombardier modification summary packages  listed in
    Table 1 of this AD, for related information.

Issued in Renton, Washington on  March 4, 2010. Suzanne Masterson,  Acting
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 29, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2010-0223;  Directorate  Identifier  2009-NM-105-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet
Series 100 & 440),  CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series  700, 701 & 702),  CL
-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet  Series
900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Several cases of  corrosion in lower  structural members of  the passenger
door have been  reported. It was  subsequently determined that  a drainage
ramp (constructed from resin) had deteriorated with time and was retaining
moisture. *  * *  Corrosion left  undetected could  eventually affect  the
structural integrity of the door and surrounding structure.

The proposed  AD would  require actions  that are  intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 29, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-40,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m., Monday through  Friday, except
Federal holidays.

For  service   information  identified   in  this   proposed  AD,  contact
Bombardier,  Inc.,  400 Cote  Vertu  Road West,  Dorval,  Quebec H4S  1Y9,
Canada;     telephone    514-855-5000;     fax    514-855-7401;     e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet  http://www.bombardier.com. You  may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,  Transport
Airplane  Directorate,  1601  Lind Avenue,  SW.,  Renton,  Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call  425-227
-1221 or 425-227-1152.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You may examine the AD docket on the  Internet at  http://www.regulations.
gov; or in  person at the  Docket Operations office  between 9 a.m.  and 5
p.m.,  Monday  through  Friday, except  Federal  holidays.  The AD  docket
contains  this  proposed  AD,  the  regulatory  evaluation,  any  comments
received,  and  other  information.  The  street  address  for  the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Yates, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and  Mechanical   Systems  Branch,   ANE-171,  FAA,   New  York   Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart  Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,  New York
11590; telephone (516) 228-7355; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your  comments to an address listed  under the ADD-
RESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2010-0223; Directorate  Identifier
2009-NM-105-AD" at the beginning of your comments. We specifically  invite
comments on  the overall  regulatory, economic,  environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that address
MCAI  originated by  aviation authorities  of other  countries to  provide
adequate  time  for interested  parties  to submit  comments.  The comment
period  for  these  proposed  ADs  is  now  typically  45  days,  which is
consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

Transport  Canada  Civil Aviation,  which  is the  aviation  authority for
Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-23, dated  May
19, 2009  (referred to  after this  as "the  MCAI"), to  correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

Several cases of  corrosion in lower  structural members of  the passenger
door have been  reported. It was  subsequently determined that  a drainage
ramp (constructed from resin) had deteriorated with time and was retaining
moisture. The ramp, therefore,  requires removal, both to  prevent further
corrosion and  to allow  full access  to the  door structure during future
scheduled inspections. Corrosion  left undetected could  eventually affect
the structural integrity of the door and surrounding structure.

The required actions include a general visual inspection for corrosion and
damage of the lower  inner section of the  door, repair if necessary,  and
application  of  corrosion  inhibitor  compound.  You  may  obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Bombardier  has issued  the modification  summary packages  listed in  the
following table.  The actions  described in  this service  information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

                           SERVICE INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     BOMBARDIER SERVICE
     MODEL              INFORMATION         REVISION        DATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-2B19.      Bombardier Modification   A1......   April 24, 2009.
                  Summary IS601R52110030.
CL-600-2C10,
CL-600-2D15 and
CL-600-2D24.      Bombardier Modification   A1......   April 24, 2009.
                  Summary IS67052110074.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with the  State of Design Authority, we  have been
notified  of  the  unsafe  condition described  in  the  MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all  pertinent information  and determined  an unsafe  condition
exists and is  likely to exist  or develop on  other products of  the same
type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD  would
affect about  1,072 products  of U.S.  registry. We  also estimate that it
would  take about  28 work-hours  per product  to comply  with the   basic
requirements of this proposed AD.  Required parts would cost about  $0 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed  that there will be no charge  for
these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected  parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $2,551,360, or $2,380 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it  addresses  an unsafe  condition  that  is likely  to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory  Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: