|
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration,
DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for the specified Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) model helicopters.
The existing AD requires certain inspections of a main rotor blade (blade)
manufactured under a Parts Manufacturer Approval under Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) SH778GL. The AD requires inspecting each affected root
end bolt (bolt) and bolt-hole for corrosion or a crack on the blade root
end fitting (fitting) or in a bolt-hole. For certain serial-numbered blades,
the AD also requires a one-time pull test on each fitting and blade root
end doubler (doubler) to detect disbonding. This AD requires certain inspections
for voids in any doubler or fitting and for paint cracks along the forward
and aft edge of the blade fitting. Also, this AD requires inspecting the
blade tip weight housing attachment. This AD also requires replacing unairworthy
blades with airworthy blades. This amendment is prompted by reports from
the STC holder of disbonds at the fittings, doublers, and the tip weight
fitting. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent blade
failure and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective February 12, 2010.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of February 12,
2010.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before
March 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments
on this AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from Phlight
of Phancy Corp. (PPC), 791 Westport Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177-4511,
telephone 817-491-6755, fax 817-491-6759.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the AD,
any comments, and other information on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov,
or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is located in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the West Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Martin
R. Crane, ASW-170, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft
Certification Office, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137, telephone
(817) 222-5170, fax (817) 222-5783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 16, 2003, the FAA issued an
Emergency AD 2003-15-51. That Emergency AD was published as a final rule
on August 28, 2003 (68 FR 51681). The current AD requires certain inspections
of a blade manufactured under a PMA issued and based on STC SH778GL. The
AD requires inspecting each bolt and bolt-hole for corrosion or a crack
on the fitting or in a bolt-hole on each affected blade. For certain serial-numbered
blades, the AD also requires a one- time pull test on each fitting and
doubler to detect disbonding. That action was prompted by a report from
the blade manufacturer of the discovery of a cracked blade. In that action,
we stated that the cause of the crack remained under investigation. That
condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of a blade and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
Since issuing that AD, bond failures continue to be found in certain blades
produced under a Parts Manufacturer Approval based on STC SH778GL. These
bond failures occurred even after the inspections specified by Rotor Trends
LLC Service Bulletin (SB) No. 01.03, dated July 9, 2003 (Rotor Trends
SB), and required by AD 2003-15-51. Pflight of Phancy Corp. (PPC), the
current STC holder, has issued Service Bulletin No. SB L3160-P-001, dated
May 20, 2009 (PPC SB), to supersede the Rotor Trends SB. The PPC SB specifies
visual and tap inspections of the blade root fittings and doublers. The
PPC SB also specifies replacing certain blades that have voids or paint
cracks and inspecting the blade tip weight housing on the outboard end
of the blade. Finally, the PPC SB specifies removing all affected blades
by May 20, 2010, or 500 hours time-in-service (TIS), whichever occurs
first. This AD does not require replacing the blades at 500 hours TIS.
However, replacing the affected blades with airworthy blades to which
this AD does not apply would be terminating action for the requirements
of this AD.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist
or develop on other Eurocopter model helicopters of these same type designs,
this AD supersedes AD 2003-15-51 to require the following:
Within 10 hours TIS, inspect each affected blade in the doublers for a
void and in the forward and aft edges for a paint crack.
If you do not find a void or paint crack in the doublers or fitting, and
the only void you find is isolated in a .25 inch edge band of any doubler
or a fitting, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 30 hours
TIS.
If you find a void in any doubler or either fitting not isolated in a
.25 inch band or a paint crack of any length along the forward or aft
edge of the fitting at certain blade stations, replace the blade with
an airworthy blade before further flight.
Within 10 hours TIS, tap and visually inspect each affected blade:
Remove the paint, and coin tap inspect the upper and lower surface of
the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing bond for a bond void.
Using a 10X or higher magnifying glass, visually inspect the No. 1 spar
around through pins for hole elongation, a crack in the spar, and pin
movement (pins should be flush with upper and lower spar surfaces). Visually
inspect the tip weight housing outboard face for movement relative to
the spar (tip weight housing should be flush with the face of No. 1 and
2 spars).
Measure the thickness of the upper and lower spar by using calipers held
against the face of the No. 1 spar in alignment with the through pins.
If you find any of the following, replace the blade with an airworthy
blade before further flight:
A void between the No. 2 spar to tip weight housing;
In the No. 1 spar, either a crack, an elongated through pin hole, movement
of a through pin, or a through pin that is not flush with the spar surface;
Movement of the tip weight housing or a tip weight housing that is not
flush with the No. 1 or 2 spar; or
An upper or lower spar measures less than 0.045 inch.
If you do not find any of these discrepancies, repeat the inspection at
intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS.
Replacing an affected blade with an airworthy blade, with a serial number
that is not included in the "Applicability'' section of this AD, constitutes
terminating action for the requirements of this AD.
Do the actions by following the specified portions of the SB described
previously.
The short compliance time involved is required because the previously
described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the controllability
or structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore, inspecting each
blade within 10 hours TIS, repeating the inspection at intervals not to
exceed 30 hours TIS, and replacing the blades as necessary before further
flight are very short compliance times, and this AD must be issued immediately.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this
regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment
hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA estimates that this AD will affect 30 helicopters. The required
actions will take about 3 work hours to inspect a blade and 3 work hours
to replace a blade at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required
parts will cost about $50,000 per blade. There are three blades per helicopter.
Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the AD on
U.S. operators to be $3,588,640, assuming 71 blades are replaced.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment;
however, we invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments
regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include "Docket No. FAA-2010-0047; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-28-AD''
at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on
the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and
may amend the AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning
this AD. Using the search function of our docket Web site, you can find
and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the
individual who sent the comment. You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify
that the regulation:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle
VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, "General requirements.'' Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods,
and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified
in this rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-13276 (68 FR 51681,
dated August 28, 2003), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD),
Amendment 39-16177, to read as follows:
|