preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE AERONAUTICA S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-2010-0170; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-127-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by April 12, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This  AD  applies  to  all  Empresa  Brasileira  de  Aeronautica  S.A.
    (EMBRAER)  Model  EMB-135ER,  -135KE,  -135KL,  and  -135LR airplanes;
    EMBRAER  Model EMB-145, -145ER,  -145MR,  -145LR, -145XR, -145MP,  and
    -145EP airplanes; certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

Reassessment  of  the  damage  tolerance  analysis  resulted  in threshold
reduction for some  Structure Significant Items  (SSI) of the  Maintenance
Review Board Report (MRBR) Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI).  Failure
to inspect these  structural components, according  to the new  threshold,
could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracking. These cracks, if not
properly addressed, could adversely affect the structural integrity of the
airplane.
* * * * *

COMPLIANCE

(f) You  are responsible  for  having the  actions  required  by  this  AD
    performed within  the compliance  times specified,  unless the actions
    have already been done.

ACTIONS

(g) Within 90 days after the  effective date of this AD, do  the following
    actions, as applicable.

(1) For EMBRAER Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL, and -135LR airplanes, and
    Model EMB-145, -145EP, -145ER,  -145LR, -145MP, and -145MR  airplanes:
    Revise the  Airworthiness Limitations  (ALS) of  the Instructions  for
    Continued Airworthiness  (ICA) to  incorporate Tasks  54-50-00-230-802
    -A00 and 54-50-00-220-808-A01  specified in Appendix  2, Airworthiness
    Limitation Requirements, of  EMBRAER EMB135/EMB145 Maintenance  Review
    Board Report MRB-145/1150, Revision 12, dated September 19, 2008  (the
    "MRBR"). The  initial compliance  times for  the tasks  start from the
    applicable threshold specified  in Appendix 2  of the MRBR,  or within
    500  flight cycles  after the  effective date  of this  AD,  whichever
    occurs later.

(2) For EMBRAER  Model EMB-145EP, -145ER,  -145LR, -145MR, and -145MP air-
    planes: Revise the ALS of  the ICA to incorporate  Tasks  57-26-00-250
    -815-A00,  57-26-00-250-815-A01,  57-26-00-250-813-A00,  and  57-26-00
    -250-813-A02,  specified  in  Appendix  2,  Airworthiness   Limitation
    Requirements, of EMBRAER EMB135/EMB145 Maintenance Review Board Report
    MRB-145/1150, Revision 12, dated September 19, 2008 ("the MRBR").  The
    initial compliance  times for  the tasks  start from  the later of the
    times specified in paragraph (g)(2)(i) or (g)(2)(ii) of this AD.

(i) At the later of the  applicable thresholds specified in Appendix 2  of
    the MRBR or within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of  this
    AD, whichever occurs later.

(ii) At the  applicable  time  specified in  Section A2.3.2.3.1,  "Fatigue
     Threshold   Reduced,"   of  Appendix   2,   Airworthiness  Limitation
     Requirements, of the MRBR.

(3) For all airplanes: Revise the  ALS of the ICA to incorporate  Tasks 57
    -10-00-250-801-A00  and  57-10-00-250-801-A01  specified  in   EMBRAER
    Temporary  Revision  12-1, dated  November  27, 2008,  to  the EMBRAER
    EMB135/EMB145 Maintenance Review  Board Report MRB-145/1150,  Revision
    12, dated  September 19,  2008. The  initial compliance  times for the
    tasks  start  at  the  times  specified  in  paragraphs  (g)(3)(i) and
    (g)(3)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.

(i) For  Task 57-10-00-250-801-A00:  Prior to  the accumulation  of 23,600
    total flight cycles, or within  500 flight cycles after the  effective
    date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(ii) For Task 57-10-00-250-801-A01: Within 24,000 flight cycles after acc-
     omplishing EMBRAER  Service Bulletin  145-57-0047, dated  October 18,
     2008, or within  500 flight cycles  after the effective  date of this
     AD, whichever occurs later.

(h) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
    no  alternative  inspections, inspection  intervals,  or airworthiness
    limitations may be used unless the inspections, inspection  intervals,
    or airworthiness  limitations are  approved as  alternative method  of
    compliance in  accordance with  the procedures  specified in paragraph
    (i) of this AD.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 1: This AD differs from the  MCAI and/or service information as foll-
ows: No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,  International
    Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate FAA, has the authority
    to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures  found
    in 14 CFR  39.19. Send information  to ATTN: Todd  Thompson, Aerospace
    Engineer,   International   Branch,   ANM-116,   Transport    Airplane
    Directorate,  FAA, 1601  Lind Avenue,  SW., Renton,  Washington  98057
    -3356; telephone (425) 227-1175; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using  any
    approved AMOC on any airplane  to which the AMOC applies,  notify your
    principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics  inspector
    (PAI), as appropriate,  or lacking a  principal inspector, your  local
    Flight  Standards  District  Office.  The  AMOC  approval  letter must
    specifically reference this AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting  requirement in this AD, un-
    der the provisions of the  Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.  3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(j) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2009-05-02,  effective
    June  1, 2009;  EMBRAER Temporary  Revision 12-1,  dated November  27,
    2008, to  the EMBRAER  EMB135/EMB145 Maintenance  Review Board  Report
    MRB-145/1150, Revision 12, dated  September 19, 2008; and  Tasks 54-50
    -00-230-802-A00  and  54-50-00-220-808-A01  specified  in  Appendix 2,
    Airworthiness  Limitation   Requirements,  of   EMBRAER  EMB135/EMB145
    Maintenance  Review  Board  Report  MRB-145/1150,  Revision  12, dated
    September 19, 2008; for related information.

Issued  in Renton,  Washington, on  February 17,  2010. Stephen  P.  Boyd,
Acting  Manager,  Transport Airplane  Directorate,  Aircraft Certification
Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 12, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2010-0170;  Directorate  Identifier  2009-NM-127-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER)
Model EMB-135ER, -135KE, -135KL,  and -135LR Airplanes; and  EMBRAER Model
EMB-145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR, -145XR, -145MP, and -
145EP Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Reassessment  of  the  damage  tolerance  analysis  resulted  in threshold
reduction for some  Structure Significant Items  (SSI) of the  Maintenance
Review Board Report (MRBR) Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI).  Failure
to inspect these  structural components, according  to the new  threshold,
could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracking. These cracks, if not
properly addressed, could adversely affect the structural integrity of the
airplane.
* * * * *

The proposed  AD would  require actions  that are  intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 12, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-40,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m., Monday through  Friday, except
Federal holidays.

For service information  identified in this  proposed AD, contact  Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica  S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical  Publications Section
(PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro  Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--12227-901 Sao  Jose dos
Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone: +55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732;  fax:
+55  12  3927-7546;  e-mail:  distrib@embraer.com.br;  Internet:   http://
www.flyembraer.com.  You  may  review  copies  of  the  referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind  Avenue,
SW.,  Renton,  Washington. For  information  on the  availability  of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office  between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The  AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any  comments
received,  and  other  information.  The  street  address  for  the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, Inter-
national Branch, ANM-116, Transport  Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601  Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1175;  fax
(425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments to an  address listed  under the ADD-
RESSES section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2010-0170; Directorate  Identifier
2009-NM-127-AD" at the beginning of your comments. We specifically  invite
comments on  the overall  regulatory, economic,  environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that address
MCAI  originated by  aviation authorities  of other  countries to  provide
adequate  time  for interested  parties  to submit  comments.  The comment
period  for  these  proposed  ADs  is  now  typically  45  days,  which is
consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The  Agencia  Nacional  De  Aviacao  Civil--Brazil  (ANAC),  which  is the
airworthiness  authority for  Brazil, has  issued Brazilian  Airworthiness
Directive 2009-05-02, effective  June 1, 2009  (referred to after  this as
"the MCAI"), to  correct an unsafe  condition for the  specified products.
The MCAI states:

Reassessment  of  the  damage  tolerance  analysis  resulted  in threshold
reduction for some  Structure Significant Items  (SSI) of the  Maintenance
Review Board Report (MRBR) Airworthiness Limitations Items (ALI).  Failure
to inspect these  structural components, according  to the new  threshold,
could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracking. These cracks, if not
properly addressed, could adversely affect the structural integrity of the
airplane.
* * * * *

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Embraer has issued  Temporary Revision 12-1,  dated November 27,  2008, to
the EMBRAER  EMB135/EMB145 Maintenance  Review Board  Report MRB-145/1150,
Revision  12, dated  September 19,  2008. The  actions  described  in this
service  information  are  intended   to  correct  the  unsafe   condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with the  State of Design Authority, we  have been
notified  of  the  unsafe  condition described  in  the  MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all  pertinent information  and determined  an unsafe  condition
exists and is  likely to exist  or develop on  other products of  the same
type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD  would
affect about 711 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1 work-hour per  product to comply with the  basic requirements
of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD on U.S.  operators
to be $60,435, or $85 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely  to exist or dev-
elop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the  DOT Regulatory Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: