preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATION (TYPE CERTIFICATE NO. A00010WI PREVIOUSLY HELD BY RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY): Docket No. FAA-2010-0158; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-006-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments  on this airworthiness directive (AD)  action
    by April 9, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD  applies to Model 390 airplanes,  serial  numbers RB-4 through
    RB-248, that are certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 24: Electric Power.

UNSAFE CONDITION

(e) This AD results from a report that the metal oxide varistor (MOV)  and
    spark gap wiring of the essential bus lightning strike protection were
    swapped.  We  are  issuing  this AD  to  detect  and  correct improper
    installation of the  MOV and spark  gap wiring, which  could result in
    overload of the MOV in a lightning strike and allow electrical  energy
    to continue to the essential  bus and disable equipment that  receives
    power from the essential bus. The disabled equipment could include the
    autopilot,  anti-skid  system,  hydraulic  indicator,  spoiler system,
    pilot primary flight display, audio panel, or the 1 air data computer.
    This failure could  lead to a  significant increase in  pilot workload
    during adverse operating conditions.

COMPLIANCE

(f) To  address this  problem, you  must do  the following, unless already
    done:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
           ACTIONS                 COMPLIANCE            PROCEDURES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the essential      Within the next 200      Follow Hawker
 bus lightning strike           hours time-in-           Mandatory Service
 protection for proper          service after the        Bulletin SB 24-
 installation of MOV and        effective date of        3995, issued
 spark gap wiring.              this AD or within        September 2009.
                                the next 12 months
                                after the effective
                                date of this AD,
                                whichever occurs
                                first.

(2) Where improper wiring      Before further           Follow Hawker
 installation is found,         flight after the         Mandatory Service
 rework the essential bus       inspection in            Bulletin SB 24-
 lightning strike wiring        paragraph (f)(1) of      3995, issued
 installation for the MOV       this AD.                 September 2009.
 and spark gap.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE (AMOCS)

(g) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
    authority  to  approve  AMOCs  for this  AD,  if  requested  using the
    procedures found  in 14  CFR 39.19.  Send information  to ATTN:  Kevin
    Schwemmer,  Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,  Wichita  Aircraft Certification
    Office  (ACO), 1801  Airport Road,  Room 100,  Wichita, Kansas  67209;
    telephone:   (316)    946-4174;   fax:    (316)   946-4107;    e-mail:
    kevin.schwemmer@faa.gov.  Before  using  any  approved  AMOC  on   any
    airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate  principal
    inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),  or
    lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) To  get  copies  of  the  service  information referenced  in this AD,
    contact  Hawker Beechcraft  Corporation, 9709  East Central,  Wichita,
    Kansas  67201;  telephone:   (316)  676-5034;  fax:   (316)  676-6614;
    Internet:  https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/service_support/pubs/.  To
    view the AD  docket, go to  U.S. Department of  Transportation, Docket
    Operations, M-30, West Building  Ground Floor, Room W12-140,  1200 New
    Jersey  Avenue,  SE., Washington,  DC  20590, or  on  the Internet  at
    http://www.regulations.gov.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 16, 2010. Kim Smith, Manager,
Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 9, 2010.

PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0158; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-006-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (Type
Certificate No. A00010WI Previously Held by Raytheon Aircraft Company)
Model 390 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  We  propose to  adopt  a new  airworthiness  directive (AD)  for
certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation  Model 390 airplanes. This  proposed
AD  would  require  you  to inspect  the  essential  bus  lightning strike
protection for proper installation of metal oxide varistor (MOV) and spark
gap wiring. This proposed AD would  also require you to rework the  wiring
as necessary  to achieve  the required  lightning strike/surge protection.
This proposed AD results from a report that the wires to the MOV and spark
gap were swapped. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct  improper
installation  of the  MOV and  spark gap  wiring,  which  could result  in
overload of the MOV in a  lightning strike and allow electrical energy  to
continue to the  essential bus and  disable equipment that  receives power
from  the  essential  bus.  The  disabled  equipment  could  include   the
autopilot, anti-skid  system, hydraulic  indicator, spoiler  system, pilot
primary flight  display, audio  panel, or  the 1  air data  computer. This
failure could  lead to  a significant  increase in  pilot workload  during
adverse operating conditions.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 9, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this  proposed
AD:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow  the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

For service  information identified  in this  proposed AD,  contact Hawker
Beechcraft  Corporation,  9709   East  Central,  Wichita,   Kansas  67201;
telephone:    (316)    676-5034;    fax:    (316)    676-6614;   Internet:
https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/service_support/pubs/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Schwemmer, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room  100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:  (316) 946-4174; fax: (316)  946-4107; e
-mail: kevin.schwemmer@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We  invite you  to send  any written  relevant data,  views, or  arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed  under
the  ADDRESSES  section.  Include  the  docket  number,  "FAA-  2010-0158;
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-006-AD" at the beginning of your  comments.
We  specifically  invite  comments on  the  overall  regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by  the closing date  and may amend  the proposed AD  in
light of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

We received  a report  that on  a Hawker  Beechcraft Corporation Model 390
airplane the  wires to  the MOV  and spark  gap were  swapped. The swapped
wires were discovered during  an inspection following a  lightning strike.
The spark gap has a higher current carrying capability than the MOV and is
designed to  carry direct  currents caused  by a  lightning strike. In the
event of a lightning strike, the potential exists to overload the MOV  and
allow an electrical spike to pass through to the essential bus.

This  condition,  if  not  corrected,  could  allow  electrical  energy to
continue to the  essential bus and  disable equipment that  receives power
from  the  essential  bus.  The  disabled  equipment  could  include   the
autopilot, anti-skid  system, hydraulic  indicator, spoiler  system, pilot
primary flight  display, audio  panel, or  the 1  air data  computer. This
failure could  lead to  a significant  increase in  pilot workload  during
adverse operating conditions.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB  24-3995,
issued September  2009. The  service information  describes procedures for
inspecting  the  essential  bus  lightning  strike  protection  for proper
installation of  MOV and  spark gap  wiring. The  service information also
describes  procedures  for rework  as  necessary to  achieve  the required
lightning strike/surge protection.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we  evaluated  all  information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD  would
require you to inspect the  essential bus lightning strike protection  for
proper installation of  MOV and spark  gap wiring. This  proposed AD would
also require you to rework the wiring as necessary to achieve the required
lightning strike/surge protection.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We estimate that this proposed AD  would affect 170 airplanes in the  U.S.
registry.

We estimate the  following costs to  do the proposed  inspection (includes
any necessary follow-on action):

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      TOTAL COST PER   TOTAL COST ON
               LABOR COST             PARTS COST         AIRPLANE      U.S. OPERATORS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255  Not applicable.......  $255          $43,350
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Warranty credit may be given to the extent specified in Hawker  Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 24-3995, issued September 2009.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA  Administrator. Subtitle VII,  Aviation Programs, describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking  under the authority described in  Subtitle
VII, Part  A, Subpart  III, Section  44701, "General  requirements." Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is likely  to  exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We  have  determined  that  this proposed  AD  would  not  have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not  have
a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the
national Government and  the States, or  on the distribution  of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not  a "significant  rule" under  the  DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the  Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You  may  examine  the  AD  docket  that  contains  the  proposed  AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on the
Internet  at  http://www.regulations.gov;  or  in  person  at  the  Docket
Management Facility  between 9  a.m. and  5 p.m.,  Monday through  Friday,
except Federal holidays. The  Docket Office (telephone (800)  647-5527) is
located at the  street address stated  in the ADDRESSES  section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC.  39.13  [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: