preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD BOMBARDIER, INC. (FORMERLY CANADAIR): Docket No. FAA-2009-0525; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-027-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by January 19, 2010.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) This AD supersedes AD 2003-04-21 R1, Amendment 39-13070.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to  Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet  Series
    100 &  440) airplanes,  certificated in  any category,  serial numbers
    7003 and subsequent.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 11: Placards and mark-
    ings.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

AD CF-2002-12 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-04-21, amendment 39-13070]
mandated installation of revised overwing emergency exit placards  showing
that the exit door should be  opened and disposed from a seated  position.
However, it  was later  discovered that  the new  placards illustrated  an
incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover.  These
incorrect instructions could  cause difficulty or  delay when opening  the
overwing emergency exit.

As a result, the timely and safe evacuation of passengers and crew may  be
impeded. The  required action  includes replacing  the incorrect  placards
with revised placards.

RESTATEMENT OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF AD 2003-04-21 R1

(f) Unless already done, for airplanes  identified in Table 1 of this  AD,
    within 12 months after  April 4, 2003 (the  effective date of AD  2003
    -04-21 R1), replace the door weight placards, and no-baggage  placards
    with new placards (including  cleaning of the applicable  surface), as
    applicable,  per  Bombardier  Alert  Service  Bulletin   A601R-11-077,
    Revision  A,  dated  December  11,  2001,  excluding  Service Bulletin
    Comment Sheet-Facsimile Reply Sheet  and CRJ 100/200 Service  Bulletin
    Compliance Facsimile Reply Sheet.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         TABLE 1--SERIAL NUMBERS                          
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               SERIAL NOS.

                      7003 through 7434 inclusive.
                      7436 through 7442 inclusive.
                      7444 through 7452 inclusive.
                      7454 through 7458 inclusive.
                      7460 through 7497 inclusive.
                      7499 through 7504 inclusive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(g) Replacement accomplished  before April 4,  2003, per Bombardier  Alert
    Service  Bulletin A601R-11-077,  dated July  12, 2001,  is  considered
    acceptable for compliance with the replacement specified in  paragraph
    (f) of this AD.

NEW REQUIREMENTS OF THIS AD

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(h) Unless already done, within 24 months after the effective date of this
    AD, replace  the existing  overwing emergency  exit placards  with new
    placards  in  accordance  with  the  Accomplishment  Instructions   of
    Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, Revision `A,' dated March 24,
    2009.

(i) Replacing  the overwing  emergency  exit placards  with  new  placards
    before the  effective date  of this  AD in  accordance with Bombardier
    Service  Bulletin  601R-11-088,  dated June  25,  2008,  is considered
    acceptable for compliance with  the corresponding action specified  in
    this AD.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 1: This  AD differs  from the  MCAI  and/or  service  information  as
follows:  The  MCAI  applicability  includes  certain  airplanes.  This AD
expands the applicability to include  serial numbers 7003 and  subsequent.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The  Manager, New York Air-
    craft Certification Office,  FAA, has the  authority to approve  AMOCs
    for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR  39.19.
    Send  information  to ATTN:  Christopher  Alfano, Aerospace  Engineer,
    Airframe  and  Mechanical  Systems  Branch,  ANE-171,  FAA,  New  York
    Aircraft  Certification  Office,  1600  Stewart  Avenue,  Suite   410,
    Westbury,  New York  11590; telephone  (516) 228-7340;  fax (516)  794
    -5531. Before  using any  approved AMOC  on any  airplane to which the
    AMOC applies,  notify your  principal maintenance  inspector (PMI)  or
    principal  avionics  inspector  (PAI), as  appropriate,  or  lacking a
    principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.  The
    AMOC  approval  letter  must  specifically  reference  this  AD. AMOCs
    approved previously  in accordance  with AD  2003-04-21, Amendment  39
    -13070, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this
    AD.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement  in this  AD,
    under the  provisions of  the Paperwork  Reduction Act,  the Office of
    Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the information collection
    requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(k)  Refer  to  MCAI Canadian  Airworthiness  Directive  CF-2009-02, dated
    January 19,  2009; Bombardier  Alert  Service  Bulletin  A601R-11-077,
    Revision A, dated December  11, 2001; and Bombardier  Service Bulletin
    601R-11-088,  Revision  `A,'  dated   March  24,  2009;  for   related
    information.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 11, 2009. Ali Bahrami,  Manager,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 19, 2010.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0525; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-027-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Bombardier  Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Ser-
ies 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental  notice of  proposed rulemaking  (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are  revising an earlier  NPRM for the  products listed above.
This action revises the earlier NPRM by expanding the scope. This proposed
AD  results  from mandatory  continuing  airworthiness information  (MCAI)
originated by  an aviation  authority of  another country  to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the
unsafe condition as:

AD CF-2002-12 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2003-04-21, amendment 39-13070]
mandated installation of revised overwing emergency exit placards  showing
that the exit door should be  opened and disposed from a seated  position.
However, it  was later  discovered that  the new  placards illustrated  an
incorrect hand position for removal of the exit upper handle cover.  These
incorrect instructions could  cause difficulty or  delay when opening  the
overwing emergency exit.

As a result, the timely and safe evacuation of passengers and crew may  be
impeded.  The  proposed AD  would  require actions  that  are intended  to
address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 19, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue   SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-40,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m., Monday through  Friday, except
Federal holidays.

For  service   information  identified   in  this   proposed  AD,  contact
Bombardier,  Inc.,  400  Cote-Vertu Road  West,  Dorval,  Quebec H4S  1Y9,
Canada;     telephone    514-855-5000;     fax    514-855-7401;     e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet  http://www.bombardier.com. You  may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,  Transport
Airplane  Directorate,  1601  Lind Avenue,  SW.,  Renton,  Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call  425-227
-1221 or 425-227-1152.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You may examine the AD docket on the  Internet at  http://www.regulations.
gov; or in  person at the  Docket Operations office  between 9 a.m.  and 5
p.m.,  Monday  through  Friday, except  Federal  holidays.  The AD  docket
contains  this  proposed  AD,  the  regulatory  evaluation,  any  comments
received,  and  other  information.  The  street  address  for  the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher  Alfano,  Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical  Systems Branch, ANE-171,  FAA, New York  Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart  Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,  New York
11590; telephone (516) 228-7340; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed under   the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2009-0525;   Directorate
Identifier  2009-NM-027-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
based on those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

We proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 with an earlier NPRM for the specified
products, which was published in the Federal Register on June 10, 2009 (74
FR  27474). That  earlier NPRM  proposed to  require  actions  intended to
address the unsafe condition for the products listed above.

Since that NPRM was issued,  we have revised the applicability  to include
all Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes
with serial numbers 7003 and  subsequent because those serial numbers  may
have incorrect placards.

COMMENTS

We have considered the following comments received on the earlier NPRM.

SUPPORT FOR THE NPRM

Robert  Edward  Briggs,  a  private  citizen,  and  Mesa  Air  support the
compliance times in the NPRM. Mr.  Briggs states that Bombardier has a  26
-week lead time on the new placards, so the compliance time should  remain
at 24 months from  the effective date of  the AD. Mesa Air  states that it
supports the 24-month  compliance time because  of the 26-week  lead time,
and because of the requirement  to revise and replace the  PAX (passenger)
briefing cards.

REQUEST TO WITHDRAW NPRM

Rich Rupslauskas, a private citizen,  requests that we withdraw the  NPRM.
Mr. Rupslauskas asserts that the change depicted in the new placard is not
necessary and does nothing to  enhance safety. The commenter supports  his
request by having asked four  different people to identify the  difference
between the old and  the new placards and  they were unable to  do so. The
commenter asserts that if there was  a problem with the placard, it  would
have  already been  discovered through  training, maintenance,  evacuation
testing, and actual evacuations.

We do not agree with the commenter's request to withdraw the proposed  AD.
We  find  the   commenter's  sample  size   too  small  to   constitute  a
representative  statistical sample  with which  to determine  an  adequate
level of safety. The  illustration in the new  placard is correct. 14  CFR
25.811(e)(1)  requires  that "The  location  of the  operating  handle and
instructions for  opening exits  from the  inside of  the airplane must be
shown in  the following  manner: (1)  Each passenger  emergency exit  must
have, on or near the exit, a  marking that is readable from a distance  of
30 inches * * *"  Incorrect instructions could cause difficulty  or delay,
especially to persons  who are less  familiar with the  airplane emergency
exit door  openings. We  have not  changed the  supplemental NPRM  in this
regard.

REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS OF AD 2003-04-21

Comair Inc. states that AD 2003-04-21 requires actions to be  accomplished
in  accordance  with  Bombardier  Alert  Service  Bulletin   A601R-11-077,
Revision A,  dated December  11, 2001.  That AD  required installing a new
overwing exit placard,  and relocates two  other placards: The  no-baggage
placard and  the door  weight  placard.  (The no-baggage  placards are the
placards  that illustrate  no baggage,  and are  identified in  Bombardier
Service Bulletin as  "Placard No Baggage.")  Comair states that  this NPRM
requires compliance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, Revision
A, dated  March 24,  2009. Comair  states that  Revision A  of the service
bulletin addresses  only the  latest overwing  exit placard,  and does not
address moving the other two placards.

We infer  that the  commenter is  asking for  clarification regarding  the
requirements of this  supplemental NPRM for  the door weight  placards and
the  no-baggage  placards.   We  have  revised   paragraph  (f)  of   this
supplemental NPRM to clarify that the restated requirements include moving
the door weight placards and no-baggage placards.

REQUEST TO SHORTEN COMPLIANCE TIME

Comair requests that we revise the NPRM to shorten the 24-month compliance
time to 9  months. Comair states  that the compliance  time appears to  be
based on Canadian Airworthiness  Directive CF-2009-02, which concurs  with
the recommended interval specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin  601R-11
-088, Revision `A,' dated March 24, 2009. Comair states that the  24-month
compliance time seems  excessive based on  the simplicity of  the required
task.  Comair states  that nine  months should  be sufficient  to  procure
parts,  write work  instructions, and  comply with  the service  bulletin.
Comair estimates that one-third of the U.S.-registered fleet is already in
compliance.

We disagree with the request to reduce the compliance time from 24  months
to 9 months. The proposed compliance  time of 24 months was determined  to
be appropriate in  consideration of the  safety implications, the  average
utilization  rate  of the  affected  fleet, the  practical  aspects of  an
orderly inspection of  the fleet during  regular maintenance periods,  and
the availability of required modification  parts. We have not changed  the
AD in this regard.

REQUEST FOR CREDIT FOR PREVIOUSLY ISSUED AMOCS

Comair  requests that  we revise  the NPRM  to allow  credit for  placards
installed according  to a  previously given  AMOC. Comair  writes that  it
received an  AMOC, dated  December 14,  2007, which  allowed it to install
overwing  exit  placards,  part  numbers  S8388-1  and  S8389-1,  that are
specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088, Revision `A,'  dated
March 24, 2009. Comair states that it completed installing these  placards
on its entire fleet three months before the initial release of the service
bulletin.

We agree with the commenter's request. We have revised paragraph (j)(1) of
this  supplemental  NPRM  to  allow  credit  for  placards  installed   in
accordance with  previously issued  AMOCs to  AD 2003-04-21  issued by the
NYACO on December 14, 2007, allowing the installation of the new  overwing
exit placards, part numbers S8388-1  and S8389-1. These are the  same part
numbers installed using Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-11-088,  Revision
A, dated March 24, 2009.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with the  State of Design Authority, we  have been
notified  of  the  unsafe  condition described  in  the  MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all  pertinent information  and determined  an unsafe  condition
exists and is  likely to exist  or develop on  other products of  the same
type design.

Certain changes described above expand the scope of the earlier NPRM. As a
result, we  have determined  that it  is necessary  to reopen  the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on this
proposed AD.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD  would
affect about 664 products of U.S. registry.

We estimate that  it would take  about 1 work-hour  per product to  comply
with the  new basic  requirements of  this proposed  AD. The average labor
rate  is $80  per work-hour.  Required parts  would cost  about $128   per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed  that there will be no charge  for
these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected  parties,
some parties may  incur costs higher  than estimated here.  Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of  the proposed AD on U.S. operators  to be
$138,112, or $208 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition  that is likely to  exist or dev-
elop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and  responsib-
ilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory  Policies and Pro-
   cedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-13070 (68 FR  9509,
   February  28, 2003),  corrected at  68 FR  14309, March  25, 2003,  and
   adding the following new AD: