preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD.: Docket No. FAA-2009-0509; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-029-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by July 6, 2009.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD  applies to PC-7  airplanes, all manufacturer  serial numbers,
    certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53: Fuselage.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to reported corrosion on
the bolts  and in  the bores  of the  attachment fittings  for the  engine
mounting frame. The corrosion is caused by damaged cadmium plating of  the
bolts or damaged surface finish of the attachment fitting.

Such a condition, if left  uncorrected, could lead to crack  initiation at
the bolt  and the  fitting bore  and subsequently  to the  failure of  the
engine attachment fitting.

In order to correct and control  the situation, this AD requires a  visual
inspection  of  the  relevant   bolts  and  fittings.  Additionally,   the
replacement of the bolts is required.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) Visually inspect the bolts and the bores (with boroscope) of  the att-
    achment fittings for the engine mounting frame following paragraph 3.A
    of PILATUS  Aircraft Ltd.  Pilatus PC-7  Service Bulletin  No. 53-006,
    dated November 17, 2008, at whichever of the following occurs later:

(i) Upon accumulating 5,000 hours  total time-in-service (TIS) or 5  years
    from the date of manufacture, whichever occurs first; or

(ii) Within the next 6 months after the effective date of this AD.

(2) If no  sign of corrosion  is found during  the inspection required  in
    paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the bolts.
    Repetitively inspect  thereafter at  intervals not  to exceed  every 5
    years following PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-7 Maintenance  Manual
    Chapter 05-10-20, page 4, dated November 30, 2008.

(3) If any sign of corrosion is found  during any of the  inspections req-
    uired  in paragraphs  (f)(1) and  (f)(2) of  this AD,  before  further
    flight, do the corrective actions following paragraph 3.A. of  PILATUS
    Aircraft  Ltd.  Pilatus  PC-7  Service  Bulletin  No.  53-  006, dated
    November 17, 2008. Repetitively inspect thereafter at intervals not to
    exceed  every 5  years following  PILATUS Aircraft  Ltd. Pilatus  PC-7
    Maintenance Manual Chapter 05-10-20, page 4, dated November 30, 2008.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows:
No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Off-
    ice, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
    using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to  ATTN:
    Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
    Locust, Room 301,  Kansas City, Missouri  64106; telephone: (816)  329
    -4059; fax:  (816) 329-4090.  Before using  any approved  AMOC on  any
    airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate  principal
    inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),  or
    lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, und-
    er the provisions  of the Paperwork  Reduction Act (44  U.S.C. 3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer to  MCAI FOCA AD  HB-2009-004, dated  May 12, 2009; PILATUS Air-
    craft Ltd. Pilatus  PC-7 Service Bulletin  No. 53-006, dated  November
    17, 2008; and Pilatus  PC-7 Maintenance Manual Chapter  05-10-20, page
    4, dated November 30, 2008, for related information.

Issued in Kansas City,  Missouri, on May 29,  2009. Scott A. Horn,  Acting
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 6, 2009.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2009-0509;  Directorate  Identifier  2009-CE-029-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Model PC-7 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of  Transportat-
ion (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to reported corrosion on
the bolts  and in  the bores  of the  attachment fittings  for the  engine
mounting frame. The corrosion is caused by damaged cadmium plating of  the
bolts or damaged surface finish of the attachment fitting.

Such a condition, if left  uncorrected, could lead to crack  initiation at
the bolt  and the  fitting bore  and subsequently  to the  failure of  the
engine attachment fitting.

The proposed  AD would  require actions  that are  intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 6, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You may examine the AD docket on the  Internet at  http://www.regulations.
gov; or in person at the  Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m.  and 5
p.m.,  Monday  through  Friday, except  Federal  holidays.  The AD  docket
contains  this  proposed  AD,  the  regulatory  evaluation,  any  comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket  Office
(telephone (800) 647-5527) is in  the ADDRESSES section. Comments will  be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER  INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph,  Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate,  901 Locust, Room  301, Kansas City,  Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed under   the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2009-0509;   Directorate
Identifier  2009-CE-029-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The  Federal  Office  of  Civil Aviation  (FOCA),  which  is  the aviation
authority for Switzerland, has issued  FOCA AD HB-2009-004, dated May  12,
2009  (referred  to  after  this as  "the  MCAI"),  to  correct an  unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to reported corrosion on
the bolts  and in  the bores  of the  attachment fittings  for the  engine
mounting frame. The corrosion is caused by damaged cadmium plating of  the
bolts or damaged surface finish of the attachment fitting.

Such a condition, if left  uncorrected, could lead to crack  initiation at
the bolt  and the  fitting bore  and subsequently  to the  failure of  the
engine attachment fitting.

In order to correct and control  the situation, this AD requires a  visual
inspection  of  the  relevant   bolts  and  fittings.  Additionally,   the
replacement of the bolts is required.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. has issued Pilatus PC-7 Service Bulletin No. 53-006,
dated November 17,  2008, and Pilatus  PC-7 Maintenance Manual  Chapter 05
-10-20, page  4, dated  November 30,  2008. The  actions described in this
service  information  are  intended   to  correct  the  unsafe   condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral  agreement with  this State  of Design  Authority, they have
notified us  of the  unsafe condition  described in  the MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all information and  determined the unsafe condition  exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate  that  this  proposed AD  will  affect  10  products of  U.S.
registry. We  also estimate  that it  would take  about 4.5 work-hours per
product to  comply with  the basic  requirements of  this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80  per work-hour. Required parts would  cost about
$300 per product.

Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD  on U.S.
operators to be $6,600, or $660 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition  that  is likely  to exist  or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Proc-
   edures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD: