preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD BOMBARDIER, INC. (FORMERLY CANADAIR): Docket No. FAA-2008-0522; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-041-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by June 9, 2008.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to  Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet  Series
    700, 701,  & 702)  airplanes, having  serial numbers  (SNs) 10004  and
    subsequent; and Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705)  airplanes
    and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional  Jet Series 900) airplanes,  having SN
    15002 and subsequent; certificated in any category.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24: Electrical Power.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

Following in-flight test deployments on CL-600-2B19 aircraft, several  Air
-Driven generators (ADGs) failed  to come on-line. Investigation  revealed
that, as a result  of a wiring anomaly  that had not been  detected during
ADG manufacture,  a short  circuit was  possible between  certain internal
wires and their metallic over-braided  shields, which could result in  the
ADG not providing power when deployed. This directive mandates checking of
the ADG and modification of the ADG internal wiring, if required. It  also
prohibits future installation of unmodified ADGs. The unsafe condition  is
that failure of the ADG could lead to loss of several functions  essential
for safe flight.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.

(1) For airplanes identified in Table 1 of this AD: Within 12 months after
    the  effective date  of this  AD, inspect  the  serial  number of  the
    installed ADG. A review of airplane maintenance records is  acceptable
    in lieu  of this  inspection if  the serial  number of  the ADG can be
    conclusively determined from that review.

              TABLE 1.--BOMBARDIER AIRPLANE IDENTIFICATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
             MODEL                            SERIAL NO.                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    CL-600-2C10 airplanes..........      10004 through 10265.
    CL-600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24          15002 through 15162.
    airplanes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

(i) If  the serial  number is  not listed  in paragraph  1.A of Bombardier
    Service Bulletin 670BA-24-015, Revision A, dated December 18, 2006, no
    further action is required by this AD.

(ii) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A of Bombardier Service
     Bulletin 670BA-24-015,  Revision A,  dated December  18, 2006, before
     further  flight,  inspect  the  ADG  identification  plate  and,   as
     applicable,   do   the   actions   of   paragraph   (f)(1)(ii)(A)  or
     (f)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.

(A) If  the identification  plate is  marked with  the symbol  "24- 2", no
    further action is required by this AD.

(B) If  the identification  plate is  not marked  with the  symbol "24-2",
    modify  the   ADG  wiring   in  accordance   with  the  Accomplishment
    Instructions of the service bulletin.

(2) For all  Model CL-600-2C10 airplanes  having SN 10004  and subsequent,
    and Model CL-600-2D15  and CL-600-2D24 airplanes  having SN 15002  and
    subsequent: As of the  effective date of this  AD, no ADG part  number
    604-90800-19  (761339E), having  SN 0101  through 0132,  0134  through
    0167, 0169 through  0358, 0360 through  0438, 0440 through  0456, 0458
    through 0467, 0469, 0471 through 0590, 0592 through 0597, 0599 through
    0745, 0747 through 1005, or 1400 through 1439, may be installed on any
    airplane, unless  the identification  plate of  the ADG  is identified
    with the symbol "24-2" (refer to Hamilton Sundstrand Service  Bulletin
    ERPS10AG-24-2 for further information).

(3) Actions  done before  the  effective  date  of  this AD  according  to
    Bombardier  Service  Bulletin  670BA-24-015, dated  May 17, 2004,  are
    considered acceptable  for compliance  with the  corresponding actions
    specified in  this AD,  provided the  ADG has  not been replaced since
    those actions were done.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 1: This  AD differs  from the  MCAI  and/or  service  information  as
follows: No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,  New York Air-
    craft Certification Office,  FAA, has the  authority to approve  AMOCs
    for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR  39.19.
    Send information to ATTN: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,  Systems
    and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft  Certification
    Office,  1600 Stewart  Avenue, Suite  410, Westbury,  New York  11590;
    telephone  (516)  228-7303;  fax (516)  794-  5531.  Before using  any
    approved AMOC on any airplane  to which the AMOC applies,  notify your
    appropriate  principal  inspector  (PI) in  the  FAA  Flight Standards
    District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement  in this  AD,
    under the  provisions of  the Paperwork  Reduction Act,  the Office of
    Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the information collection
    requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120- 0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer to Canadian  Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-10, dated  February
    5, 2008,  and Bombardier  Service Bulletin  670BA-24-015, Revision  A,
    dated December 18, 2006, for related information.

Issued in  Renton, Washington,  on April  25, 2008.  Ali Bahrami, Manager,
Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 9, 2008.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket  No.  FAA-2008-0522;  Directorate  Identifier  2008-NM-041-AD] RIN
2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Bombardier  Model  CL-600-2C10   (Regional   Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702) Airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet  Series
705) Airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)  Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Following in-flight test deployments on CL-600-2B19 aircraft, several  Air
-Driven generators (ADGs) failed  to come on-line. Investigation  revealed
that, as a result  of a wiring anomaly  that had not been  detected during
ADG manufacture,  a short  circuit was  possible between  certain internal
wires and their metallic over- braided shields, which could result in  the
ADG not providing power when deployed. * * *

The unsafe  condition is  that failure  of the  ADG could  lead to loss of
several functions essential for safe flight. The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 9, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal:  Go to http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West  Building Ground  Floor, Room  W12-40, 1200  New Jersey  Avenue  SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m., Monday through  Friday, except
Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office  between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The  AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any  comments
received,  and  other  information.  The  street  address  for  the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace  Engineer, Sys-
tems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office,  1600  Stewart  Avenue,  Suite  410,  Westbury,  New  York  11590;
telephone (516) 228-7303; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed under   the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2008-0522;   Directorate
Identifier  2008-NM-041-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
based on those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

Transport Canada Civil  Aviation (TCCA), which  is the aviation  authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-10,  dated
February 5, 2008  (referred to after  this as "the  MCAI"), to correct  an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

Following in-flight test deployments on CL-600-2B19 aircraft, several  Air
-Driven generators (ADGs) failed  to come on-line. Investigation  revealed
that, as a result  of a wiring anomaly  that had not been  detected during
ADG manufacture,  a short  circuit was  possible between  certain internal
wires and their metallic over-braided  shields, which could result in  the
ADG not providing power when deployed. This directive mandates checking of
the ADG and modification of the ADG internal wiring, if required. It  also
prohibits future installation of unmodified ADGs.

The unsafe  condition is  that failure  of the  ADG could  lead to loss of
several  functions  essential  for safe  flight.  You  may obtain  further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Bombardier has  issued Service  Bulletin 670BA-24-015,  Revision A,  dated
December 18, 2006. The actions  described in this service information  are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with the  State of Design Authority, we  have been
notified  of  the  unsafe  condition described  in  the  MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all  pertinent information  and determined  an unsafe  condition
exists and is  likely to exist  or develop on  other products of  the same
type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD  would
affect about 304 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 5 work hours per product to comply with the basic  requirements
of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work hour. Required
parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the service information lists
required parts costs that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that
there will be  no charge for  these costs. As  we do not  control warranty
coverage for affected  parties, some parties  may incur costs  higher than
estimated  here. Based  on these  figures, we  estimate the  cost of   the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $121,600, or $400 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is likely  to exist   or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is  not  a "significant  rule" under  the DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
   Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: