preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0493; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-028-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by June 2, 2008.

AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies to  Models PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350,  PC-6/350
    -H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2,
    PC-6/B2-H2,  PC-6/B2-H4,  PC-6/C-H2,  and  PC-6/C1-H2  airplanes,  all
    serial numbers, certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: These  airplanes may  also be  identified  as  Fairchild  Republic
Company  PC-6  airplanes,  Fairchild   Heli  Porter  PC-6  airplanes,   or
Fairchild-Hiller Corporation PC-6 airplanes.

SUBJECT

(d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing Gear.

REASON

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is  prompted due to a potential  problem
with the tail landing gear locking mechanism of PC-6 series aircraft.

Investigation, carried out after an incident report, determined that  both
screws of  the tail-wheel  locking mechanism  had ruptured,  rendering the
mechanism inoperative.

In order to  address this situation,  the present AD  requires you replace
the two bolts  of the tail-wheel  locking mechanism with  new ones, having
higher shear  strength, and  install a  warning placard  on the tail-wheel
mudguard.

The actions specified by this AD  are intended to prevent, on take-off  or
landing  runs,  possible  hazards  associated  with  loss  of  directional
control.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service after the effective date  of
    this AD or within the next 12 months after the effective date of  this
    AD, whichever occurs first:

(i) Replace  the screws  and nuts  that attach  the locking  plate to  the
    locking lever of  the tail-wheel locking  mechanism with steel  screws
    and  nuts  following  Pilatus  Aircraft  Ltd.  Pilatus  PC-6   Service
    Bulletin, 32-001, dated August 8, 2006.

(ii) Install  the  placard on  the tail-wheel  mudguard following  Pilatus
     Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin, 32-001, dated August  8,
     2006.

(2) As  of the  effective date  of this  AD do  not install  on any of the
    affected  airplanes  locking   lever  assemblies  part   number  (P/N)
    6403.0094.00 or P/N 114.45.06.077 or tail landing gear assemblies  P/N
    6403.0067.xx  or  P/N  114.45.06.050 unless  they  have  been modified
    following  the Accomplishment  Instructions of  Pilatus Aircraft  Ltd.
    Pilatus PC-6 Service Bulletin, 32-001, dated August 8, 2006.

NOTE 2: The letter  "x" in P/N 6403.0067.xx  stands for a numeral  varying
from 0 to 9.

FAA AD DIFFERENCES

NOTE 3: This  AD differs  from the  MCAI  and/or  service  information  as
follows: No differences.

OTHER FAA AD PROVISIONS

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Off-
    ice, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
    using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to  ATTN:
    Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
    Locust, Room 301,  Kansas City, Missouri  64106; telephone: (816)  329
    -4059; fax:  (816) 329-4090.  Before using  any approved  AMOC on  any
    airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate  principal
    inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),  or
    lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
    actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they
    are FAA-approved.  Corrective actions  are considered  FAA-approved if
    they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
    agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before  it
    is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement  in this  AD,
    under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
    seq.), the  Office of  Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the
    information  collection  requirements  and  has  assigned  OMB Control
    Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(h) Refer  to MCAI  European Aviation  Safety Agency  (EASA), AD  No. 2008
    -0070, dated April  15, 2008; and  Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.  Pilatus PC-6
    Service  Bulletin   32-001,  dated   August  8,   2006,  for   related
    information.

Issued in  Kansas City,  Missouri, on  April 24,  2008. James  E. Jackson,
Acting  Manager,  Small   Airplane  Directorate,  Aircraft   Certification
Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 2, 2008.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0493; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-028-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. PC-6 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of  Transportat-
ion (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory  continuing
airworthiness information  (MCAI) originated  by an  aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is  prompted due to a potential  problem
with the tail landing gear locking mechanism of PC-6 series aircraft.

Investigation, carried out after an incident report, determined that  both
screws of  the tail-wheel  locking mechanism  had ruptured,  rendering the
mechanism inoperative.

The proposed  AD would  require actions  that are  intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 2, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to  http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: (202) 493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET

You   may   examine   the   AD  docket   on   the   Internet   at  http://
www.regulations.gov;  or  in  person  at  the  Docket  Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket  contains this proposed  AD, the regulatory  evaluation, any
comments  received,  and other  information.  The street  address  for the
Docket  Office (telephone  (800) 647-5527)  is in  the ADDRESSES  section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug  Rudolph,  Aerospace  Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate,  901 Locust, Room  301, Kansas City,  Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed  under  the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2008-0493;   Directorate
Identifier  2008-CE-028-AD"  at  the   beginning  of  your  comments.   We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
because of those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The European Aviation Safety Agency  (EASA), which is the Technical  Agent
for the Member States  of the European Community,  has issued AD No.  2008
-0070, dated April  15, 2008 (referred  to after this  as "the MCAI"),  to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is  prompted due to a potential  problem
with the tail landing gear locking mechanism of PC-6 series aircraft.

Investigation, carried out after an incident report, determined that  both
screws of  the tail-wheel  locking mechanism  had ruptured,  rendering the
mechanism inoperative.

In order to  address this situation,  the present AD  requires you replace
the two bolts  of the tail-wheel  locking mechanism with  new ones, having
higher shear  strength, and  install a  warning placard  on the tail-wheel
mudguard.

The actions specified by this AD  are intended to prevent, on take-off  or
landing  runs,  possible  hazards  associated  with  loss  of  directional
control.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.  has issued Pilatus  PC-6 Service Bulletin  32- 001,
dated August 8,  2006. The actions  described in this  service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD

This  product  has been  approved  by the  aviation  authority of  another
country, and is approved for  operation in the United States.  Pursuant to
our bilateral  agreement with  this State  of Design  Authority, they have
notified us  of the  unsafe condition  described in  the MCAI  and service
information  referenced  above.  We  are  proposing  this  AD  because  we
evaluated all information and  determined the unsafe condition  exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS PROPOSED AD AND THE MCAI OR SERVICE INFORMATION

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance.  But we might have  found it necessary to  use
different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for  U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to
differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.

We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted
in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate  that  this  proposed AD  will  affect  50  products of  U.S.
registry.  We also  estimate that  it would  take about  3 work-hours  per
product to  comply with  the basic  requirements of  this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80  per work-hour. Required parts would  cost about
$120 per product.

Based on these figures,  we estimate the cost  of the proposed AD  on U.S.
operators to be $18,000, or $360 per product.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is likely  to exist   or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is  not  a "significant  rule" under  the DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
   Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply  with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: