preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD EUROCOPTER FRANCE: Docket No. FAA-2008-0430; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-42-AD.
COMMENTS DUE DATE

(a) We must receive comments by May 22, 2008.

OTHER AFFECTED ADS

(b) None.

APPLICABILITY

(c) This AD applies  to Models AS332C, L,  L1, and L2 helicopters,  with a
    hydraulic pump made by  Messier-Bugatti, part number C24160-X,  C24160
    -XXX, C241600XX, C241600XX-X, and C241600XX-XXX, with a serial  number
    without  the  suffix  letter  "V",  listed  in  paragraph  1.A.1.,  of
    Eurocopter  France Emergency  Alert Service  Bulletin 01.00.73,  dated
    August 23, 2007 (ASB) installed, certificated in any category.

NOTE: The letter  "V" is a  suffix marked after  the serial number  on the
pump's identification plate to signify  that the pump has been  determined
to conform to the approved design data.

REASON

(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is issued  following two  cases of  LH
hydraulic power system loss on  two AS332 helicopters. In both  cases, the
pilot received the "low level" hydraulic failure alarm. The investigations
conducted on the two helicopters revealed a hydraulic fluid leak from  the
hydraulic pump casing.

In both cases, incorrect position of the liner of the compensating  piston
had caused  the seals  to deteriorate.  This incorrect  positioning of the
liner  is due  to non-compliant  application of  the repair  process by  a
repair station.

Deterioration of hydraulic pumps causes:

--The loss  of the  RH and  LH hydraulic  power systems  in the event of a
  substantial  hydraulic fluid  leak from  both hydraulic  pumps during  a
  given flight.

--The  loss  of  the  hydraulic  system  concerned,  in  the  event  of  a
  substantial hydraulic fluid leak from only one pump.

ACTIONS AND COMPLIANCE

(e) Unless already done, do the following actions:

(1) Within 15 hours time-in-service  (TIS), determine the part number  and
    serial number of the installed hydraulic pumps. If the serial  numbers
    of both the hydraulic pumps are listed in paragraph 1.A.1. of the ASB,
    before  further flight,  replace at  least one  of the  pumps with  an
    airworthy pump with a serial number other than one listed in paragraph
    1.A.1. of the ASB  or one with a  serial number containing the  letter
    "V". Replace  the pump  by following  the Accomplishment Instructions,
    paragraph 2.B.  of the  ASB, except  this AD  does not  require you to
    return the hydraulic pump to the manufacturer.

(2) Within the  next 12  months,  replace  all remaining  hydraulic  pumps
    having  a serial  number listed  in  paragraph  1.A.1. of  the ASB  by
    following the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B. of the  ASB,
    except this AD does  not require you to  return the hydraulic pump  to
    the manufacturer.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE FAA AD AND THE MCAI

(f) We do  not require the  operator to return  the hydraulic pump  to the
    manufacturer nor do we  require any action on  non-installed hydraulic
    pumps. Also, we changed "flying hours" to "hours time- in-service."

SUBJECT

(g) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code: 2913 Hydraulic Pump.

OTHER INFORMATION

(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Safety Manage-
    ment Group, FAA, has  the authority to approve  AMOCs for this AD,  if
    requested,  using  the  procedures   found  in  14  CFR   39.19.  Send
    information to ATTN: Uday Garadi, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft
    Directorate, Regulations and Guidance  Group, Fort Worth, Texas  76193
    -0110, telephone (817) 222-5123, fax (817) 222-5961.

(2) Airworthy Product: Use only FAA-approved  corrective actions. Correct-
    ive actions are  considered FAA-approved if  they are approved  by the
    State of Design Authority (or  their delegated agent) if the  State of
    Design has an appropriate bilateral agreement with the United  States.
    You  are required  to assure  the product  is airworthy  before it  is
    returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For  any  reporting  requirement in  this  AD,
    under the  provisions of  the Paperwork  Reduction Act,  the Office of
    Management and  Budget (OMB)  has approved  the information collection
    requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

RELATED INFORMATION

(i) MCAI Airworthiness Directive No. F-2007-010, dated September 12, 2007,
    contains related information.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on  April 3, 2008. Mark R. Schilling,  Acting
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 22, 2008.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0430; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-42-AD] RIN  2120
-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Eurocopter France Model  AS332 C, L, L1, and  L2
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose  to adopt a  new airworthiness directive  (AD) for the
specified  Eurocopter France  (ECF) model  helicopters. This  proposed  AD
results  from  mandatory   continuing  airworthiness  information   (MCAI)
originated by  an aviation  authority of  another country  to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The aviation authority
of France, with which we have a bilateral agreement, states in the MCAI:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is issued  following two  cases of  LH
hydraulic power system loss on  two AS332 helicopters. In both  cases, the
pilot received the "low level" hydraulic failure alarm. The investigations
conducted on the two helicopters revealed a hydraulic fluid leak from  the
hydraulic pump casing.

In both cases, incorrect position of the liner of the compensating  piston
had caused  the seals  to deteriorate.  This incorrect  positioning of the
liner  is due  to non-compliant  application of  the repair  process by  a
repair station.

Deterioration of hydraulic pumps causes:

--The loss  of the  RH and  LH hydraulic  power systems  in the event of a
  substantial  hydraulic fluid  leak from  both hydraulic  pumps during  a
  given flight.

--The loss of the hydraulic system concerned, in the event of a  substant-
  ial hydraulic fluid leak from only one pump.

The proposed AD  would require actions  that are intended  to address this
unsafe condition.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 22, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal:  Go to http://www.regulations.gov.  Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S.  Department of  Transportation, Docket  Operations, M-30,  West
Building  Ground  Floor,  Room  W12-140,  1200  New  Jersey  Avenue,  SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building  Ground Floor,  Room W12-140,  1200 New  Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590,  between 9 a.m.  and 5 p.m.,  Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet  at
http://www.regulations.gov or  in person  at the  Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD  docket contains  this proposed  AD, the  economic evaluation,  any
comments  received,  and other  information.  The street  address  for the
Docket Operations office  (telephone (800) 647-5527)  is in the  ADDRESSES
section.  Comments  will  be  available in  the  AD  docket  shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Uday Garadi,  Aviation  Safety  Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations  and Guidance Group, Fort  Worth,
Texas 76193-0110, telephone (817) 222-5123, fax (817) 222-5961.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

STREAMLINED ISSUANCE OF AD

The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance of ADs
related to  MCAI. This  streamlined process  will allow  us to  adopt MCAI
safety requirements  in a  more efficient  manner and  will reduce  safety
risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD  issuance
processes  to  meet  legal, economic,  Administrative  Procedure  Act, and
Federal  Register requirements.  We also  continue to  meet our  technical
decisionmaking responsibilities to identify and correct unsafe  conditions
on U.S.-certificated products.

This proposed AD references the MCAI and related service information  that
we  considered in  forming the  engineering basis  to correct  the  unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain language principles.

COMMENTS INVITED

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about
this  proposed AD.  Send your  comments to  an address  listed under   the
ADDRESSES  section.   Include  "Docket   No.  FAA-2008-0430;   Directorate
Identifier  2007-SW-42-AD"   at  the   beginning  of   your  comments.  We
specifically  invite  comments   on  the  overall   regulatory,  economic,
environmental, and energy  aspects of this  proposed AD. We  will consider
all comments received by the closing  date and may amend this proposed  AD
based on those comments.

We  will  post  all  comments  we  receive,  without  change,  to  http://
www.regulations.gov, including  any personal  information you  provide. We
will also  post a  report summarizing  each substantive  verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

DISCUSSION

The Direction Generale de L'Aviation Civile (DGAC), the aviation authority
for  France, has  issued French  Airworthiness Directive  No.  F-2007-010,
dated  September 12,  2007 (referred  to after  this as  "the MCAI"),   to
correct an unsafe condition for this French-certificated product. The MCAI
states:

This Airworthiness  Directive (AD)  is issued  following two  cases of  LH
hydraulic power system loss on  two AS332 helicopters. In both  cases, the
pilot received the "low level" hydraulic failure alarm. The investigations
conducted on the two helicopters revealed a hydraulic fluid leak from  the
hydraulic pump casing.

In both cases, incorrect position of the liner of the compensating  piston
had caused  the seals  to deteriorate.  This incorrect  positioning of the
liner  is due  to non-compliant  application of  the repair  process by  a
repair station.

Deterioration of hydraulic pumps causes:

--The loss  of the  RH and  LH hydraulic  power systems  in the event of a
  substantial  hydraulic fluid  leak from  both hydraulic  pumps during  a
  given flight.

--The  loss  of  the  hydraulic  system  concerned,  in  the  event  of  a
  substantial hydraulic fluid leak from only one pump.

You  may obtain  further information  by examining  the MCAI  and  service
information in the AD docket.

RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION

Eurocopter France has  issued Alert Service  Bulletin No. 01.00.73,  dated
August 23, 2007 (ASB). The actions  described in the MCAI are intended  to
correct the same unsafe condition as that identified in the ASB.

FAA'S DETERMINATION AND PROPOSED REQUIREMENTS

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of France and  is
approved for  operation in  the United  States. Pursuant  to our bilateral
agreement with this  State of Design  Authority, we have  been notified of
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information. We are
proposing  this  AD because  we  evaluated all  pertinent  information and
determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on
other products of the same type design.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THIS AD AND THE MCAI

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance. However, we have made the following changes:

We  do  not require  the  operator to  return  the hydraulic  pump  to the
manufacturer nor any action on non-installed hydraulic pumps.

We changed "flying hours" to "hours time-in-service."

In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the
information provided in the MCAI. These differences are highlighted in the
"Differences Between the FAA and the MCAI" section in the proposed AD.

COSTS OF COMPLIANCE

We  estimate that  this proposed  AD would  affect 4  helicopters of  U.S.
registry. We also  estimate that it  would take 2.5  work-hours to inspect
and replace one  hydraulic pump. The  average labor rate  is $80 per  work
-hour. Each pump would cost about $26,000 and require two hydraulic  pumps
per  helicopter. Based  on these  figures, we  estimate the  cost of   the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $209,600 to replace all the  hydraulic
pumps on the U.S. fleet.

AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to  issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs," describes  in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in  "Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements." Under that
section, Congress  charges the  FAA with  promoting safe  flight of  civil
aircraft  in  air  commerce  by  prescribing  regulations  for  practices,
methods, and procedures  the Administrator finds  necessary for safety  in
air  commerce.  This regulation  is  within the  scope  of that  authority
because  it addresses  an unsafe  condition that  is likely  to exist   or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

REGULATORY FINDINGS

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect  on the  States, on  the relationship  between the  national
Government  and  the  States,  or   on  the  distribution  of  power   and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is  not  a "significant  rule" under  the DOT  Regulatory Policies  and
   Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
   substantial  number  of  small  entities  under  the  criteria  of  the
   Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared an economic evaluation  of the estimated costs to  comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]

2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD: