DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0353; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-101-AD] RIN
2120-AA64
AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model 390 Air-
planes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportat-
ion (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model 390 airplanes. This proposed
AD would require you to repetitively do a post-flight check
(owner/operator holding at least a private pilot certificate checking for
residual heat in the angle-of-attack (AOA) probes or an appropriately
-rated mechanic doing a maintenance manual operational test of the heat of
the AOA probes) after every flight and replace or modify (upload software)
the stall warning AOA transmitters. This proposed AD results from reports
of the potential for unannunciated loss of the heating function in the
left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) stall warning AOA transmitters of Model
390 airplanes. We are proposing this AD to correct potentially inadequate
stall warning with loss of stick pusher function.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 27, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this proposed
AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation, 9709 East Central, Wichita, Kansas 67291;
telephone: (800) 429-5372 or (316) 676-3140.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Wichita,
Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4139; fax: (316) 946-4107.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
COMMENTS INVITED
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, "FAA-2008-0353;
Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-101-AD" at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in
light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.
DISCUSSION
We have received reports of the potential for unannunciated loss of the
heating function in the LH/RH stall warning AOA transmitters of Model 390
airplanes. The current AOA transmitter software may not always annunciate
certain failure modes of the probe or case heating circuits.
This condition, if not corrected, could result in potentially inadequate
stall warning with loss of stick pusher function.
RELEVANT SERVICE INFORMATION
We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin No. SB 27
-3787, issued: May 2007; and Raytheon Aircraft Company Temporary Change to
the FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual P/N 390-590001-0003CTC7, issued:
March 15, 2007. The service information describes procedures for the
replacement/modification of the stall warning AOA transmitters. The
airplane flight manual (AFM) describes procedures for doing a post-flight
check. This post-flight check can be either the pilot checking for
residual heat in the AOA probes as part of the shutdown procedure or,
alternatively, having the AOA probe heat operational test maintenance
manual procedure done by an appropriately-rated mechanic.
FAA'S DETERMINATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD would
require a repetitive post-flight check for residual heat in the AOA probes
or a maintenance manual operational test of the heat of the AOA probes
after every flight and replace or modify (upload software) the stall
warning AOA transmitters. Replacement or modification (upload software) of
the stall warning AOA transmitters terminates the repetitive requirement
to do the post-flight action.
COSTS OF COMPLIANCE
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 152 airplanes in the U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to incorporate and remove the temporary
change to the AFM.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST PER
LABOR COST PARTS COST AIRPLANE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 work-hour x $80 per hour = Not Applicable...... $40
$40.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate that the proposed post-flight residual heat check requires
about 3 minutes to do. We estimate the following costs to do 10 of the
proposed post-flight residual heat checks. We have no way of determining
the number of airplanes that would have this post-flight residual heat
check, or how many times this will need to be performed before the
terminating action is done:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LABOR COST TO DO 10 POST-FLIGHT TOTAL COST PER
RESIDUAL HEAT CHECKS PARTS COST AIRPLANE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 work-hour x $80 per hour = Not Applicable...... $40
$40.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do the proposed maintenance manual
operational test of the heat of the AOA probes. We have no way of
determining the number of airplanes that would have this operational test,
or how many times this will need to be performed before the terminating
action is done:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST PER
LABOR COST PARTS COST AIRPLANE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.5 work-hour x $80 per hour = Not Applicable...... $40
$40.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any proposed upload of software to
the AOA transmitters. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that would have this modification:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST PER
LABOR COST PARTS COST AIRPLANE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $80 per hour = Not Applicable...... $320
$320.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any proposed replacement of 2 stall
warning AOA transmitters. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that would have this replacement:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL COST PER
LABOR COST PARTS COST AIRPLANE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $80 per hour = $160.... $18,600 $18,760
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
AUTHORITY FOR THIS RULEMAKING
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority
of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in
more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, "General requirements." Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
REGULATORY FINDINGS
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have
a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
EXAMINING THE AD DOCKET
You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
SEC. 39.13 [AMENDED]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD: