preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.com
PROPOSED AD CARSON HELICOPTERS, INC.; CROMAN CORPORATION; SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION; AND SILLER HELICOPTERS: Docket No. FAA-2006-26107; Project Identifier 2004-SW-30-AD.
(a) COMMENTS DUE DATE

    The FAA must receive comments by April 29, 2021.

(b) AFFECTED AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES (ADS)

    None.

(c) APPLICABILITY

    This AD  applies to  all helicopters  identified in  paragraphs (c)(1)
    through  (6)  of  this  AD,  certificated  in  any  category including
    restricted.

(1) Carson Helicopters, Inc., Model S-61L helicopters.

(2) Carson Helicopters, Inc., Model SH-3H helicopters.

(3) Croman Corporation Model SH-3H helicopters.

(4) Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-61A, S-61D, S-61E and S-61V hel-
    icopters.

(5) Siller Helicopters Model CH-3E helicopters.

(6) Siller Helicopters Model SH-3A helicopters.

(d) SUBJECT

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 6310,  Engine/Transmission
    Coupling.

(e) UNSAFE CONDITION

    This AD was prompted  by an accident in which the left and right input
    freewheel unit (IFWU) assembly on a helicopter slipped or  disengaged,
    resulting in both engines overspeeding, engine shutdowns, and loss  of
    engine  power to  the transmissions.  The FAA  is issuing  this AD  to
    address slipping  of the  main gearbox  IFWU assembly,  loss of engine
    power, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(f) COMPLIANCE

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,  unless al-
    ready done.

(g) CREATION OF HISTORY CARD OR EQUIVALENT AND DAILY ACTIONS

    Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of this
    AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.

(1) Create an external lift component history card  or  equivalent  record
    for  each IFWU  assembly,  part  number (P/N)  61074-35000-041 through
    61074-35000-063 inclusive.

(2) Count and,  at the end of each day's operations,  record the number of
    external lift  cycles (lift  cycles) performed  and the  hours TIS for
    each  IFWU  assembly,  P/N  61074-35000-041  through   61074-35000-063
    inclusive. A  "lift cycle"  is defined  as the  lifting of an external
    load and subsequent  release of the  load. Record the  lift cycles and
    hours TIS on  the external lift  component history card  or equivalent
    record.

(h) DETERMINATION OF IFWU ASSEMBLY TYPE AND CALCULATIONS

(1) Upon reaching 250 hours TIS  after  the  effective date  of this AD on
    each  IFWU  assembly,  P/N  61074-35000-041  through   61074-35000-063
    inclusive,  determine  whether  the  IFWU  assembly  is  a  repetitive
    external lift (REL) or non-REL  IFWU assembly by using a  250-hour TIS
    moving average. To perform the calculation, divide the total number of
    lift  cycles performed  during the  first 250  hours TIS  by 250.  The
    result will be the first moving average calculation of lift cycles per
    hour TIS.

(i) If the calculation specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD results in
    more than 6 lift cycles per hour TIS, the IFWU assembly is an REL IFWU
    assembly.

(ii) If the calculation specified in paragraph (h)(1)  of  this AD results
     in 6 or less lift cycles per hour TIS, the IFWU assembly is a Non-REL
     IFWU assembly.

(2) For each IFWU assembly  determined to be a Non-REL IFWU assembly based
    on the first calculation of  the 250-hour TIS moving average  for lift
    cycles specified in paragraph (h)(1)  of this AD: Within 50  hours TIS
    after the determination, and thereafter at intervals of 50 hours  TIS,
    recalculate the average lift cycles per hour TIS to determine  whether
    the IFWU assembly is an REL  or non-REL IFWU assembly. To perform  the
    calculation, subtract the total number of lift cycles performed during
    the first  50-hour TIS  interval used  in the  previous moving average
    calculation from the total number of lift cycles performed on the IFWU
    assembly during the previous 300 hours TIS. Divide this result by 250.
    The result will be the  next or subsequent moving average  calculation
    of lift cycles per hour TIS.

(i) If any calculation specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD results in
    more than 6 lift cycles per hour TIS, the IFWU assembly is an REL IFWU
    assembly.

(ii) If any calculation  specified in paragraph (h)(2)  of this AD results
     in 6 or less lift cycles per hour TIS, the IFWU assembly is a Non-REL
     IFWU assembly.

Note 1 to paragraph (h)(2):  Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation  All  Operators
Letter (AOL) CCS-61-AOL-04-0005,  dated May 18, 2004,  provides an example
and additional information about tracking cycles  and  the  moving average
procedure.

Note 2 to paragraph (h)(2): The following is a sample calculation for sub-
sequent 50 hour TIS intervals.  Assume the total number of lift cycles for
the first 50 hour TIS interval used  in the previous moving average calcu-
lation = 450 lift cycles and the total number of lift cycles  for the pre-
vious 300 hours TIS = 2,700 lift cycles.  The subsequent moving average of
lift cycles per hour TIS = (2,700-450) divided by  250 = 9 lift cycles per
hour TIS.

(3) Once an IFWU assembly is determined to be an REL IFWU assembly, it re-
    mains an REL IFWU assembly  for  the  rest  of its service life and is
    subject to the inspection  for REL IFWU assemblies required  by  para-
    graph (i) of this AD.

(4) Once an IFWU assembly is determined to be an REL IFWU assembly, you no
    longer need  to perform  the 250-hour  TIS moving  average calculation
    required by  paragraph (h)(2)  of this  AD, but  you must  continue to
    count and record  the lift cycles  as required by  paragraph (g)(2) of
    this AD.

(i) REPETITIVE INSPECTIONS OF REL IFWU ASSEMBLIES AND REPLACEMENT

    For each REL IFWU assembly,  as determined  by paragraph (h)(1) or (2)
    of this AD:

(1) Within 500 hours TIS  or  7,500 lift cycles,  whichever  occurs  first
    since  the assembly  was determined  to be  a REL  IFWU assembly,  and
    thereafter at  intervals not  to exceed  500 hours  TIS or  7,500 lift
    cycles, whichever  occurs first,  inspect for  wear, surface distress,
    and  endplay  by  following  paragraphs  B.(1)  through  B.(6)  of the
    Accomplishment  Instructions  of Sikorsky  Aircraft  Corporation Alert
    Service Bulletin 61B35-67B, Revision B, dated August 11, 2003.  Record
    all the information specified in  Figures 1 through 3 of  the Sikorsky
    Aircraft  Corporation Alert  Service Bulletin  61B35-67B, Revision  B,
    dated August 11, 2003. You may record this information on any suitable
    maintenance  record,  or you  may  use the  Sikorsky  evaluation forms
    provided  in  Sikorsky  Aircraft  Corporation  Alert  Service Bulletin
    61B35-67B, Revision B, dated August 11, 2003. This AD does not require
    you to contact Sikorsky or provide information to Sikorsky.

(2) If during any inspection required by paragraph (i)(1)  of this AD, any
    IFWU assembly part  is found whose  average wear, wear  marks, surface
    distress, or endplay exceeds the limits specified in paragraphs  B.(1)
    through B.(6) of the Accomplishment Instructions of Sikorsky  Aircraft
    Corporation Alert Service Bulletin 61B35-67B, Revision B, dated August
    11, 2003,  before further  flight, replace  the affected  part with an
    airworthy IFWU assembly part.

Note 3 to paragraph (i)(2):  Sikorsky Aircraft  S-61L/N  Overhaul  Manual,
SA4045-83, Revision 20, dated August 15, 2003,  as  revised  by  Temporary
Revisions 65-193, -194, -195, and -196,  contains  the overhaul procedures
for the IFWU assembly.

(j) PART MARKING

    For each REL IFWU assembly,  as determined by paragraph (h)(1)  or (2)
    of this AD: Before further flight after the assembly was determined to
    be an REL  IFWU assembly, permanently  mark IFWU camshafts,  P/N 61350
    -24052,  61350-24072,  S6135-20611, S6135-20614  and  S6137-23075, and
    IFWU  gear housings,  P/N 61350-24051,  61350-24068, S6135-20695,  and
    S6137-23057, with the  letters "REL". Mark  the camshafts by  applying
    etching ink on the  surface of the part  that is 0.5-inch square  with
    the depth  of the  letters not  to exceed  0.001 inch.  Before further
    flight and  after etching,  neutralize the  etched surface  and oil to
    prevent corrosion.

(k) ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF COMPLIANCE (AMOCS)

(1) The Manager, Strategic Policy Rotorcraft Section, FAA, has the author-
    ity to approve  AMOCs for this  AD, if requested  using the procedures
    found in  14 CFR  39.19. In  accordance with  14 CFR  39.19, send your
    request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
    Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager
    of  the  Strategic Policy  Rotorcraft  Section, send  it  to: Manager,
    Strategic Policy Rotorcraft Section,  FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,  Fort
    Worth, TX  76177; telephone  817-222-5110. Information  may be emailed
    to: 9-ASW-FTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.

(2) Before using any approved AMOC,  notify your appropriate principal in-
    spector, or lacking  a principal inspector,  the manager of  the local
    flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.

(l) RELATED INFORMATION

(1) For more information about this AD,  contact Isabel Saltzman, Aviation
    Safety Engineer, Boston ACO Branch,  FAA,  1200 District Avenue,  Bur-
    lington, MA 01803; telephone 781-238-7649; email Isabel.L.Saltzman@faa
    .gov.

(2) For service information  identified  in this AD,  contact  your  local
    Sikorsky Field Representative  or Sikorsky's Service Engineering Group
    at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 124 Quarry Road, Trumbull, CT 06611;
    telephone 1-800-Winged-S;  email wcs_cust_service_eng.gr-sik@lmco.com.
    Operators may also log on to the Sikorsky 360 website  at https://www.
    sikorsky360.com.  You may view this service information  at  the  FAA,
    Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy,
    Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability
    of this material at the FAA, call 817-222-5110.

Issued on March 8, 2021. Ross Landes, Deputy Director for Regulatory Oper-
ations, Compliance & Airworthiness Division,  Aircraft Certification Serv-
ice.

DATES: The comment period  for the NPRM  published in the Federal Register
on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63272), is reopened.  The FAA must receive com-
ments on this SNPRM by April 29, 2021.
PREAMBLE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2006-26107; Project Identifier 2004-SW-30-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Carson Helicopters, Inc.; Croman
Corporation; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation; and Siller Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening
of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is revising an earlier proposal for all Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation Model S-61 A, D, E, and V helicopters; Croman
Corporation Model SH-3H helicopters, Carson Helicopters, Inc. Model S-
61L helicopters; and Siller Helicopters Model CH-3E and SH-3A
helicopters. This action revises the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) by adding camshaft and gear housing part numbers that need to be
marked and clarifying the applicability and certain compliance times.
The FAA is proposing this airworthiness directive (AD) to address the
unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions would impose an
additional burden over that in the NPRM, the FAA is reopening the
comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these
changes.

DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal
Register on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63272), is reopened.

The FAA must receive comments on this SNPRM by April 29, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.

Fax: 202-493-2251.

Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact your
local Sikorsky Field Representative or Sikorsky's Service Engineering
Group at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 124 Quarry Road, Trumbull, CT
06611; telephone 1-800-Winged-S; email wcs_cust_service_eng.gr-sik@lmco
.com. Operators may also log on to the Sikorsky 360 website at
https://www.sikorsky360.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call 817-222-5110.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.
gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2006-26107;
or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this SNPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Isabel Saltzman, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803; telephone 781-238-7649; email Isabel.L.Saltzman@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No. FAA-2006-26107; Project
Identifier 2004-SW-30-AD" at the beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The
FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend this proposal because of those comments.

Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.

Confidential Business Information

CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this SNPRM contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the
submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as "PROPIN." The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this SNPRM. Submissions containing CBI should
be sent to Isabel Saltzman, Aviation Safety Engineer, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone 781-
238-7649; email Isabel.L.Saltzman@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.

Discussion

The FAA issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to all Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-61 A, D, E,
and V helicopters; Croman Corporation Model SH-3H helicopters, Carson
Helicopters, Inc. Model S-61L helicopters; and Siller Helicopters Model
CH-3E and SH-3A helicopters. The NPRM published in the Federal Register
on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63272). The NPRM proposed to require
creating a component history card or equivalent record and recording
the hours time-in-service (TIS) and the external lift cycles (lift
cycles) for each affected main gearbox input left and right freewheel
unit (IFWU) assembly. The NPRM also proposed to require determining if
the IFWU assembly is a repetitive external lift (REL) or non-REL IFWU
assembly. The determination includes calculating a moving average of
lift cycles per hour TIS at specified intervals on each IFWU assembly.
For REL IFWU assemblies, the NPRM proposed to require repetitive
inspections, which include visual and dimensional inspections, of the
IFWU assembly for wear, surface distress, and endplay, recording
certain information, and replacing affected parts with an airworthy
part. In addition, the NPRM proposed to require permanently marking the
REL IFWU camshafts and gear housings with the letters "REL" on the
surface of these parts.

The NPRM was prompted by an accident in which the left and right
IFWU assembly on a helicopter slipped or disengaged, resulting in both
engines overspeeding, engine shutdowns, and loss of engine power to the
transmissions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address slipping of the
main gearbox IFWU assembly, loss of engine power, and subsequent loss
of control of the helicopter.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the FAA determined that additional
camshaft and gear housing part numbers need to be marked and the
applicability and certain compliance times need clarification.

Comments

The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this proposed AD. The FAA has considered the comments
received.

Request To Fix Typographical Errors

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) requested that the FAA fix
two typographical errors. Sikorsky stated that in the third paragraph
of the Discussion section in the NPRM, the citation for the alert
service bulletin should read ". . . 61B35-67B . . ." (not "61835-
67B"), and the citation for the all operators letter should read ". .
. CCS-61-AOL-04-0005" (not "CCS-61AOL-04-0005").

The FAA agrees with the request. The FAA has revised the citations
accordingly.

Request To Revise Etching Language

Sikorsky requested that the etching language in paragraph (d) of
the proposed AD (in the NPRM) (referred to as paragraph (j) of this
proposed AD (in the SNPRM)) be revised from "After etching neutralize
the etched surface with oil to prevent corrosion" to the following:
"After etching, neutralize the etched surface and oil to prevent
corrosion."

The FAA agrees with the request. The FAA has also clarified the
compliance time by specifying "Before further flight and after
etching, neutralize the etched surface and oil to prevent corrosion"
in paragraph (j) of this proposed AD.

Request To Add Camshaft and Gear Housing Part Numbers

Sikorsky requested that the FAA add camshaft and gear housing part
numbers to the "Compliance" section of the proposed AD. Sikorsky
stated that additional IFWU camshaft part numbers 61350-24052 and
61350-24072 have been delivered in military versions of the S-61 and
should be included on the assumption that some of these aircraft have
been or may become certificated. Sikorsky also stated that additional
IFWU gear housing part numbers 61350-24051 and 61350-24068 have been
delivered in military versions of the S-61 and should be included on
the assumption that some of these aircraft have been or may become
certificated.

The FAA agrees. Paragraph (j) of this proposed AD has been revised
accordingly.

Request To Require Installation of Redesigned IFWUs

Croman Corporation stated a redesigned #2 IFWU could be installed
in the commercial gear box with minimal modifications, mostly to the
oil system. The FAA infers that the commenter is requesting that the
proposed AD require installing redesigned #2 IFWUs in lieu of
accomplishing the proposed actions (i.e., creating a component history
card or equivalent record and recording the hours TIS and the lift
cycles for each affected main gearbox IFWU assembly; determining if the
IFWU assembly is a REL or non-REL assembly; for REL IFWU assemblies,
repetitive inspections of the IFWU assembly for wear, surface distress,
and endplay, recording certain information, and replacing affected
parts; and permanently marking the REL IFWU camshafts and gear
housings).

The FAA does not concur. The FAA has determined that the proposed
actions adequately address the identified unsafe condition. However,
the FAA might consider additional rulemaking if sufficient data is
submitted to substantiate requiring the replacement of the IFWUs in
lieu of doing the proposed actions.

Clarification of the Model Designations

The applicability of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) refers to Model
S-61 A, D, E, V, SH-3H, S-61L; CH-3E, and SH-3A helicopters. The FAA
has revised the applicability of this proposed AD (in the SNPRM) to
refer to the model designations as specified in the most recent U.S.
type certificate data sheet: Carson Helicopters, Inc., Model S-61L
helicopters; Carson Helicopters, Inc., Model SH-3H helicopters; Croman
Corporation Model SH-3H helicopters; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Model S-61A, S-61D, S-61E, and S-61V helicopters; Siller Helicopters
Model CH-3E helicopters; and Siller Helicopters Model SH-3A
helicopters.

Clarification of Certain Compliance Times

The FAA has clarified the compliance times specified in paragraphs
(g), (h)(1), (i)(1), and (j) of this proposed AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

The FAA reviewed Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Alert Service
Bulletin 61B35-67B, Revision B, dated August 11, 2003. This service
information describes, among other actions, procedures for inspections,
which includes visual and dimensional inspections, of the IFWU assembly
for wear, surface distress, and endplay, and for recording certain
information. This service information is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

The FAA also reviewed Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation All Operators
Letter (AOL) CCS-61-AOL-04-0005, dated May 18, 2004. This service
information provides an example and additional information about
tracking cycles and the moving average procedure.

The FAA also reviewed Sikorsky Aircraft S-61L/N Overhaul Manual,
SA4045-83, Revision 20, dated August 15, 2003, as revised by Temporary
Revisions 65-193, -194, -195, and -196, which contains the overhaul
procedures for the IFWU assembly.

FAA's Determination

The FAA is proposing this AD because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the
NPRM. As a result, the FAA has determined that it is necessary to
reopen the comment period to provide additional opportunity for the
public to comment on this SNPRM.

Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM

This SNPRM would require creating a component history card or
equivalent record and recording the hours TIS and the lift cycles for
each affected main gearbox IFWU assembly; determining if the IFWU
assembly is a REL or non-REL assembly; for REL IFWU assemblies,
repetitive inspections of the IFWU assembly for wear, surface distress,
and endplay, recording certain information, and replacing affected
parts; and permanently marking the REL IFWU camshafts and gear
housings.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

The effectivity of Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Alert Service
Bulletin 61B35-67B, Revision B, dated August 11, 2003, includes Model
S-61 L, N, NM, and R helicopters. However, for those helicopters, the
unsafe condition is addressed in AD 2007-01-05, Amendment 39-14876 (72
FR 1139, January 10, 2007). Therefore, those helicopters are not
included in the applicability of this proposed AD.

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Alert Service Bulletin 61B35-67B,
Revision B, dated August 11, 2003, specifies contacting Sikorsky and
providing information to Sikorsky. This proposed AD does not require
you to contact Sikorsky or provide information to Sikorsky.

Costs of Compliance

The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 55 helicopters of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

Estimated Costs

Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
Creating history card; determining type of IFWU assembly; inspecting IFWU assemblies; recording information; replacing parts; and marking certain parts. Up to 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $680
Up to $1,975
Up to $2,655
Up to $146,025

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:

(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive
Order 12866,

(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):