preamble attached >>>
ADs updated daily at www.Tdata.aero
PROPOSED AD ARROW FALCON EXPORTERS, INC. (previously UTAH STATE UNIVERSITy); FIREFLY AVIATION HELICOPTER SERVICES (previously ERICKSON AIR-CRANE CO.); GARLICK HELICOPTERS, INC.; GLOBAL HELICOPTER TECHNOLOGY, INC.; HAGGLUND HELICOPTERS, LLC (previously WESTERN INTERNATIONAL AVIATION, INC.); HAWKINS AND POWERS AVIATION, INC.; INTERNATIONAL HELICOPTERS, INC.; ROBINSON AIR CRANE, INC.; SAN JOAQUIN HELICOPTERS (previously HAWKINS AND POWERS AVIATION, INC.); S.M.&T. AIRCRAFT (previously U.S. HELICOPTERS, INC.); SMITH HELICOPTERS; SOUTHERN HELICOPTER, INC.; SOUTHWEST FLORIDA AVIATION; TAMARACK HELICOPTERS, INC. (previously RANGER HELICOPTER SERVICES, INC.); U.S. HELICOPTER, INC.; and WILLIAMS HELICOPTER CORPORATION (previously SCOTT PAPER CO.): Docket No. 2002-SW-31-AD. Supersedes AD 83-03-03, Amendment 39-4556, Docket No. 82-ASW-54.
APPLICABILITY:    Model  HH-1K, TH-1F,  TH-1L, UH-1A, UH-1B, UH-1E,  UH-1F,
UH-1H,  UH-1L,  and  UH-1P;  and  Southwest  Florida  Aviation  Model SW204,
SW204HP, SW205, and SW205A-1 helicopters, manufactured by Bell  Helicopter
Textron,  Inc.  (BHTI)  for  the  Armed  Forces  of  the  United   States,
certificated in any category.

NOTE 1:  This AD  applies to  each helicopter  identified in the preceding
applicability  provision,  regardless  of whether  it  has  been otherwise
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements  of
this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, altered, or repaired  so
that  the performance  of the  requirements of  this AD  is affected,  the
owner/operator  must  request  approval  for  an  alternative  method   of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should
include an assessment  of the effect  of the modification,  alteration, or
repair on the  unsafe condition addressed  by this AD;  and if the  unsafe
condition has  not been  eliminated, the  request should  include specific
proposed actions to address it.

COMPLIANCE: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To detect a crack in the  skin of a tailboom assembly, tail  rotor gearbox
support fitting, or  vertical fin spar,  which could cause  failure of the
tailboom and loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:

(a) Within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS), and thereafter at intervals not
    to exceed 100 hours TIS:

(1) Visually inspect the tailboom assembly skin joint at Boom Station (BS)
    194 for  fretting, corrosion,  loose or  working rivets,  or a  crack.
    Inspect 10 inches  forward and 10  inches aft of  BS 194 (BS  194 skin
    joint area)  as shown in the following Figure 1:

                ILLUSTRATION (Figure 1)


NOTE 2: The tailboom skin joint at BS 194 is located at the bulkhead  just
forward  of  the attachment  area  for the  42-degree  tail rotor  gearbox
assembly (42-degree gearbox) and the intersection between the vertical fin
forward canted bulkhead and the lower tailboom skin.

(2) Visually inspect the vertical fin forward spar caps (2) for a crack at
    the  intersection  with  the  tail  rotor  gearbox  support  fitting.
    Refer to Figure 1 of this AD.

(b) Before further flight, and  thereafter at intervals not to  exceed 500
    hours   TIS,  radiographically   inspect  the   BS  194   skin  joint
    area in accordance  with  the requirements   of ASTM  E  1742-00,  MIL
    -STD-  453C,  or  another FAA-accepted  equivalent, for  any tailboom
    assembly with:

(1) Any fretting, corrosion, loose or working rivets, or a crack
    in the BS 194 skin joint area; or

(2) 1,000 or more hours TIS.

(c) If a  crack is found  in any part,  replace it with  an airworthy part
    before  further flight.  Repair any   corrosion or  other damage  that
    exceeds the   limitations in   the maintenance   or overhaul   manuals
    before  further flight.

(d) An alternative  method of compliance  or adjustment of  the compliance
    time  that provides  an acceptable  level  of  safety may  be used  if
    approved by the Manager,  Rotorcraft Certification Office,  Rotorcraft
    Directorate, FAA.  Operators   shall  submit their   requests  through
    an FAA  Principal  Maintenance Inspector, who  may concur or   comment
    and then send it to  the Manager, Rotorcraft Certification Office.

NOTE 3:  Information  concerning  the  existence  of  approved alternative
methods of  compliance with  this AD,  if any,  may be  obtained from  the
Rotorcraft Certification Office.

(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR  21.197
    and  21.199  to  operate  the  helicopter  to  a  location  where  the
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Issued  in  Fort Worth,  Texas,  on February  6,  2003. David  A.  Downey,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 03-4480 Filed 2-25-03; 8:45 am]

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 28, 2003.
PREAMBLE 
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2002-SW-31-AD] RIN 2120-AA64

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES; Model HH-1K, TH-1F, TH-1L, UH-1A, UH- 1B, UH-1E,
UH-1F,  UH-1H,  UH-1L, and  UH-1P;  and Southwest  Florida  Aviation Model
SW204,  SW204HP, SW205,  and SW205A-1  Helicopters, Manufactured  by Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc. (BHTI) for the Armed Forces of the United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This   document  proposes   the  supersedure   of  an   existing
airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to specified type-  certificated
military  surplus  helicopters.  That  AD  currently  requires  visual and
radiographic inspections of the Boom Station (BS) 194 skin joint area  and
the  vertical fin  spar caps  for cracks  or fretting.  This action  would
require those same actions, but  would update the type certificate  holder
names  and add  additional model  helicopters to  the applicability.  This
proposal is prompted  by the need  to update the  current type certificate
holders and  to expand  the applicability  to additional  military surplus
helicopters, and expand the inspection  to include corrosion and loose  or
working rivets. The actions specified  by the proposed AD are  intended to
detect a  crack in  the skin  of a  tailboom assembly,  tail rotor gearbox
support fitting, or  vertical fin spar,  which could cause  failure of the
tailboom and loss of control of the helicopter.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 28, 2003.

ADDRESSES:  Submit  comments  in   triplicate  to  the  Federal   Aviation
Administration (FAA),  Office of  the Regional  Counsel, Southwest Region,
Attention: Rules Docket No.  2002-SW-31-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,  Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You may also send comments electronically to  the
Rules Docket at the following address: 9-asw-adcomments@faa.gov.

Comments may be inspected at the Office of the Regional Counsel between  9
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Kohner, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Rotorcraft Certification Office, Fort  Worth,
Texas 76193-0170, telephone (817) 222-5447, fax (817) 222- 5783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

COMMENTS INVITED

    Interested persons  are invited  to participate  in the  making of the
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments  as
    they  may  desire.  Communications should  identify  the  Rules Docket
    number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified  above.
    All communications received on or before the closing date for comments
    will be  considered before  taking action  on the  proposed rule.  The
    proposals contained in  this document may  be changed in  light of the
    comments received.

    Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic,
    environmental, and energy aspects  of the proposed rule.  All comments
    submitted will be  available, both before  and after the  closing date
    for  comments,  in  the Rules  Docket  for  examination by  interested
    persons. A report summarizing  each FAA-public contact concerned  with
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.

    Commenters  wishing the  FAA to  acknowledge receipt  of their  mailed
    comments submitted  in response  to this  proposal must  submit a self
    -  addressed, stamped  postcard on  which the  following statement  is
    made: "Comments  to Docket  No. 2002-SW-31-AD."  The postcard  will be
    date stamped and returned to the commenter.

DISCUSSION

    On January 20, 1983, the FAA issued AD 83-03-03, Amendment 39-4556 (48
    FR  6097,  February  10, 1983),  to  require  visually inspecting  the
    tailboom  skin  and  vertical  fin  front  spar  cap, radiographically
    inspecting the tailboom skin for cracks, and replacing cracked  parts,
    if necessary. That action was prompted by an accident in January  1982
    involving a Model UH-1B helicopter. An investigation revealed tailboom
    skin cracks, and a subsequent metallurgical examination revealed  that
    the cracks were caused by structural fatigue. The requirements of that
    AD are intended  to detect cracks  and to prevent  possible failure of
    the tailboom and fin.

    Since issuing that AD, the FAA has determined that there is a need  to
    expand  the  inspection  to include  corrosion  and  loose or  working
    rivets, update the type  certificate holder names, and  add additional
    model helicopters  to the  applicability, specifically,  the HH-1K, TH
    -1F, TH-1L, and the Southwest  Florida Aviation Model SW204 and  SW205
    series helicopters.

    The unsafe condition identified in this proposal is likely to exist or
    develop on other helicopters of the same type designs. Therefore,  the
    proposed AD would supersede AD 83-03-03 to require:

  • Within 30 hours  time-in-service (TIS),  and  thereafter  at intervals
    not  to exceed  100 hours  TIS, visually  inspecting the  BS 194  skin
    splice for fretting,  corrosion, loose or  working rivets, or  a crack
    and visually inspecting the vertical fin forward spar caps for a crack
    where it intersects with the tail rotor gearbox support fitting.

  • Before further flight and thereafter at  intervals not  to exceed  500
    hours  TIS,  for  a  tailboom assembly  found  to  have  any fretting,
    corrosion, loose  or working  rivets, or  a crack,  or for  a tailboom
    assembly with 1,000 or more hours TIS, radiographically inspecting the
    tailboom at the BS 194 splice joint. The radiographic inspection  must
    be  accomplished   by  an   appropriately-rated  person   or  facility
    authorized  to  perform  this  type  of  inspection.  The radiographic
    inspection must be  performed in accordance  with the requirements  of
    ASTM E 1742-00, MIL-STD-453C, or another FAA-accepted equivalent.  MIL
    -STD-453C has been cancelled by  the issuing agency, however, at  this
    time, the FAA continues to accept its usage.

  • Before further flight, replacing any part in  which a crack  is found,
    or  repairing  any  corrosion   or  other  damage  that   exceeds  the
    limitations in the maintenance and overhaul manuals.

    The  FAA  estimates that  75  helicopters of  U.S.  registry would  be
    affected by this proposed AD,  and that it would take  approximately 4
    work hours per  helicopter to accomplish  the visual inspections,  and
    that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. It is estimated that
    the cost of the radiographic  inspection would be $850 per  inspection
    for labor and materials. The total cost impact of this proposed AD  is
    estimated to be $171,750 ($2,290 per helicopter each year), assuming 6
    visual inspections  and 1  radiographic inspection  per year  for each
    helicopter and no parts will need to be replaced.

    The regulations proposed  herein would not  have a substantial  direct
    effect  on  the  States,  on  the  relationship  between  the national
    Government  and  the  States,  or on  the  distribution  of  power and
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
    is  determined   that  this   proposal  would   not  have   federalism
    implications under Executive Order 13132.

    For  the  reasons  discussed  above,  I  certify  that  this  proposed
    regulation  (1)  is  not  a  "significant  regulatory  action"   under
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is  not a "significant rule" under  the DOT
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures  (44 FR 11034, February  26, 1979);
    and (3) if promulgated, will  not have a significant economic  impact,
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities  under
    the criteria of  the Regulatory Flexibility  Act. A copy  of the draft
    regulatory evaluation  prepared for  this action  is contained  in the
    Rules Docket. A  copy of it  may be obtained  by contacting the  Rules
    Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 14 CFR PART 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT

    Accordingly,  pursuant  to  the  authority  delegated  to  me  by  the
    Administrator, the Federal  Aviation Administration proposes  to amend
    part  39 of  the Federal  Aviation Regulations  (14 CFR  part 39)  as
    follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-4556 (48 FR
6097, February 10, 1983), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), to read as follows: